Memory and Personality in Ideological Polarization: The Politico-physics of Mnemomatter

Shengkai Li, Trung V. Phan, Luca Di Carlo, Gao Wang, Van H. Do, Elia Mikhail, Robert H. Austin, Liyu Liu
{"title":"Memory and Personality in Ideological Polarization: The Politico-physics of Mnemomatter","authors":"Shengkai Li, Trung V. Phan, Luca Di Carlo, Gao Wang, Van H. Do, Elia Mikhail, Robert H. Austin, Liyu Liu","doi":"arxiv-2409.06660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used physical agents with deep memories of past events and left/right\nideologies but different fixed personalities to study what drives the\npolarization of the dynamic population ideology. We find that agents have a\ncritical memory depth below which complete ideology polarization of the\ncollective cannot occur and above which it is inevitable. However, depending on\nthe details of the personalities, the ideologies polarization can be static or\ndynamic in time, even chaotic. Thus, agents with different personalities and\nlevels of memory (mnemomatter) can serve as a physics analogue of the ideology\ndynamics among ideological beings, illuminating how decisions influenced by\nindividual memories of past interactions can shape and influence subsequent\nideology polarization. Each constituent agent harbors a private stack memory\nand an onboard microcomputer/controller which both measures and controls its\nphysical spin handedness, which is a proxy for ideology. The agent's decision\nto change or retain its current spin is determined by each agent's private\nalgorithm for decisions (the personality) and the time-weighted stack history\nof present and previous interactions. Depending on a given agent's personality\nfor evaluating its memory and experiences, an agent can act as a curmudgeon who\nnever changes its ideology, a pushover who always accepts change, a contrarian\nwho always does the opposite of what is expected, an opportunist who weighs\nrecent events more heavily than past events in making decisions, and a\ntraditionalist who weighs past events more heavily than recent events in\ndecision making. We develop a field theory which maps agent ideological\npolarization over into a dynamic potential landscape. Perhaps such applications\nof physics-based systems to political systems will help us to understand the\nideological instability observed in the world today.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We used physical agents with deep memories of past events and left/right ideologies but different fixed personalities to study what drives the polarization of the dynamic population ideology. We find that agents have a critical memory depth below which complete ideology polarization of the collective cannot occur and above which it is inevitable. However, depending on the details of the personalities, the ideologies polarization can be static or dynamic in time, even chaotic. Thus, agents with different personalities and levels of memory (mnemomatter) can serve as a physics analogue of the ideology dynamics among ideological beings, illuminating how decisions influenced by individual memories of past interactions can shape and influence subsequent ideology polarization. Each constituent agent harbors a private stack memory and an onboard microcomputer/controller which both measures and controls its physical spin handedness, which is a proxy for ideology. The agent's decision to change or retain its current spin is determined by each agent's private algorithm for decisions (the personality) and the time-weighted stack history of present and previous interactions. Depending on a given agent's personality for evaluating its memory and experiences, an agent can act as a curmudgeon who never changes its ideology, a pushover who always accepts change, a contrarian who always does the opposite of what is expected, an opportunist who weighs recent events more heavily than past events in making decisions, and a traditionalist who weighs past events more heavily than recent events in decision making. We develop a field theory which maps agent ideological polarization over into a dynamic potential landscape. Perhaps such applications of physics-based systems to political systems will help us to understand the ideological instability observed in the world today.
意识形态两极化中的记忆与人格:记忆物质的政治物理学
我们使用对过去事件和左右意识形态有深刻记忆但固定性格不同的物理代理来研究是什么驱动了动态人口意识形态的极化。我们发现,代理人有一个临界记忆深度,低于这个深度,集体的意识形态就不可能完全极化,而高于这个深度,极化就不可避免。然而,根据个性细节的不同,意识形态极化在时间上可以是静态的,也可以是动态的,甚至是混乱的。因此,具有不同性格和记忆水平(记忆物质)的代理可以作为意识形态生物之间意识形态动力学的物理学类比,揭示受过去互动的个人记忆影响的决策如何塑造和影响随后的意识形态极化。每个组成代理都有一个私人堆栈存储器和一个板载微型计算机/控制器,用于测量和控制其物理自旋手性,这是意识形态的代表。代理改变或保留其当前自旋的决定由每个代理的私有决策算法(个性)以及当前和以往互动的时间加权堆栈历史决定。根据特定代理评估其记忆和经验的个性,代理可以充当从不改变其意识形态的老顽固、总是接受变化的推波助澜者、总是反其道而行之的逆反者、在做决定时更看重近期事件而非过去事件的机会主义者,以及在做决定时更看重过去事件而非近期事件的传统主义者。我们提出了一种场论,将代理人的意识形态极化映射到动态的潜在景观中。或许,将这种基于物理学的系统应用于政治系统将有助于我们理解当今世界意识形态的不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信