Shared sensemaking during a strategic change process: a non-managerial perspective

IF 3.8 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Nadine de Metz, Mari Jansen van Rensburg, Annemarie Davis
{"title":"Shared sensemaking during a strategic change process: a non-managerial perspective","authors":"Nadine de Metz, Mari Jansen van Rensburg, Annemarie Davis","doi":"10.1108/jsma-10-2023-0264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study offers insight into how individuals in non-managerial positions make sense of a strategic change as it unfolds. We explore the dynamic aspects of how these individuals perceive and engage with the evolving process, and how shared strategic understanding is created. The study aimed to bridge the gap between structure and action by highlighting the agency of faculty staff members, during strategic change, in a business school context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study utilized a longitudinal, real-time, inductive approach based on a single explanatory case study to describe how phenomena change over time in context, focusing on faculty staff members in non-managerial positions. Qualitative data was collected in three phases involving real-time reflective diaries and observations, interviews, and documentation. A combinatory process-practice ontology, was adopted, complemented by a “temporal lens” to capture the strategic change process as it unfolded.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors present a temporal process model of strategic change and identify four enabling factors through which shared sensemaking was achieved during the change process. Additionally, the study explores the role of tensions and dissonance in fostering reflection and progress within the context of organizational change.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Findings contribute to the concept of shared sensemaking, and we illustrate how a change process is enabled through the interplay of dynamic (less visible) practices and static (prescriptive) elements of a change process. We contribute towards theory development through a more comprehensive understanding of contextual dynamics and how change processes unfold and interweave, by considering process, structure, and context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strategy and Management","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strategy and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsma-10-2023-0264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study offers insight into how individuals in non-managerial positions make sense of a strategic change as it unfolds. We explore the dynamic aspects of how these individuals perceive and engage with the evolving process, and how shared strategic understanding is created. The study aimed to bridge the gap between structure and action by highlighting the agency of faculty staff members, during strategic change, in a business school context.

Design/methodology/approach

The study utilized a longitudinal, real-time, inductive approach based on a single explanatory case study to describe how phenomena change over time in context, focusing on faculty staff members in non-managerial positions. Qualitative data was collected in three phases involving real-time reflective diaries and observations, interviews, and documentation. A combinatory process-practice ontology, was adopted, complemented by a “temporal lens” to capture the strategic change process as it unfolded.

Findings

The authors present a temporal process model of strategic change and identify four enabling factors through which shared sensemaking was achieved during the change process. Additionally, the study explores the role of tensions and dissonance in fostering reflection and progress within the context of organizational change.

Originality/value

Findings contribute to the concept of shared sensemaking, and we illustrate how a change process is enabled through the interplay of dynamic (less visible) practices and static (prescriptive) elements of a change process. We contribute towards theory development through a more comprehensive understanding of contextual dynamics and how change processes unfold and interweave, by considering process, structure, and context.

战略变革过程中的共同意识形成:非管理视角
目的 本研究深入探讨了非领导职务人员如何在战略变革过程中理解变革的意义。我们探讨了这些人如何看待和参与不断变化的过程,以及如何形成共同的战略理解的动态方面。本研究旨在通过突出商学院背景下教职员工在战略变革过程中的能动性,来弥合结构与行动之间的差距。本研究采用了一种基于单一解释性案例研究的纵向、实时、归纳式方法,以描述现象如何随着时间的推移在背景下发生变化,重点关注非管理职位的教职员工。定性数据分三个阶段收集,包括实时反思日记和观察、访谈和文献。研究结果作者提出了战略变革的时间过程模型,并确定了在变革过程中实现共同感知的四个有利因素。此外,研究还探讨了在组织变革过程中,紧张关系和不和谐因素在促进反思和进步方面所起的作用。原创性/价值研究结果为共同意识的形成这一概念做出了贡献,我们说明了变革过程是如何通过变革过程中的动态(不太明显)实践和静态(规定性)要素的相互作用而得以实现的。通过考虑过程、结构和背景,我们更全面地了解了背景动态以及变革过程如何展开和交织,从而为理论发展做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strategy and Management is an international journal dedicated to: -improving the existing knowledge and understanding of strategy development and implementation globally in private and public organizations -encouraging new thinking and innovative approaches to the study of strategy -offering executives strategic insights based on outcomes of original scholarly research; and -establishing effective communication between researchers and executives managing public and private organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信