Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Maziar Changizian, Zahra Shirkhani, Yousef Tamsilian
{"title":"Exploring efficiency: an in-depth analysis of the energy, exergy, and sensitivity in four traditional liquefied natural gas processes","authors":"Maziar Changizian,&nbsp;Zahra Shirkhani,&nbsp;Yousef Tamsilian","doi":"10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg<sup>−1</sup> liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg<sup>−1</sup>. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","volume":"149 17","pages":"9477 - 9499"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10973-024-13476-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the comprehensive analysis of four conventional mixed refrigerant liquefaction processes, namely C3MR-Linde, C3MR-APCI, SMR-Linde, and SMR-APCI, emphasizing energy and exergy perspectives. According to the energy analysis, C3MR-Linde demonstrates a lower energy consumption than the other systems, at 0.271 kWh kg−1 liquefied natural gas, while SMR-Air Products achieves the highest coefficient of performance (COP) at 2.67 kWh kg−1. The exergy analysis provides insights into the exergy efficiency and destruction of components, highlighting the C3MR-Linde process as the most exergy-efficient process, attaining 47.55%. Notably, compressors are identified as the primary sources of exergy destruction, accounting for 52.11%, 52.51%, and 45.39% of the overall cycle exergy destruction in the C3MR-APCI, C3MR-Linde, and SMR-APCI cycles, respectively. Furthermore, this study investigates how certain operational factors affect the COP, specific energy consumption (SEC), and exergy indices. It is observed that each cycle exhibits an optimal pressure drop in the expansion valves, with deviations resulting in a decreased COP and increased SEC. Additionally, changes in the refrigerant molar flow rates demonstrate an inverse relationship between the exergy efficiency and COP, with the SEC being notably more sensitive to such variations than the COP within the studied parameters.

Abstract Image

探索效率:深入分析四种传统液化天然气工艺的能量、放能和敏感性
本研究对 C3MR-Linde、C3MR-APCI、SMR-Linde 和 SMR-APCI 四种传统混合制冷剂液化工艺进行了全面分析,重点从能量和放能角度进行了研究。根据能耗分析,C3MR-Linde 系统的能耗低于其他系统,为 0.271 千瓦时/千克-1 液化天然气,而 SMR-Air Products 系统的性能系数(COP)最高,为 2.67 千瓦时/千克-1。放能分析深入揭示了组件的放能效率和破坏情况,突出表明 C3MR-Linde 工艺是放能效率最高的工艺,达到 47.55%。值得注意的是,压缩机被认为是破坏能量的主要来源,在 C3MR-APCI、C3MR-Linde 和 SMR-APCI 循环中分别占整个循环破坏能量的 52.11%、52.51% 和 45.39%。此外,本研究还探讨了某些运行因素如何影响 COP、比能耗 (SEC) 和放能指数。研究发现,每个循环的膨胀阀都有一个最佳压降,偏差会导致 COP 下降和 SEC 上升。此外,制冷剂摩尔流量的变化显示了放能效和 COP 之间的反比关系,在所研究的参数范围内,SEC 对这种变化的敏感度明显高于 COP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry is a fully peer reviewed journal publishing high quality papers covering all aspects of thermal analysis, calorimetry, and experimental thermodynamics. The journal publishes regular and special issues in twelve issues every year. The following types of papers are published: Original Research Papers, Short Communications, Reviews, Modern Instruments, Events and Book reviews. The subjects covered are: thermogravimetry, derivative thermogravimetry, differential thermal analysis, thermodilatometry, differential scanning calorimetry of all types, non-scanning calorimetry of all types, thermometry, evolved gas analysis, thermomechanical analysis, emanation thermal analysis, thermal conductivity, multiple techniques, and miscellaneous thermal methods (including the combination of the thermal method with various instrumental techniques), theory and instrumentation for thermal analysis and calorimetry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信