Giulia Severi, Enrico Ambrosini, Luca Caramanna, Luigi Monti, Pamela Magini, Giovanni Innella
{"title":"Familial DMRT1-related non-obstructive azoospermia: a case report","authors":"Giulia Severi, Enrico Ambrosini, Luca Caramanna, Luigi Monti, Pamela Magini, Giovanni Innella","doi":"10.1007/s10815-024-03250-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>To report an exceptional case of male-to-male transmission of genetically based non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and varicocele through a naturally obtained pregnancy.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Subjects and methods</h3><p>A father and his son were both diagnosed with NOA after centrifugation and varicocele. The father has no other clinical concerns apart from infertility, detected after many attempts of having another child, but given his urological situation (bilateral varicocele and NOA) assisted reproductive techniques were discouraged. After genetic counseling, several genetic-chromosomal analyses were carried out in the son (karyotype, chromosome Y microdeletions, <i>CFTR</i> screening, NGS infertility panels, and finally array-CGH).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>After a series of inconclusive tests, array-CGH detected a deletion of 224–283 kb (del9p24.3) involving part of the <i>KANK1</i> and <i>DMRT1</i> genes, inherited from the father. Haploinsufficiency of <i>DMRT1</i> was therefore considered the determining factor in the development of azoospermia in the family by a loss of function mechanism.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The confirmation of father-to-son transmission of a deletion including <i>DMRT1</i> represents an important point for clinicians dealing with male infertility, even when complete azoospermia is repetitively detected, and must be of hope for a relevant portion of men. Inclusion criteria for the access to assisted reproductive techniques may also be reconsidered and worthy of a greater number of clinical insights. Finally, since <i>DMRT1</i> alterations have been associated with NOA and abnormal testicular development, but not specifically with varicocele, further studies are required to validate this issue, as varicocele may have played a crucial role in this case.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03250-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
To report an exceptional case of male-to-male transmission of genetically based non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and varicocele through a naturally obtained pregnancy.
Subjects and methods
A father and his son were both diagnosed with NOA after centrifugation and varicocele. The father has no other clinical concerns apart from infertility, detected after many attempts of having another child, but given his urological situation (bilateral varicocele and NOA) assisted reproductive techniques were discouraged. After genetic counseling, several genetic-chromosomal analyses were carried out in the son (karyotype, chromosome Y microdeletions, CFTR screening, NGS infertility panels, and finally array-CGH).
Results
After a series of inconclusive tests, array-CGH detected a deletion of 224–283 kb (del9p24.3) involving part of the KANK1 and DMRT1 genes, inherited from the father. Haploinsufficiency of DMRT1 was therefore considered the determining factor in the development of azoospermia in the family by a loss of function mechanism.
Conclusion
The confirmation of father-to-son transmission of a deletion including DMRT1 represents an important point for clinicians dealing with male infertility, even when complete azoospermia is repetitively detected, and must be of hope for a relevant portion of men. Inclusion criteria for the access to assisted reproductive techniques may also be reconsidered and worthy of a greater number of clinical insights. Finally, since DMRT1 alterations have been associated with NOA and abnormal testicular development, but not specifically with varicocele, further studies are required to validate this issue, as varicocele may have played a crucial role in this case.