{"title":"A simple comparative model of worker‐managed and capital‐managed digital platforms","authors":"Filippo Belloc","doi":"10.1111/meca.12482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a simple model to study the comparative statics of worker‐managed (WM) and capital‐managed (CM) app‐based labor platforms. The model assumes that algorithmic management makes free‐riding and collective decision‐making costs negligible and highlights different pay policies as the distinctive feature differentiating WM and CM platforms, in an environment where workers are financially constrained and capital markets are imperfect. With very simple algebra, we show that WM platforms may show greater cost efficiency and may be better able to benefit from network effects with respect to CM competitors. Yet, viability of WM firms may be critically impeded by the extra‐cost of the external capital, which enables CM platforms to pay a wage premium. The optimal pay policy of CM platforms is shown to vary depending on the intensity of network effects. Reported anecdotal evidence is compatible with main model's results.","PeriodicalId":46885,"journal":{"name":"Metroeconomica","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metroeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We develop a simple model to study the comparative statics of worker‐managed (WM) and capital‐managed (CM) app‐based labor platforms. The model assumes that algorithmic management makes free‐riding and collective decision‐making costs negligible and highlights different pay policies as the distinctive feature differentiating WM and CM platforms, in an environment where workers are financially constrained and capital markets are imperfect. With very simple algebra, we show that WM platforms may show greater cost efficiency and may be better able to benefit from network effects with respect to CM competitors. Yet, viability of WM firms may be critically impeded by the extra‐cost of the external capital, which enables CM platforms to pay a wage premium. The optimal pay policy of CM platforms is shown to vary depending on the intensity of network effects. Reported anecdotal evidence is compatible with main model's results.
我们建立了一个简单的模型来研究工人管理型(WM)和资本管理型(CM)应用程序劳动平台的比较静态。该模型假定算法管理使得搭便车和集体决策成本可以忽略不计,并强调不同的薪酬政策是区分 WM 和 CM 平台的显著特征,在这种环境下,工人受到财务约束,资本市场并不完善。通过非常简单的代数,我们发现,相对于 CM 竞争对手,WM 平台可能显示出更高的成本效率,并能更好地从网络效应中获益。然而,外部资本的额外成本可能会严重阻碍 WM 公司的生存能力,这使得 CM 平台能够支付工资溢价。研究表明,企业管理平台的最优薪酬政策会随着网络效应的强度而变化。报告中的传闻证据与主要模型的结果相符。