How many pollen grains should we count? – A basic statistical view

IF 1.7 3区 地球科学 Q2 PALEONTOLOGY
{"title":"How many pollen grains should we count? – A basic statistical view","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.revpalbo.2024.105126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In pollen analysis, one question is often being asked: how many pollen grains should be counted for one sample? The proper count number should guarantee the reliability of the abundance (usually expressed as percentage) of the pollen taxa concerned in the sample. Practically, this number is usually more than 100 grains, but seldom over 1000. Most people tend to count <em>at least</em> 300 pollen grains (often of terrestrial plants)for each sample. However, this number is more likely based on the experience of earlier palynologists rather than on theoretical consideration. In this paper, we apply a simple statistical theory to evaluate the reliability of the observed pollen abundance with different total count number. The reliability is evaluated based on the error range. The results show that the reliability depends on both the true pollen abundance of the taxon concerned and the total count number: a low abundant pollen taxon needs a high count number to obtain a reliable data set. The conclusion is that there is no universal “proper” total count number for each sample. The total count number should be determined by both the abundance of the interested taxa and the research objective. The commonly used 300 grains may be good enough for most general vegetation reconstructions and for the accurate survey of pollen taxa with more than 10% abundance. For less abundant taxa, higher count numbers are suggested.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54488,"journal":{"name":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034666724000770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In pollen analysis, one question is often being asked: how many pollen grains should be counted for one sample? The proper count number should guarantee the reliability of the abundance (usually expressed as percentage) of the pollen taxa concerned in the sample. Practically, this number is usually more than 100 grains, but seldom over 1000. Most people tend to count at least 300 pollen grains (often of terrestrial plants)for each sample. However, this number is more likely based on the experience of earlier palynologists rather than on theoretical consideration. In this paper, we apply a simple statistical theory to evaluate the reliability of the observed pollen abundance with different total count number. The reliability is evaluated based on the error range. The results show that the reliability depends on both the true pollen abundance of the taxon concerned and the total count number: a low abundant pollen taxon needs a high count number to obtain a reliable data set. The conclusion is that there is no universal “proper” total count number for each sample. The total count number should be determined by both the abundance of the interested taxa and the research objective. The commonly used 300 grains may be good enough for most general vegetation reconstructions and for the accurate survey of pollen taxa with more than 10% abundance. For less abundant taxa, higher count numbers are suggested.

我们应该计算多少花粉粒?- 基本统计观点
在花粉分析中,人们经常会问这样一个问题:一个样本应该计数多少花粉粒?适当的计数数量应能保证样本中相关花粉类群丰度(通常以百分比表示)的可靠性。实际上,这个数量通常超过 100 粒,但很少超过 1000 粒。大多数人倾向于为每个样本计数 300 粒花粉(通常是陆生植物的花粉)。不过,这个数字更可能是基于早期古生物学家的经验,而非理论上的考虑。在本文中,我们运用简单的统计理论来评估不同计数总数下观察到的花粉丰度的可靠性。可靠性是根据误差范围来评估的。结果表明,可靠性取决于相关类群的真实花粉丰度和总计数:低丰度的花粉类群需要高计数才能获得可靠的数据集。结论是,对于每个样本而言,并不存在通用的 "适当 "总计数。总计数应该根据相关类群的丰度和研究目标来确定。对于大多数一般植被重建和准确调查丰度超过 10%的花粉类群来说,常用的 300 粒可能就足够了。对于丰度较低的分类群,建议使用更高的计数粒数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology is an international journal for articles in all fields of palaeobotany and palynology dealing with all groups, ranging from marine palynomorphs to higher land plants. Original contributions and comprehensive review papers should appeal to an international audience. Typical topics include but are not restricted to systematics, evolution, palaeobiology, palaeoecology, biostratigraphy, biochronology, palaeoclimatology, paleogeography, taphonomy, palaeoenvironmental reconstructions, vegetation history, and practical applications of palaeobotany and palynology, e.g. in coal and petroleum geology and archaeology. The journal especially encourages the publication of articles in which palaeobotany and palynology are applied for solving fundamental geological and biological problems as well as innovative and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信