{"title":"Impact of changing the wet deposition schemes in ldx on 137-cs atmosperic deposits after the fukushima accident","authors":"Arnaud QuérelIRSN, IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SESUC/BMCA, Denis QuéloIRSN/PSE-SANTE/SESUC/BMCA, IRSN, Yelva RoustanCEREA, Anne MathieuIRSN, IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SESUC/BMCA, Mizuo KajinoMRI, Thomas SekiyamaMRI, Kouji AdachiMRI, Damien DidierIRSN, IRSN/PSE-SANTE/SESUC/BMCA, Yasuhito IgarashiMRI, Takashi MakiMRI","doi":"arxiv-2408.11460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Fukushima-Daiichi release of radioactivity is a relevant event to study\nthe atmospheric dispersion modelling of radionuclides. Actually, the\natmospheric deposition onto the ground may be studied through the map of\nmeasured Cs-137 established consecutively to the accident. The limits of\ndetection were low enough to make the measurements possible as far as 250km\nfrom the nuclear power plant. This large scale deposition has been modelled\nwith the Eulerian model ldX. However, several weeks of emissions in multiple\nweather conditions make it a real challenge. Besides, these measurements are\naccumulated deposition of Cs-137 over the whole period and do not inform of\ndeposition mechanisms involved: in-cloud, below-cloud, dry deposition. In a\nprevious study (Qu{\\'e}rel et al., 2016), a comprehensive sensitivity analysis\nwas performed in order to understand wet deposition mechanisms. It has been\nshown that the choice of the wet deposition scheme has a strong impact on\nassessment of deposition patterns. Nevertheless, a ``best'' scheme could not be\nhighlighted as it depends on the selected criteria: the ranking differs\naccording to the statistical indicators considered (correlation, figure of\nmerit in space and factor 2). A possibility to explain the difficulty to\ndiscriminate between several schemes was the uncertainties in the modelling,\nresulting from the meteorological data for instance. Since the move of the\nplume is not properly modelled, the deposition processes are applied with an\ninaccurate activity concentration in the air. In the framework of the SAKURA\nproject, an MRI-IRSN collaboration, new meteorological fields at higher\nresolution (Sekiyama et al., 2013) were provided and allow to reconsider the\nprevious study. An update including these new meteorology data is presented. In\naddition, the focus is put on the deposition schemes commonly used in nuclear\nemergency context.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.11460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Fukushima-Daiichi release of radioactivity is a relevant event to study
the atmospheric dispersion modelling of radionuclides. Actually, the
atmospheric deposition onto the ground may be studied through the map of
measured Cs-137 established consecutively to the accident. The limits of
detection were low enough to make the measurements possible as far as 250km
from the nuclear power plant. This large scale deposition has been modelled
with the Eulerian model ldX. However, several weeks of emissions in multiple
weather conditions make it a real challenge. Besides, these measurements are
accumulated deposition of Cs-137 over the whole period and do not inform of
deposition mechanisms involved: in-cloud, below-cloud, dry deposition. In a
previous study (Qu{\'e}rel et al., 2016), a comprehensive sensitivity analysis
was performed in order to understand wet deposition mechanisms. It has been
shown that the choice of the wet deposition scheme has a strong impact on
assessment of deposition patterns. Nevertheless, a ``best'' scheme could not be
highlighted as it depends on the selected criteria: the ranking differs
according to the statistical indicators considered (correlation, figure of
merit in space and factor 2). A possibility to explain the difficulty to
discriminate between several schemes was the uncertainties in the modelling,
resulting from the meteorological data for instance. Since the move of the
plume is not properly modelled, the deposition processes are applied with an
inaccurate activity concentration in the air. In the framework of the SAKURA
project, an MRI-IRSN collaboration, new meteorological fields at higher
resolution (Sekiyama et al., 2013) were provided and allow to reconsider the
previous study. An update including these new meteorology data is presented. In
addition, the focus is put on the deposition schemes commonly used in nuclear
emergency context.