Proximal Fibulectomy for Giant Cell Tumours: What Works!

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Ashwin Prajapati, Harsha S. S. Tadala, Ashish Gulia, Ajay Puri
{"title":"Proximal Fibulectomy for Giant Cell Tumours: What Works!","authors":"Ashwin Prajapati, Harsha S. S. Tadala, Ashish Gulia, Ajay Puri","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01231-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is the most common primary tumor of proximal fibula. Because of its close proximity to vascular structures, common peroneal nerve (CPN) and attachment of lateral collateral ligament (LCL), proximal fibulectomy poses unique challenges. We analyzed oncological and functional outcome of patients who underwent proximal fibulectomy for GCTB of proximal fibula.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Material and methods</h3><p>Between January 2006 and December 2020, 23 patients underwent proximal fibulectomy for GCTB of proximal fibula, four were recurrent tumors. Mean resection length was 9 cm (5 to 15 cm). The LCL and biceps tendon were not reconstructed in 22 cases. The common peroneal nerve was sacrificed in seven patients including three recurrent cases. Functional status was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>There were two vascular complications and one infection. With 4 patients lost to follow up, mean follow up was 90 months (12 to 197). No patient had local or distant recurrence. Mean MSTS score was 26 (21 to 30). Eleven of 23 patients (48%) had loss of common peroneal nerve function with poorer functional outcome. No patient had symptoms suggestive of knee instability.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Proximal fibulectomy is oncologically safe. Reconstruction of the LCL attachment is not mandatory and patients do not have symptomatic knee instability. Functional outcomes are compromised after sacrifice of common peroneal nerve and may be potentially improved with tendon transfers at index surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01231-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is the most common primary tumor of proximal fibula. Because of its close proximity to vascular structures, common peroneal nerve (CPN) and attachment of lateral collateral ligament (LCL), proximal fibulectomy poses unique challenges. We analyzed oncological and functional outcome of patients who underwent proximal fibulectomy for GCTB of proximal fibula.

Material and methods

Between January 2006 and December 2020, 23 patients underwent proximal fibulectomy for GCTB of proximal fibula, four were recurrent tumors. Mean resection length was 9 cm (5 to 15 cm). The LCL and biceps tendon were not reconstructed in 22 cases. The common peroneal nerve was sacrificed in seven patients including three recurrent cases. Functional status was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scoring system.

Results

There were two vascular complications and one infection. With 4 patients lost to follow up, mean follow up was 90 months (12 to 197). No patient had local or distant recurrence. Mean MSTS score was 26 (21 to 30). Eleven of 23 patients (48%) had loss of common peroneal nerve function with poorer functional outcome. No patient had symptoms suggestive of knee instability.

Conclusion

Proximal fibulectomy is oncologically safe. Reconstruction of the LCL attachment is not mandatory and patients do not have symptomatic knee instability. Functional outcomes are compromised after sacrifice of common peroneal nerve and may be potentially improved with tendon transfers at index surgery.

Abstract Image

巨细胞瘤近端纤维切除术:什么有效?
背景骨巨细胞瘤(GCTB)是腓骨近端最常见的原发性肿瘤。由于其非常靠近血管结构、腓总神经(CPN)和外侧副韧带(LCL)的附着点,腓骨近端纤维切除术带来了独特的挑战。我们分析了因腓骨近端 GCTB 而接受近端纤维切除术的患者的肿瘤学和功能预后。材料与方法2006 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月间,23 例患者因腓骨近端 GCTB 而接受了近端纤维切除术,其中 4 例为复发性肿瘤。平均切除长度为9厘米(5至15厘米)。22例患者未重建LCL和肱二头肌腱。7例患者(包括3例复发病例)牺牲了腓总神经。采用肌肉骨骼肿瘤协会(MSTS)评分系统对患者的功能状态进行评估。有4名患者失去了随访机会,平均随访时间为90个月(12至197个月)。没有患者出现局部或远处复发。平均MSTS评分为26分(21至30分)。23名患者中有11名(48%)丧失了腓总神经功能,功能预后较差。结论近端纤维切除术在肿瘤学上是安全的。结论近端纤维切除术在肿瘤学上是安全的,无需重建LCL附件,患者也不会出现膝关节不稳的症状。牺牲腓总神经后,功能效果会受到影响,而在索引手术中进行肌腱转移可能会改善这种情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信