Causal relationships between dyslexia and the risk of eight dementias

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Ping Zhu, Shan Gao, Shiyang Wu, Xuan Li, Chen Huang, Yan Chen, Guiyou Liu
{"title":"Causal relationships between dyslexia and the risk of eight dementias","authors":"Ping Zhu, Shan Gao, Shiyang Wu, Xuan Li, Chen Huang, Yan Chen, Guiyou Liu","doi":"10.1038/s41398-024-03082-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Observational and genetic studies have reported the relationship between dyslexia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Until now, the causal effect of dyslexia on AD risk has remained unclear. We conducted a two-sample univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the causal association between dyslexia and the risk of AD, vascular dementia (VD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and its four subtypes. First, we selected 42 dyslexia genetic variants from a large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) dataset and extracted their corresponding GWAS summary statistics from AD, VD, LBD, and FTD. Second, we selected four MR methods, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO. Heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were then used to evaluate the reliability of all causal estimates. We also conducted multivariable MR (MVMR) and mediation analysis to assess the potential mediating role of cognitive performance (CP) or educational achievement (EA) on the causal association between dyslexia and AD. Two MVMR methods, including MV IVW and MV-Egger, and two-step MR were used to perform the analysis. Using IVW, we found a significant causal association between increased dyslexia and increased risk of AD (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04–1.28, <i>P</i> = 0.006), but not VD, LBD, FTD, or its four subtypes. MR-PRESSO further supported the statistically significant association between dyslexia and AD (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05–1.27, <i>P</i> = 0.006). All sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of causal estimates. Using MV IVW and mediation analysis, we found no causal relationship between dyslexia and AD after adjusting for CP but not EA, CP mediated the total effect of dyslexia on AD with a proportion of 46.32%. We provide genetic evidence to support a causal effect of increased dyslexia on increased risk of AD, which was largely mediated by CP. Reading activity may be a potential intervention strategy for AD by improving cognitive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03082-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Observational and genetic studies have reported the relationship between dyslexia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Until now, the causal effect of dyslexia on AD risk has remained unclear. We conducted a two-sample univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the causal association between dyslexia and the risk of AD, vascular dementia (VD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and its four subtypes. First, we selected 42 dyslexia genetic variants from a large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) dataset and extracted their corresponding GWAS summary statistics from AD, VD, LBD, and FTD. Second, we selected four MR methods, including inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO. Heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were then used to evaluate the reliability of all causal estimates. We also conducted multivariable MR (MVMR) and mediation analysis to assess the potential mediating role of cognitive performance (CP) or educational achievement (EA) on the causal association between dyslexia and AD. Two MVMR methods, including MV IVW and MV-Egger, and two-step MR were used to perform the analysis. Using IVW, we found a significant causal association between increased dyslexia and increased risk of AD (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04–1.28, P = 0.006), but not VD, LBD, FTD, or its four subtypes. MR-PRESSO further supported the statistically significant association between dyslexia and AD (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05–1.27, P = 0.006). All sensitivity analyses confirmed the reliability of causal estimates. Using MV IVW and mediation analysis, we found no causal relationship between dyslexia and AD after adjusting for CP but not EA, CP mediated the total effect of dyslexia on AD with a proportion of 46.32%. We provide genetic evidence to support a causal effect of increased dyslexia on increased risk of AD, which was largely mediated by CP. Reading activity may be a potential intervention strategy for AD by improving cognitive function.

Abstract Image

阅读障碍与八种痴呆症风险之间的因果关系
观察性研究和遗传学研究已经报道了阅读障碍与阿尔茨海默病(AD)之间的关系。迄今为止,阅读障碍对阿尔茨海默病风险的因果影响仍不明确。我们进行了双样本单变量孟德尔随机化(MR)分析,以确定阅读障碍与AD、血管性痴呆(VD)、路易体痴呆(LBD)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD)及其四个亚型的发病风险之间的因果关系。首先,我们从大规模全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据集中选取了42个阅读障碍遗传变异,并提取了其对应的AD、VD、LBD和FTD的GWAS汇总统计。其次,我们选择了四种 MR 方法,包括逆方差加权(IVW)、加权中位数、MR-Egger 和 MR-PRESSO。然后使用异质性、水平多向性和撇除敏感性分析来评估所有因果关系估计值的可靠性。我们还进行了多变量MR(MVMR)和中介分析,以评估认知能力(CP)或教育成就(EA)对阅读障碍和注意力缺失之间因果关系的潜在中介作用。我们采用了两种 MVMR 方法(包括 MV IVW 和 MV-Egger)和两步 MR 进行分析。通过 IVW,我们发现阅读障碍的增加与 AD 风险的增加之间存在显著的因果关系(OR = 1.15,95% CI:1.04-1.28,P = 0.006),但 VD、LBD、FTD 或其四个亚型之间不存在因果关系。MR-PRESSO进一步证实了阅读障碍与AD之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联(OR = 1.15,95% CI:1.05-1.27,P = 0.006)。所有敏感性分析都证实了因果关系估计值的可靠性。通过 MV IVW 和中介分析,我们发现在调整 CP 而非 EA 后,阅读障碍与 AD 之间没有因果关系,CP 以 46.32% 的比例中介了阅读障碍对 AD 的总体影响。我们提供了遗传学证据,支持阅读障碍增加对注意力缺失症风险增加的因果效应,而这种效应在很大程度上是由 CP 介导的。通过改善认知功能,阅读活动可能是干预注意力缺失症的一种潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信