Robust Optimization Using the Mean Model with Bias Correction

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Dean S. Oliver
{"title":"Robust Optimization Using the Mean Model with Bias Correction","authors":"Dean S. Oliver","doi":"10.1007/s11004-024-10155-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Optimization of the expected outcome for subsurface reservoir management when the properties of the subsurface model are uncertain can be costly, especially when the outcomes are predicted using a numerical reservoir flow simulator. The high cost is a consequence of the approximation of the expected outcome by the average of the outcomes from an ensemble of reservoir models, each of which may need to be numerically simulated. Instead of computing the sample average approximation of the objective function, some practitioners have computed the objective function evaluated on the “mean model,” that is, the model whose properties are the means of properties of an ensemble of model realizations. Straightforward use of the mean model without correction for bias is completely justified only when the objective function is a linear function of the uncertain properties. In this paper, we show that by choosing an appropriate transformation of the variables before computing the mean, the mean model can sometimes be used for optimization without bias correction. However, because choosing the appropriate transformation may be difficult, we develop a hierarchical bias correction method that is highly efficient for robust optimization. The bias correction method is coupled with an efficient derivative-free optimization algorithm to reduce the number of function evaluations required for optimization. The new approach is demonstrated on two numerical porous flow optimization problems. In the two-dimensional well location problem with 100 ensemble members, a good approximation of the optimal location is obtained in 10 function evaluations, and a slightly better (nearly optimal) solution using bias correction is obtained using 216 function evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51117,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Geosciences","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-024-10155-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimization of the expected outcome for subsurface reservoir management when the properties of the subsurface model are uncertain can be costly, especially when the outcomes are predicted using a numerical reservoir flow simulator. The high cost is a consequence of the approximation of the expected outcome by the average of the outcomes from an ensemble of reservoir models, each of which may need to be numerically simulated. Instead of computing the sample average approximation of the objective function, some practitioners have computed the objective function evaluated on the “mean model,” that is, the model whose properties are the means of properties of an ensemble of model realizations. Straightforward use of the mean model without correction for bias is completely justified only when the objective function is a linear function of the uncertain properties. In this paper, we show that by choosing an appropriate transformation of the variables before computing the mean, the mean model can sometimes be used for optimization without bias correction. However, because choosing the appropriate transformation may be difficult, we develop a hierarchical bias correction method that is highly efficient for robust optimization. The bias correction method is coupled with an efficient derivative-free optimization algorithm to reduce the number of function evaluations required for optimization. The new approach is demonstrated on two numerical porous flow optimization problems. In the two-dimensional well location problem with 100 ensemble members, a good approximation of the optimal location is obtained in 10 function evaluations, and a slightly better (nearly optimal) solution using bias correction is obtained using 216 function evaluations.

Abstract Image

使用带偏差修正的均值模型进行稳健优化
在地下模型属性不确定的情况下,优化地下储层管理的预期结果可能成本很高,尤其是在使用数值储层流动模拟器预测结果的情况下。成本高的原因是预期结果是由一系列储层模型结果的平均值近似得出的,而每个储层模型都可能需要进行数值模拟。一些实践者没有计算目标函数的样本平均近似值,而是计算了 "平均模型 "的目标函数,即其属性是一系列模型实现属性的平均值的模型。只有当目标函数是不确定属性的线性函数时,直接使用平均模型而不进行偏差修正才是完全合理的。在本文中,我们展示了通过在计算均值之前选择适当的变量变换,均值模型有时可用于优化而无需偏差修正。然而,由于选择适当的变换可能比较困难,我们开发了一种分层偏差修正方法,该方法对稳健优化非常有效。偏差修正方法与高效的无导数优化算法相结合,减少了优化所需的函数求值次数。新方法在两个数值多孔流优化问题上得到了验证。在有 100 个集合成员的二维井位问题中,10 次函数评估就能获得最佳井位的良好近似值,而使用偏差校正后,216 次函数评估就能获得稍好的(接近最佳)解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mathematical Geosciences
Mathematical Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical Geosciences (formerly Mathematical Geology) publishes original, high-quality, interdisciplinary papers in geomathematics focusing on quantitative methods and studies of the Earth, its natural resources and the environment. This international publication is the official journal of the IAMG. Mathematical Geosciences is an essential reference for researchers and practitioners of geomathematics who develop and apply quantitative models to earth science and geo-engineering problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信