Easy-access online social media metrics can effectively identify misinformation sharing users

Júlia Számely, Alessandro Galeazzi, Júlia Koltai, Elisa Omodei
{"title":"Easy-access online social media metrics can effectively identify misinformation sharing users","authors":"Júlia Számely, Alessandro Galeazzi, Júlia Koltai, Elisa Omodei","doi":"arxiv-2408.15186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Misinformation poses a significant challenge studied extensively by\nresearchers, yet acquiring data to identify primary sharers is costly and\nchallenging. To address this, we propose a low-barrier approach to\ndifferentiate social media users who are more likely to share misinformation\nfrom those who are less likely. Leveraging insights from previous studies, we\ndemonstrate that easy-access online social network metrics -- average daily\ntweet count, and account age -- can be leveraged to help identify potential low\nfactuality content spreaders on X (previously known as Twitter). We find that\nhigher tweet frequency is positively associated with low factuality in shared\ncontent, while account age is negatively associated with it. We also find that\nsome of the effects, namely the effect of the number of accounts followed and\nthe number of tweets produced, differ depending on the number of followers a\nuser has. Our findings show that relying on these easy-access social network\nmetrics could serve as a low-barrier approach for initial identification of\nusers who are more likely to spread misinformation, and therefore contribute to\ncombating misinformation effectively on social media platforms.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.15186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Misinformation poses a significant challenge studied extensively by researchers, yet acquiring data to identify primary sharers is costly and challenging. To address this, we propose a low-barrier approach to differentiate social media users who are more likely to share misinformation from those who are less likely. Leveraging insights from previous studies, we demonstrate that easy-access online social network metrics -- average daily tweet count, and account age -- can be leveraged to help identify potential low factuality content spreaders on X (previously known as Twitter). We find that higher tweet frequency is positively associated with low factuality in shared content, while account age is negatively associated with it. We also find that some of the effects, namely the effect of the number of accounts followed and the number of tweets produced, differ depending on the number of followers a user has. Our findings show that relying on these easy-access social network metrics could serve as a low-barrier approach for initial identification of users who are more likely to spread misinformation, and therefore contribute to combating misinformation effectively on social media platforms.
易于访问的在线社交媒体指标可有效识别分享错误信息的用户
误导信息是研究人员广泛研究的一个重大挑战,但获取数据以识别主要分享者的成本高昂且具有挑战性。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种低门槛的方法来区分那些更有可能分享错误信息的社交媒体用户和那些不太可能分享错误信息的用户。利用以往研究的洞察力,我们证明了易于访问的在线社交网络指标--平均每日推文数量和账户年龄--可以用来帮助识别 X(以前称为 Twitter)上潜在的低事实性内容传播者。我们发现,较高的推文频率与低事实性分享内容呈正相关,而账户年龄则与之呈负相关。我们还发现,一些影响,即关注账户数量和推文数量的影响,因用户拥有的关注者数量而异。我们的研究结果表明,依靠这些易于获取的社交网络指标可以作为一种低门槛的方法,初步识别出更有可能传播虚假信息的用户,从而有助于有效打击社交媒体平台上的虚假信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信