Comparing anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in barn owl (Tyto alba) and common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): A biomonitoring study in an agricultural region of southeastern Spain

IF 7.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
{"title":"Comparing anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in barn owl (Tyto alba) and common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus): A biomonitoring study in an agricultural region of southeastern Spain","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) are commonly used for rodent control, affecting various non-target wildlife species. Here, blood samples from common kestrels (<em>Falco tinnunculus</em>, <em>n</em> = 70 chicks) and barn owls (<em>Tyto alba, n</em> = 54 chicks and 12 adults) from Southeastern Spain were analysed using HPLC-TQ. SGAR prevalence was 68.6% in kestrel chicks, 50% in barn owl chicks and 100% in adult barn owls, with multiple SGARs in both species. Prothrombin time analysis in barn owls revealed a positive correlation with blood ΣSGARs, suggesting a potential adverse effect on coagulation. Analysis of variables potentially influencing SGAR prevalence indicated that, for kestrels, it was only related to the extent of artificial surface, showing no differences across study sites. In owlets, the highest prevalence occurred in the most urbanized study site, with human population density being a key factor. This study highlights species-specific differences in SGAR exposure, likely influenced by ecological traits. Barn owls probably encounter contaminated prey near anthropized areas, with widespread SGAR use and higher presence of target rodents. Conversely, kestrels, hunting a variety of prey often near human settlements, face consistently elevated exposure from multiple sources. Understanding these variations is crucial for effective conservation and minimizing SGAR impact on non-target wildlife.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124016580/pdfft?md5=5646233e1a30a125858307a2312deeb6&pid=1-s2.0-S0269749124016580-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749124016580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) are commonly used for rodent control, affecting various non-target wildlife species. Here, blood samples from common kestrels (Falco tinnunculus, n = 70 chicks) and barn owls (Tyto alba, n = 54 chicks and 12 adults) from Southeastern Spain were analysed using HPLC-TQ. SGAR prevalence was 68.6% in kestrel chicks, 50% in barn owl chicks and 100% in adult barn owls, with multiple SGARs in both species. Prothrombin time analysis in barn owls revealed a positive correlation with blood ΣSGARs, suggesting a potential adverse effect on coagulation. Analysis of variables potentially influencing SGAR prevalence indicated that, for kestrels, it was only related to the extent of artificial surface, showing no differences across study sites. In owlets, the highest prevalence occurred in the most urbanized study site, with human population density being a key factor. This study highlights species-specific differences in SGAR exposure, likely influenced by ecological traits. Barn owls probably encounter contaminated prey near anthropized areas, with widespread SGAR use and higher presence of target rodents. Conversely, kestrels, hunting a variety of prey often near human settlements, face consistently elevated exposure from multiple sources. Understanding these variations is crucial for effective conservation and minimizing SGAR impact on non-target wildlife.

Abstract Image

比较谷仓猫头鹰(Tyto alba)和普通红隼(Falco tinnunculus)接触抗凝血杀鼠剂的情况:西班牙东南部农业区的生物监测研究
第二代抗凝血灭鼠剂 (SGAR) 常用于灭鼠,会对各种非目标野生动物造成影响。在此,我们使用 HPLC-TQ 分析了来自西班牙东南部的普通红隼(= 70 只雏鸟)和谷仓猫头鹰(= 54 只雏鸟和 12 只成年猫头鹰)的血液样本。红隼雏鸟的 SGAR 患病率为 68.6%,谷仓鸮雏鸟为 50%,谷仓鸮成鸟为 100%,两种鸟都有多种 SGAR。对仓鸮凝血酶原时间的分析表明,血液中的ΣSGARs与仓鸮的凝血酶原时间呈正相关,这表明血液中的ΣSGARs可能会对凝血功能产生不利影响。对可能影响 SGAR 发生率的变量进行的分析表明,红隼的 SGAR 发生率只与人工表面的范围有关,在不同的研究地点没有差异。在城市化程度最高的研究地点,小鹰的SGAR发病率最高,而人口密度是一个关键因素。这项研究强调了物种在接触 SGAR 方面的特异性差异,这种差异很可能受到生态特征的影响。谷仓鸮可能会在人类活动区附近遇到受污染的猎物,这些地区广泛使用 SGAR,目标啮齿类动物也较多。相反,经常在人类居住区附近捕食各种猎物的红隼则面临来自多个来源的持续升高的暴露量。了解这些变化对于有效保护和尽量减少 SGAR 对非目标野生动物的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信