Effectiveness analysis of deceleration capacity and traditional heart rate variability in diagnosing vasovagal syncope

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yongzhe Guo, Tao Lin, Nanyu Lin, Huizhong Lin
{"title":"Effectiveness analysis of deceleration capacity and traditional heart rate variability in diagnosing vasovagal syncope","authors":"Yongzhe Guo, Tao Lin, Nanyu Lin, Huizhong Lin","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2024.1333684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundVasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent medical condition with a lack of efficient methods for its detection.AimThis study aimed to explore an objective clinical indicator in diagnosing VVS.MethodsThe retrospective analysis involved clinical data of 243 syncope patients from 1 June 2020 to 31 July 2023. Among them, 108 patients had a negative result in the tilt test (TTT), while the remaining 135 patients had a positive result in the TTT. Relevant statistical methods were utilized to examine the correlation between VVS and different indicators of heart rate variability.ResultsAfter screening, 354 patients being considered for VVS were evaluated, resulting in a final sample size of 243. Sex, age, deceleration capacity (DC), and standard deviation of all normal-to-normal intervals (SDNNs) were the variables that showed statistical significance between the TTT(−) group and the TTT(+) group. Independent risk factors identified by multivariate logistic regression were DC [odds ratio (OR) 1.710, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.388–2.106, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001] and SDNN (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.018–1.049, <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001). Comparing the groups, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a notable distinction in both DC and SDNN [the respective areas under the curve were 0.789 (95% CI 0.730–0.848) and 0.702 (95% CI 0.637–0.767); the cutoff values were 7.15 and 131.42; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;lt; 0.001, respectively].ConclusionIn summary, DC can function as an impartial and easily accessible clinical marker for differentiating VVS. A value exceeding 7.15 ms might suggest a higher likelihood of syncope.","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2024.1333684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundVasovagal syncope (VVS) is a prevalent medical condition with a lack of efficient methods for its detection.AimThis study aimed to explore an objective clinical indicator in diagnosing VVS.MethodsThe retrospective analysis involved clinical data of 243 syncope patients from 1 June 2020 to 31 July 2023. Among them, 108 patients had a negative result in the tilt test (TTT), while the remaining 135 patients had a positive result in the TTT. Relevant statistical methods were utilized to examine the correlation between VVS and different indicators of heart rate variability.ResultsAfter screening, 354 patients being considered for VVS were evaluated, resulting in a final sample size of 243. Sex, age, deceleration capacity (DC), and standard deviation of all normal-to-normal intervals (SDNNs) were the variables that showed statistical significance between the TTT(−) group and the TTT(+) group. Independent risk factors identified by multivariate logistic regression were DC [odds ratio (OR) 1.710, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.388–2.106, P &lt; 0.001] and SDNN (OR 1.033, 95% CI 1.018–1.049, P &lt; 0.001). Comparing the groups, receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a notable distinction in both DC and SDNN [the respective areas under the curve were 0.789 (95% CI 0.730–0.848) and 0.702 (95% CI 0.637–0.767); the cutoff values were 7.15 and 131.42; P &lt; 0.001, respectively].ConclusionIn summary, DC can function as an impartial and easily accessible clinical marker for differentiating VVS. A value exceeding 7.15 ms might suggest a higher likelihood of syncope.
减速能力和传统心率变异性在诊断血管迷走性晕厥中的有效性分析
背景血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)是一种普遍存在的内科疾病,目前缺乏有效的检测方法。其中,108 例患者倾斜试验(TTT)结果为阴性,其余 135 例患者倾斜试验结果为阳性。结果经过筛查,评估了 354 名考虑进行 VVS 的患者,最终样本量为 243 人。性别、年龄、减速能力(DC)和所有正常至正常间期的标准偏差(SDNNs)是在 TTT(-)组和 TTT(+)组之间显示出统计学意义的变量。多变量逻辑回归确定的独立风险因素是 DC [几率比(OR)1.710,95% 置信区间(CI)1.388-2.106,P &lt; 0.001]和 SDNN(OR 1.033,95% CI 1.018-1.049,P &lt; 0.001)。比较各组,接收器操作特征分析显示 DC 和 SDNN 均有显著差异[曲线下面积分别为 0.789 (95% CI 0.730-0.848) 和 0.702 (95% CI 0.637-0.767); 临界值分别为 7.15 和 131.42; P &lt; 0.001]。超过 7.15 毫秒的数值可能表明晕厥的可能性较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信