Increased Femoral Neck Anteversion is Prevalent in Male Elite Youth Soccer Players with Chronic Ankle Instability

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Osman Coşkun, Serdar Arslan, Gökmen Yapalı, Tuğba Arslan, Engin Dinç, Muhammet Zeki Gültekin
{"title":"Increased Femoral Neck Anteversion is Prevalent in Male Elite Youth Soccer Players with Chronic Ankle Instability","authors":"Osman Coşkun, Serdar Arslan, Gökmen Yapalı, Tuğba Arslan, Engin Dinç, Muhammet Zeki Gültekin","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01245-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The aim of this study was to compare femoral neck anteversion (FNA) and determine the prevalence of increased FNA in male elite youth soccer players with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI). Secondary aims were to evaluate the utility of FNA in predicting CAI and compare ankle and hip muscle strength in the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Materials and methods</h3><p>The study included a total of 44 male elite youth soccer players, 22 with CAI (mean age 16.09 ± 1.34) and 22 without CAI (mean age 16.73 ± 1.28). FNA was measured with Craig’s test, range of motion (ROM) was measured with a universal goniometer, and ankle and hip maximum voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) was measured with a handheld dynamometer.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>The mean FNA angles of the CAI and control groups were 15.82° ± 1.44° and 12.09° ± 2.37°, respectively (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). FNA was greater than 15° in 72% of the CAI group versus 4% of the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). A 1° increase in FNA was associated with threefold higher odds of having CAI (odds ratio 3.06, 95% confidence ratio: 1.37–6.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). Mean ankle eversion and hip abduction MVIS values were 2.67 ± 0.52 Nm/kg and 3.83 ± 0.48 Nm/kg in the CAI group, compared to 3.03 ± 0.58 Nm/kg and 4.46 ± 0.98 Nm/kg in the control group, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Male elite youth soccer players with CAI had greater FNA and were more likely to have increased FNA than those without CAI. They also exhibited ankle eversion and hip abduction muscle strength deficiencies compared to peers without CAI. FNA may be useful as a predictor of CAI in male elite youth soccer players.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01245-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare femoral neck anteversion (FNA) and determine the prevalence of increased FNA in male elite youth soccer players with and without chronic ankle instability (CAI). Secondary aims were to evaluate the utility of FNA in predicting CAI and compare ankle and hip muscle strength in the two groups.

Materials and methods

The study included a total of 44 male elite youth soccer players, 22 with CAI (mean age 16.09 ± 1.34) and 22 without CAI (mean age 16.73 ± 1.28). FNA was measured with Craig’s test, range of motion (ROM) was measured with a universal goniometer, and ankle and hip maximum voluntary isometric strength (MVIS) was measured with a handheld dynamometer.

Results

The mean FNA angles of the CAI and control groups were 15.82° ± 1.44° and 12.09° ± 2.37°, respectively (p > 0.05). FNA was greater than 15° in 72% of the CAI group versus 4% of the control group (p < 0.05). A 1° increase in FNA was associated with threefold higher odds of having CAI (odds ratio 3.06, 95% confidence ratio: 1.37–6.81, p < 0.01). Mean ankle eversion and hip abduction MVIS values were 2.67 ± 0.52 Nm/kg and 3.83 ± 0.48 Nm/kg in the CAI group, compared to 3.03 ± 0.58 Nm/kg and 4.46 ± 0.98 Nm/kg in the control group, respectively (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Male elite youth soccer players with CAI had greater FNA and were more likely to have increased FNA than those without CAI. They also exhibited ankle eversion and hip abduction muscle strength deficiencies compared to peers without CAI. FNA may be useful as a predictor of CAI in male elite youth soccer players.

Abstract Image

患有慢性踝关节不稳的男性青少年精英足球运动员普遍存在股骨颈内翻现象
目的 本研究旨在比较股骨颈内翻(FNA),并确定患有和未患有慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)的男性青少年精英足球运动员中 FNA 增高的发生率。次要目的是评估 FNA 在预测 CAI 方面的效用,并比较两组球员的踝关节和髋关节肌肉力量。材料和方法该研究共包括 44 名男性青少年精英足球运动员,其中 22 人患有 CAI(平均年龄为 16.09±1.34 岁),22 人没有 CAI(平均年龄为 16.73±1.28 岁)。结果 CAI 组和对照组的平均 FNA 角度分别为 15.82° ± 1.44° 和 12.09° ± 2.37°(p > 0.05)。72% 的 CAI 组 FNA 大于 15°,而对照组仅为 4%(p < 0.05)。FNA 每增加 1°,患 CAI 的几率就会增加三倍(几率比 3.06,95% 置信比:1.37-6.81,p < 0.01)。CAI 组的踝关节外翻和髋关节外展 MVIS 平均值分别为 2.67 ± 0.52 牛米/公斤和 3.83 ± 0.48 牛米/公斤,而对照组分别为 3.03 ± 0.58 牛米/公斤和 4.46 ± 0.98 牛米/公斤(p < 0.05)。与无 CAI 的同龄人相比,他们还表现出踝关节外翻和髋关节外展肌肉力量不足。FNA 可能是预测男性青少年精英足球运动员 CAI 的有用指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信