Infant sensitivity to social contingency moderates the predictive link between early maternal reciprocity and infants' emerging social behavior

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Yael Paz, Tahl I. Frenkel
{"title":"Infant sensitivity to social contingency moderates the predictive link between early maternal reciprocity and infants' emerging social behavior","authors":"Yael Paz,&nbsp;Tahl I. Frenkel","doi":"10.1111/desc.13563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>The scientific study of love underscores the importance of dyadic reciprocity in laying the foundation for infants’ social development. While research establishes links between early reciprocity and children's social capacities, some infants appear to benefit from reciprocity more than others. A central feature of reciprocity is its contingent structure, that is, the extent to which maternal behaviors are temporally associated with and contingent upon infants’ dynamically changing cues. As such, infants’ sensitivity to social contingencies may define the extent to which an infant benefits from maternal reciprocity. The current study examined the role of infants’ sensitivity to social contingency (SC) in moderating associations between early maternal reciprocity and subsequent infants’ social behavior. The study followed 157 children (47% females), across the first year of life (4, 10, and 12 months) and at preschool age (48 months). Infants' SC at 4 and 10 months moderated the link between early maternal reciprocity and infants' prosocial behavior observed at 12 months. SC at 10 months moderated the link between early reciprocity and reported peer problems at 48 months. Maternal reciprocity predicted more helping behavior in infancy and fewer peer problems at preschool, but only for infants who displayed high SC. Findings highlight the contingent nature of reciprocal mother-infant interactions revealing that an infant's sensitivity to breaks in social-contingency moderates the developmental benefit of reciprocity. Future research is necessary to directly test the underlying mechanisms of these processes and better understand the individual characteristics of infants’ sensitivity to social contingency and its’ role in typical and atypical development.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Individual differences in infants’ sensitivity to breaks in social contingencies may moderate the extent to which infants benefit from contingent reciprocal maternal behavior (i.e., maternal reciprocity).</li>\n \n <li>Maternal reciprocity predicted more helping behavior in infancy and fewer peer problems at preschool, but only for infants who displayed high sensitivity to breaks in social contingency.</li>\n \n <li>Findings highlight the contingent nature of reciprocal mother-infant interactions revealing that infants’ sensitivity to breaks in social-contingency moderates the developmental benefit of reciprocity.</li>\n \n <li>Findings emphasize the need to develop measurement methods and direct empirical attention to the important yet understudied individual characteristic of infants’ sensitivity to social contingency and its role in shaping social development.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/desc.13563","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scientific study of love underscores the importance of dyadic reciprocity in laying the foundation for infants’ social development. While research establishes links between early reciprocity and children's social capacities, some infants appear to benefit from reciprocity more than others. A central feature of reciprocity is its contingent structure, that is, the extent to which maternal behaviors are temporally associated with and contingent upon infants’ dynamically changing cues. As such, infants’ sensitivity to social contingencies may define the extent to which an infant benefits from maternal reciprocity. The current study examined the role of infants’ sensitivity to social contingency (SC) in moderating associations between early maternal reciprocity and subsequent infants’ social behavior. The study followed 157 children (47% females), across the first year of life (4, 10, and 12 months) and at preschool age (48 months). Infants' SC at 4 and 10 months moderated the link between early maternal reciprocity and infants' prosocial behavior observed at 12 months. SC at 10 months moderated the link between early reciprocity and reported peer problems at 48 months. Maternal reciprocity predicted more helping behavior in infancy and fewer peer problems at preschool, but only for infants who displayed high SC. Findings highlight the contingent nature of reciprocal mother-infant interactions revealing that an infant's sensitivity to breaks in social-contingency moderates the developmental benefit of reciprocity. Future research is necessary to directly test the underlying mechanisms of these processes and better understand the individual characteristics of infants’ sensitivity to social contingency and its’ role in typical and atypical development.

Research Highlights

  • Individual differences in infants’ sensitivity to breaks in social contingencies may moderate the extent to which infants benefit from contingent reciprocal maternal behavior (i.e., maternal reciprocity).
  • Maternal reciprocity predicted more helping behavior in infancy and fewer peer problems at preschool, but only for infants who displayed high sensitivity to breaks in social contingency.
  • Findings highlight the contingent nature of reciprocal mother-infant interactions revealing that infants’ sensitivity to breaks in social-contingency moderates the developmental benefit of reciprocity.
  • Findings emphasize the need to develop measurement methods and direct empirical attention to the important yet understudied individual characteristic of infants’ sensitivity to social contingency and its role in shaping social development.

Abstract Image

婴儿对社会权变的敏感性调节了早期母性互惠与婴儿新兴社会行为之间的预测联系
对爱的科学研究强调了双亲互惠对奠定婴儿社会发展基础的重要性。虽然研究证实了早期互惠与儿童社会能力之间的联系,但有些婴儿似乎比其他婴儿更能从互惠中受益。互惠的一个核心特征是其偶然性结构,即母性行为在多大程度上与婴儿动态变化的线索在时间上相关联并以其为条件。因此,婴儿对社会或然性的敏感性可能决定了婴儿从母婴互惠中获益的程度。本研究探讨了婴儿对社会权变(Social contingency,SC)的敏感性在调节早期母婴互惠与随后婴儿社会行为之间的关联中的作用。该研究对 157 名婴儿(47% 为女性)在出生后第一年(4 个月、10 个月、12 个月)和学龄前(48 个月)进行了跟踪调查。4个月和10个月时婴儿的SC调节了12个月时观察到的早期母亲互惠与婴儿亲社会行为之间的联系。10 个月时的自理能力调节了早期互惠与 48 个月时报告的同伴问题之间的联系。母性互惠预示着婴儿期更多的帮助行为和学龄前更少的同伴问题,但这只适用于表现出高 SC 的婴儿。研究结果强调了母婴互惠互动的偶然性,揭示了婴儿对社会偶然性中断的敏感性调节了互惠对发展的益处。未来的研究有必要直接测试这些过程的潜在机制,并更好地了解婴儿对社会或然性的敏感性的个体特征及其在典型和非典型发展中的作用。 研究亮点 婴儿对社会或然性中断的敏感性的个体差异可能会调节婴儿从或然互惠的母亲行为(即母亲互惠性)中获益的程度。母性互惠预示着婴儿期更多的帮助行为和更少的学前同伴问题,但这只适用于对社会或然性中断表现出高度敏感性的婴儿。研究结果强调了母婴互惠互动的偶然性,揭示了婴儿对社会偶然性中断的敏感性调节了互惠对发展的益处。研究结果强调,有必要开发测量方法,并引导实证研究关注婴儿对社会偶然性的敏感性这一重要但未被充分研究的个体特征及其在塑造社会发展中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信