{"title":"Implementation challenges of electronic blood transfusion safety systems: Lessons from an international, multi‐site comparative case study","authors":"Stijn Horck, Nick Fahy, Trisha Greenhalgh","doi":"10.1111/tme.13095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundSevere transfusion reactions resulting from errors in matching the correct blood with the correct patient are considered never events. Despite the relative technical simplicity of barcode scanning for patient‐blood bag matching, the adoption and universal application of this safety measure are by no means universal. This study highlights the logistical and institutional challenges associated with spreading, scaling up, and sustaining such IT‐supported safety measures in healthcare.Study Design and MethodsWe report findings from a 5‐year, prospective, multi‐site case study conducted across one hospital in England and three hospitals in the Netherlands. Ethnographic methods, including interviews and observations, were used at each site to investigate the implementation of barcode scanning‐supported safety pathways for blood transfusions.ResultsSignificant variation was observed across the sites in the adoption and implementation of barcode scanning‐supported safety pathways. Despite the potential for reducing transfusion errors, the introduction of this innovation was met with varying levels of success in different settings.DiscussionThis study highlights the critical role of inter‐hospital learning and flexible system design in successfully implementing barcode scanning‐supported safety pathways for blood transfusions. A more structured, national‐level network for knowledge sharing could enhance the spread and sustainability of such innovations across healthcare settings.","PeriodicalId":23306,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion Medicine","volume":"05 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.13095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundSevere transfusion reactions resulting from errors in matching the correct blood with the correct patient are considered never events. Despite the relative technical simplicity of barcode scanning for patient‐blood bag matching, the adoption and universal application of this safety measure are by no means universal. This study highlights the logistical and institutional challenges associated with spreading, scaling up, and sustaining such IT‐supported safety measures in healthcare.Study Design and MethodsWe report findings from a 5‐year, prospective, multi‐site case study conducted across one hospital in England and three hospitals in the Netherlands. Ethnographic methods, including interviews and observations, were used at each site to investigate the implementation of barcode scanning‐supported safety pathways for blood transfusions.ResultsSignificant variation was observed across the sites in the adoption and implementation of barcode scanning‐supported safety pathways. Despite the potential for reducing transfusion errors, the introduction of this innovation was met with varying levels of success in different settings.DiscussionThis study highlights the critical role of inter‐hospital learning and flexible system design in successfully implementing barcode scanning‐supported safety pathways for blood transfusions. A more structured, national‐level network for knowledge sharing could enhance the spread and sustainability of such innovations across healthcare settings.
期刊介绍:
Transfusion Medicine publishes articles on transfusion medicine in its widest context, including blood transfusion practice (blood procurement, pharmaceutical, clinical, scientific, computing and documentary aspects), immunohaematology, immunogenetics, histocompatibility, medico-legal applications, and related molecular biology and biotechnology.
In addition to original articles, which may include brief communications and case reports, the journal contains a regular educational section (based on invited reviews and state-of-the-art reports), technical section (including quality assurance and current practice guidelines), leading articles, letters to the editor, occasional historical articles and signed book reviews. Some lectures from Society meetings that are likely to be of general interest to readers of the Journal may be published at the discretion of the Editor and subject to the availability of space in the Journal.