Shengkai Li, Trung V. Phan, Luca Di Carlo, Gao Wang, Van H. Do, Elia Mikhail, Robert H. Austin, Liyu Liu
{"title":"Memory and Personality in Ideological Polarization: The Politico-physics of Mnemomatter","authors":"Shengkai Li, Trung V. Phan, Luca Di Carlo, Gao Wang, Van H. Do, Elia Mikhail, Robert H. Austin, Liyu Liu","doi":"arxiv-2409.06660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We used physical agents with deep memories of past events and left/right\nideologies but different fixed personalities to study what drives the\npolarization of the dynamic population ideology. We find that agents have a\ncritical memory depth below which complete ideology polarization of the\ncollective cannot occur and above which it is inevitable. However, depending on\nthe details of the personalities, the ideologies polarization can be static or\ndynamic in time, even chaotic. Thus, agents with different personalities and\nlevels of memory (mnemomatter) can serve as a physics analogue of the ideology\ndynamics among ideological beings, illuminating how decisions influenced by\nindividual memories of past interactions can shape and influence subsequent\nideology polarization. Each constituent agent harbors a private stack memory\nand an onboard microcomputer/controller which both measures and controls its\nphysical spin handedness, which is a proxy for ideology. The agent's decision\nto change or retain its current spin is determined by each agent's private\nalgorithm for decisions (the personality) and the time-weighted stack history\nof present and previous interactions. Depending on a given agent's personality\nfor evaluating its memory and experiences, an agent can act as a curmudgeon who\nnever changes its ideology, a pushover who always accepts change, a contrarian\nwho always does the opposite of what is expected, an opportunist who weighs\nrecent events more heavily than past events in making decisions, and a\ntraditionalist who weighs past events more heavily than recent events in\ndecision making. We develop a field theory which maps agent ideological\npolarization over into a dynamic potential landscape. Perhaps such applications\nof physics-based systems to political systems will help us to understand the\nideological instability observed in the world today.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.06660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We used physical agents with deep memories of past events and left/right
ideologies but different fixed personalities to study what drives the
polarization of the dynamic population ideology. We find that agents have a
critical memory depth below which complete ideology polarization of the
collective cannot occur and above which it is inevitable. However, depending on
the details of the personalities, the ideologies polarization can be static or
dynamic in time, even chaotic. Thus, agents with different personalities and
levels of memory (mnemomatter) can serve as a physics analogue of the ideology
dynamics among ideological beings, illuminating how decisions influenced by
individual memories of past interactions can shape and influence subsequent
ideology polarization. Each constituent agent harbors a private stack memory
and an onboard microcomputer/controller which both measures and controls its
physical spin handedness, which is a proxy for ideology. The agent's decision
to change or retain its current spin is determined by each agent's private
algorithm for decisions (the personality) and the time-weighted stack history
of present and previous interactions. Depending on a given agent's personality
for evaluating its memory and experiences, an agent can act as a curmudgeon who
never changes its ideology, a pushover who always accepts change, a contrarian
who always does the opposite of what is expected, an opportunist who weighs
recent events more heavily than past events in making decisions, and a
traditionalist who weighs past events more heavily than recent events in
decision making. We develop a field theory which maps agent ideological
polarization over into a dynamic potential landscape. Perhaps such applications
of physics-based systems to political systems will help us to understand the
ideological instability observed in the world today.