Prognostic thresholds of outcome predictors in severe accidental hypothermia

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Konrad Mendrala, Tomasz Darocha, Tomáš Brožek, Sylweriusz Kosiński, Martin Balik, Evelien Cools, Beat Walpoth, Ewelina Nowak, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Bartosz Miazgowski, Kacper Reszka, Aleksander Rutkiewicz, Guillaume Debaty, Nicolas Segond, Michał Dudek, Stanisław Górski, Paweł Podsiadło
{"title":"Prognostic thresholds of outcome predictors in severe accidental hypothermia","authors":"Konrad Mendrala, Tomasz Darocha, Tomáš Brožek, Sylweriusz Kosiński, Martin Balik, Evelien Cools, Beat Walpoth, Ewelina Nowak, Wojciech Dąbrowski, Bartosz Miazgowski, Kacper Reszka, Aleksander Rutkiewicz, Guillaume Debaty, Nicolas Segond, Michał Dudek, Stanisław Górski, Paweł Podsiadło","doi":"10.1007/s11739-024-03741-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hemodynamically unstable patients with severe hypothermia and preserved circulation should be transported to dedicated extracorporeal life support (ECLS) centers, but not all are eligible for extracorporeal therapy. In this group of patients, the outcome of rewarming may sometimes be unfavorable. It is, therefore, crucial to identify potential risk factors for death. Furthermore, it is unclear what criterion for hemodynamic stability should be adopted for patients with severe hypothermia. The aim of this study is to identify pre-rewarming predictors of death and their threshold values in hypothermic patients with core temperature ≤ 28 °C and preserved circulation, who were treated without extracorporeal rewarming. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving patients in accidental hypothermia with core temperature 28 °C or lower, and preserved spontaneous circulation on rewarming initiation. The data were collected from the International Hypothermia Registry, HELP Registry, and additional hospital data. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. In the multivariate analysis of laboratory tests and vital signs, systolic blood pressure (SBP) adjusted for cooling circumstances and base excess (BE) were identified as the best predictor of death (OR 0.974 95% CI 0.952–0.996), AUC ROC 0.79 (0.70–0.88). The clinically relevant cutoff for SBP was identified at 90 mmHg with a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.54–0.89) and a specificity of 0.70 (0.60–0.79). The increased risk of death among hypothermic patients with preserved circulation occurs among those with an SBP below 90 mmHg and in those who developed hypothermia in their homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-024-03741-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemodynamically unstable patients with severe hypothermia and preserved circulation should be transported to dedicated extracorporeal life support (ECLS) centers, but not all are eligible for extracorporeal therapy. In this group of patients, the outcome of rewarming may sometimes be unfavorable. It is, therefore, crucial to identify potential risk factors for death. Furthermore, it is unclear what criterion for hemodynamic stability should be adopted for patients with severe hypothermia. The aim of this study is to identify pre-rewarming predictors of death and their threshold values in hypothermic patients with core temperature ≤ 28 °C and preserved circulation, who were treated without extracorporeal rewarming. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study involving patients in accidental hypothermia with core temperature 28 °C or lower, and preserved spontaneous circulation on rewarming initiation. The data were collected from the International Hypothermia Registry, HELP Registry, and additional hospital data. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. In the multivariate analysis of laboratory tests and vital signs, systolic blood pressure (SBP) adjusted for cooling circumstances and base excess (BE) were identified as the best predictor of death (OR 0.974 95% CI 0.952–0.996), AUC ROC 0.79 (0.70–0.88). The clinically relevant cutoff for SBP was identified at 90 mmHg with a sensitivity of 0.74 (0.54–0.89) and a specificity of 0.70 (0.60–0.79). The increased risk of death among hypothermic patients with preserved circulation occurs among those with an SBP below 90 mmHg and in those who developed hypothermia in their homes.

Abstract Image

严重意外低体温症结果预测因子的预后阈值
血流动力学不稳定的重度体温过低患者应被送往专门的体外生命支持(ECLS)中心,但并非所有患者都有资格接受体外治疗。对于这部分患者,复温的结果有时可能并不理想。因此,识别潜在的死亡风险因素至关重要。此外,目前还不清楚严重低体温患者的血流动力学稳定标准是什么。本研究的目的是在核心体温≤28 °C且循环保留的低体温患者中,找出复温前的死亡预测因素及其阈值,这些患者未经体外复温治疗。我们进行了一项多中心回顾性研究,研究对象是核心体温为 28 ℃ 或更低的意外低体温患者,他们在开始复温时自发循环保持良好。数据收集自国际低体温注册中心、HELP 注册中心和其他医院的数据。主要结果是出院后的存活率。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归和接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)分析。在对实验室检查和生命体征进行的多变量分析中,根据降温情况和基数过高(BE)调整后的收缩压(SBP)被确定为预测死亡的最佳指标(OR 0.974 95% CI 0.952-0.996),AUC ROC 0.79(0.70-0.88)。与临床相关的 SBP 临界值为 90 mmHg,灵敏度为 0.74(0.54-0.89),特异度为 0.70(0.60-0.79)。SBP低于90毫米汞柱的低体温患者和在家中出现低体温的患者的死亡风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信