Comparative study for underlying concepts of land acquisition during post-disaster recovery in Italy, the United States and Japan

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kensuke Otsuyama, Tomoyuki Mashiko, Haruka Tsukuda
{"title":"Comparative study for underlying concepts of land acquisition during post-disaster recovery in Italy, the United States and Japan","authors":"Kensuke Otsuyama, Tomoyuki Mashiko, Haruka Tsukuda","doi":"10.1108/dpm-11-2023-0308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Studies on land acquisition (LA) and recovery simulations have garnered considerable attention amidst climate change. Previous literature has reported that LA and relocation contribute to reducing repetitive disaster losses or downzoning (limiting development). However, studies on decision-making about resettlement or relocation for landowners or decision-makers for disaster-impacted lands are limited. This study aims to qualitatively illustrate LA program schemes for recovery, and identify the underlying concepts of LA in Italy, the United States and Japan. By doing so, this study contributes to construction of future agent-based recovery simulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This study seeks to identify a variety of LA models in different contexts to provide input for future works. This study employed multiple case studies to explore common and contrasting results, and identify varied LA concepts. The methodology involved a literature review, including official reports, to examine the timeframes of LA projects qualitatively, complemented using aerial photos to confirm related land use changes pre- and post-LA.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The results indicate that buyout programs in the United States enhance renaturalization in flood-prone areas as a downzoning approach. In contrast, LA in Japan focuses on the continuation of communities or neighborhoods through the recovery and relocation process. In Italy, LA is used to contribute to supporting the tradition/legacy of historic housing and facilities for post-disaster temporary dwellings, reflecting an underlying concept of “tradition and legacy.”</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This comparative study fills a research gap by focusing on LA concepts, and its novelty lies in finding the underlying concepts of LA in three countries. Through international comparison, it suggests that LA in Japan could incorporate conservation of the historical town center or the opportunity for downzoning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"288 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-11-2023-0308","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Studies on land acquisition (LA) and recovery simulations have garnered considerable attention amidst climate change. Previous literature has reported that LA and relocation contribute to reducing repetitive disaster losses or downzoning (limiting development). However, studies on decision-making about resettlement or relocation for landowners or decision-makers for disaster-impacted lands are limited. This study aims to qualitatively illustrate LA program schemes for recovery, and identify the underlying concepts of LA in Italy, the United States and Japan. By doing so, this study contributes to construction of future agent-based recovery simulations.

Design/methodology/approach

This study seeks to identify a variety of LA models in different contexts to provide input for future works. This study employed multiple case studies to explore common and contrasting results, and identify varied LA concepts. The methodology involved a literature review, including official reports, to examine the timeframes of LA projects qualitatively, complemented using aerial photos to confirm related land use changes pre- and post-LA.

Findings

The results indicate that buyout programs in the United States enhance renaturalization in flood-prone areas as a downzoning approach. In contrast, LA in Japan focuses on the continuation of communities or neighborhoods through the recovery and relocation process. In Italy, LA is used to contribute to supporting the tradition/legacy of historic housing and facilities for post-disaster temporary dwellings, reflecting an underlying concept of “tradition and legacy.”

Originality/value

This comparative study fills a research gap by focusing on LA concepts, and its novelty lies in finding the underlying concepts of LA in three countries. Through international comparison, it suggests that LA in Japan could incorporate conservation of the historical town center or the opportunity for downzoning.

意大利、美国和日本灾后恢复期间土地征用基本概念的比较研究
目的 在气候变化的背景下,有关土地征用(LA)和恢复模拟的研究引起了广泛关注。以往的文献报道,土地征用和搬迁有助于减少重复性灾害损失或缩小区域范围(限制开发)。然而,有关土地所有者或决策者对受灾害影响土地的重新安置或搬迁决策的研究却十分有限。本研究旨在定性地说明用于恢复的 LA 计划方案,并确定意大利、美国和日本的 LA 基本概念。本研究旨在确定不同背景下的各种 LA 模型,为今后的工作提供参考。本研究采用了多个案例研究,以探索共同结果和对比结果,并确定各种 LA 概念。研究方法包括文献综述(包括官方报告),以定性研究土地退化评估项目的时间框架,并辅以航拍照片,以确认土地退化评估前后的相关土地利用变化。相比之下,在日本,LA 的重点是在恢复和搬迁过程中延续社区或邻里关系。在意大利,LA 被用于支持灾后临时住所的历史住房和设施的传统/遗产,反映了 "传统和遗产 "的基本概念。 原创性/价值 这项比较研究通过关注 LA 概念填补了研究空白,其新颖性在于发现了三个国家的 LA 基本概念。通过国际比较,该研究认为日本的 LA 可以结合历史城镇中心的保护或缩小分区的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信