How Stable Do Multiligament Knee Reconstructions Become?: An Objective Stability and PROMs Study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Vikram Arun Mhaskar, Saif Rahamathulla Sayed, Mahesh Hosmanne, Het Patel, Zoheb Hassan Siddiqui, Garima Varshney
{"title":"How Stable Do Multiligament Knee Reconstructions Become?: An Objective Stability and PROMs Study","authors":"Vikram Arun Mhaskar, Saif Rahamathulla Sayed, Mahesh Hosmanne, Het Patel, Zoheb Hassan Siddiqui, Garima Varshney","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01241-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose of the Study</h3><p>Multiligament injuries (MLKI) of the knee mainly result from high-velocity impacts. This study was done to analyse multilgament knee reconstructions done in a single setting at a minimum 12 month follow-up with objective gait, squat, stability and fluoroscopic examination along with PROMs and compare the individual KD categories. Also, the study analyses the difference between &lt; 30- and &gt; 30-year-olds as well as those who had sporting injuries versus RTAs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methodology</h3><p>All cruciate ligaments were reconstructed arthroscopically. Collateral ligaments were reconstructed using autografts and fixed with interference screws. All were kept non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks on a brace. ROM exercises were begun at the earliest. Gait analysis, stability, balance, squat analysis and fluoroscopic analysis were used to determine the objective outcomes during follow-ups. PROMs were analysed pre- and postoperatively to document the functional activity of the patient. The analysis of the various parameters with objective measurements of the clinical, functional and patient-reported measures was done to assess the outcome in multiligament knee injury patients.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>ACL with MCL was the most common presenting multiligament-involved presentation, with KD3 being the most common pattern of injury. The parameters for contact time, step length, ROM at knee and hip on the normal and operated limbs were near normal and same at a minimum 1-year follow-up with a good stability index. The PROMs improved significantly postop. There was no difference in the results of sporting versus non-sporting injuries, those &lt; 30 and &gt; 30 years and between the individual KD groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The results showed statistically significant improvement in stability and PROMs at follow-up in multiligament reconstructions, but no difference comparing individual KD groups, &lt; 30 and &gt; 30 years age and those injured by RTA s and sporting injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01241-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the Study

Multiligament injuries (MLKI) of the knee mainly result from high-velocity impacts. This study was done to analyse multilgament knee reconstructions done in a single setting at a minimum 12 month follow-up with objective gait, squat, stability and fluoroscopic examination along with PROMs and compare the individual KD categories. Also, the study analyses the difference between < 30- and > 30-year-olds as well as those who had sporting injuries versus RTAs.

Methodology

All cruciate ligaments were reconstructed arthroscopically. Collateral ligaments were reconstructed using autografts and fixed with interference screws. All were kept non-weight-bearing for 6 weeks on a brace. ROM exercises were begun at the earliest. Gait analysis, stability, balance, squat analysis and fluoroscopic analysis were used to determine the objective outcomes during follow-ups. PROMs were analysed pre- and postoperatively to document the functional activity of the patient. The analysis of the various parameters with objective measurements of the clinical, functional and patient-reported measures was done to assess the outcome in multiligament knee injury patients.

Results

ACL with MCL was the most common presenting multiligament-involved presentation, with KD3 being the most common pattern of injury. The parameters for contact time, step length, ROM at knee and hip on the normal and operated limbs were near normal and same at a minimum 1-year follow-up with a good stability index. The PROMs improved significantly postop. There was no difference in the results of sporting versus non-sporting injuries, those < 30 and > 30 years and between the individual KD groups.

Conclusion

The results showed statistically significant improvement in stability and PROMs at follow-up in multiligament reconstructions, but no difference comparing individual KD groups, < 30 and > 30 years age and those injured by RTA s and sporting injuries.

多韧带膝关节重建的稳定性如何?客观稳定性和 PROMs 研究
研究目的 膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKI)主要由高速撞击造成。本研究旨在通过客观的步态、下蹲、稳定性和透视检查以及PROMs,分析在单一环境下进行的多韧带膝关节重建术后至少12个月的随访情况,并比较各个KD类别。此外,该研究还分析了 30 岁与 30 岁之间的差异,以及运动损伤与 RTA 之间的差异。使用自体移植物重建侧韧带,并用干扰螺钉固定。所有患者在 6 周内都要佩戴支具,不能负重。最早开始进行 ROM 运动。步态分析、稳定性、平衡性、下蹲分析和透视分析用于确定随访期间的客观结果。对术前和术后的 PROM 进行了分析,以记录患者的功能活动情况。通过对临床、功能和患者报告的客观测量结果进行各种参数分析,以评估膝关节多韧带损伤患者的疗效。正常肢体和手术肢体的接触时间、步长、膝关节和髋关节的ROM等参数接近正常,且在至少1年的随访中保持一致,稳定性指数良好。术后PROMs明显改善。结论结果显示,多韧带重建术后随访的稳定性和PROMs均有明显改善,但各KD组、30岁和30岁年龄组、RTA损伤组和运动损伤组之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信