Alexander von Glinski,Emre Yilmaz,Periklis Godolias,Lorin Benneker,F C Oner,Frank Kandziora,Gregory Schroeder,Klaus Schnake,Marcel Dvorak,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Alexander Vaccaro,Richard Bransford,Thomas A Schildhauer,Jens R Chapman
{"title":"Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review.","authors":"Alexander von Glinski,Emre Yilmaz,Periklis Godolias,Lorin Benneker,F C Oner,Frank Kandziora,Gregory Schroeder,Klaus Schnake,Marcel Dvorak,Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran,Mohammad El-Sharkawi,Alexander Vaccaro,Richard Bransford,Thomas A Schildhauer,Jens R Chapman","doi":"10.1177/21925682241283726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY DESIGN\r\nBroad narrative review.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVES\r\nTo review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons' preference.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nBy a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241283726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN
Broad narrative review.
OBJECTIVES
To review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.
METHODS
A thorough review of peer-reviewed literature was performed on the historical evolution of sacropelvic fixation techniques and their respective advantages and disadvantages.
RESULTS
The sacropelvic junction has been a long-standing challenge due to a combination of anatomic idiosyncrasies and very high biomechanical forces. While first approaches of fusion were determinated by many material and surgical technique-related limitations, the modern idea of stabilization of the lumbosacral junction was largely initiated by the inclusion of the ilium into lumbosacral fusion. While there is a wide spectrum of indications for SPF the chosen technique remains is defined by the individual pathology and surgeons' preference.
CONCLUSION
By a constant evolution of both instrumentation hardware and surgical technique better fusion rates paired with improved clinical results could be achieved.
研究设计广泛的叙述性综述.Objectivesto review and summarize the evolution of spinopelvic fixation (SPF) and its implications on clinical care.MethodSA就骶骨固定技术的历史演变及其各自的优缺点对同行评议的文献进行了全面的综述.Result骶骨交界处由于解剖学特异性和极高的生物力学力的共同作用,长期以来一直是一个难题。最初的融合方法受到许多材料和手术技术方面的限制,而现代的腰骶部融合方法主要是通过将髂骨纳入腰骶部融合术来实现腰骶部交界处的稳定。虽然 SPF 的适应症范围很广,但所选择的技术仍取决于个体病理和外科医生的偏好。