The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters

Olumide Adisa, Enio Alterman Blay, Yasaman Asgari, Gabriele Di Bona, Samantha Dies, Ana Maria Jaramillo, Paulo H. Resende, Ana Maria de Sousa Leitao
{"title":"The overlooked need for Ethics in Complexity Science: Why it matters","authors":"Olumide Adisa, Enio Alterman Blay, Yasaman Asgari, Gabriele Di Bona, Samantha Dies, Ana Maria Jaramillo, Paulo H. Resende, Ana Maria de Sousa Leitao","doi":"arxiv-2409.02002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complexity science, despite its broad scope and potential impact, has not\nkept pace with fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology and social\nsciences in addressing ethical concerns. The field lacks a comprehensive\nethical framework, leaving us, as a community, vulnerable to ethical challenges\nand dilemmas. Other areas have gone through similar experiences and created,\nwith discussions and working groups, their guides, policies and\nrecommendations. Therefore, here we highlight the critical absence of formal\nguidelines, dedicated ethical committees, and widespread discussions on ethics\nwithin the complexity science community. Drawing on insights from the\ndisciplines mentioned earlier, we propose a roadmap to enhance ethical\nawareness and action. Our recommendations include (i) initiating supportive\nmechanisms to develop ethical guidelines specific to complex systems research,\n(ii) creating open-access resources, and (iii) fostering inclusive dialogues to\nensure that complexity science can responsibly tackle societal challenges and\nachieve a more inclusive environment. By initiating this dialogue, we aim to\nencourage a necessary shift in how ethics is integrated into complexity\nresearch, positioning the field to address contemporary challenges more\neffectively.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complexity science, despite its broad scope and potential impact, has not kept pace with fields like artificial intelligence, biotechnology and social sciences in addressing ethical concerns. The field lacks a comprehensive ethical framework, leaving us, as a community, vulnerable to ethical challenges and dilemmas. Other areas have gone through similar experiences and created, with discussions and working groups, their guides, policies and recommendations. Therefore, here we highlight the critical absence of formal guidelines, dedicated ethical committees, and widespread discussions on ethics within the complexity science community. Drawing on insights from the disciplines mentioned earlier, we propose a roadmap to enhance ethical awareness and action. Our recommendations include (i) initiating supportive mechanisms to develop ethical guidelines specific to complex systems research, (ii) creating open-access resources, and (iii) fostering inclusive dialogues to ensure that complexity science can responsibly tackle societal challenges and achieve a more inclusive environment. By initiating this dialogue, we aim to encourage a necessary shift in how ethics is integrated into complexity research, positioning the field to address contemporary challenges more effectively.
复杂性科学中被忽视的伦理需求:为何重要
复杂性科学尽管涉及面广、潜在影响大,但在解决伦理问题方面却没有跟上人工智能、生物技术和社会科学等领域的步伐。该领域缺乏一个全面的伦理框架,使我们作为一个群体很容易受到伦理挑战和困境的影响。其他领域也有类似的经历,并通过讨论和工作组创建了自己的指南、政策和建议。因此,我们在此强调复杂性科学界严重缺乏正式指南、专门的伦理委员会和广泛的伦理讨论。借鉴前面提到的各学科的见解,我们提出了一个加强伦理意识和行动的路线图。我们的建议包括:(i) 启动支持性机制,制定专门针对复杂系统研究的伦理准则;(ii) 创建开放获取的资源;(iii) 促进包容性对话,确保复杂性科学能够负责任地应对社会挑战,实现更具包容性的环境。通过发起这一对话,我们旨在鼓励在如何将伦理学纳入复杂性研究方面进行必要的转变,使该领域能够更有效地应对当代挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信