{"title":"Teacher Educators’ Use of Formative Feedback During Preservice Teachers’ Simulated Teaching Experiences in Mathematics and Science","authors":"Jamie N. Mikeska, Heather Howell, Devon Kinsey","doi":"10.1007/s10763-024-10489-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of this research study was to identify how teacher educators (TEs) attend to and use formative feedback as they work to support preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) learning. The formative feedback was provided to the TEs as part of recurring instructional cycles within their elementary mathematics or science methods course. In these instructional cycles, their PSTs prepared for, engaged in, and reflected on their ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in a simulated classroom. After each cycle, the TEs received formative information about their PSTs’ discussion performance in the form of a feedback report and a scoring report. The study used qualitative content analysis to analyze and interpret key themes from TEs’ interview data to determine how they used this formative information. Findings suggest the TEs used the formative information provided in the feedback and scoring reports: (a) to gauge their PSTs’ instructional capabilities, (b) to reflect on and make changes to their practice, (c) to evaluate their PSTs’ understanding and interpretation of the feedback reports, and (d) to attend to specific features of their PSTs’ practice. Study results highlight the usefulness of providing TEs with formative information about their PSTs’ ability to engage in specific aspects of a core teaching practice, especially to support identification of areas for improvement and inform future instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14267,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10489-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this research study was to identify how teacher educators (TEs) attend to and use formative feedback as they work to support preservice teachers’ (PSTs’) learning. The formative feedback was provided to the TEs as part of recurring instructional cycles within their elementary mathematics or science methods course. In these instructional cycles, their PSTs prepared for, engaged in, and reflected on their ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in a simulated classroom. After each cycle, the TEs received formative information about their PSTs’ discussion performance in the form of a feedback report and a scoring report. The study used qualitative content analysis to analyze and interpret key themes from TEs’ interview data to determine how they used this formative information. Findings suggest the TEs used the formative information provided in the feedback and scoring reports: (a) to gauge their PSTs’ instructional capabilities, (b) to reflect on and make changes to their practice, (c) to evaluate their PSTs’ understanding and interpretation of the feedback reports, and (d) to attend to specific features of their PSTs’ practice. Study results highlight the usefulness of providing TEs with formative information about their PSTs’ ability to engage in specific aspects of a core teaching practice, especially to support identification of areas for improvement and inform future instruction.
期刊介绍:
The objective of this journal is to publish original, fully peer-reviewed articles on a variety of topics and research methods in both science and mathematics education. The journal welcomes articles that address common issues in mathematics and science education and cross-curricular dimensions more widely. Specific attention will be paid to manuscripts written by authors whose native language is not English and the editors have made arrangements for support in re-writing where appropriate. Contemporary educators highlight the importance of viewing knowledge as context-oriented and not limited to one domain. This concurs with current curriculum reforms worldwide for interdisciplinary and integrated curricula. Modern educational practice also focuses on the use of new technology in assisting instruction which may be easily implemented into such an integrated curriculum. The journal welcomes studies that explore science and mathematics education from different cultural perspectives.