Exerting force at the maximal speed drives the increase in power output in elite athletes after 4 weeks of resistance training

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi
{"title":"Exerting force at the maximal speed drives the increase in power output in elite athletes after 4 weeks of resistance training","authors":"Edoardo Lecce, Ruggero Romagnoli, Giorgio Frinolli, Francesco Felici, Maria Francesca Piacentini, Ilenia Bazzucchi","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05604-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>In the present study, we examined how a 4-week intervention of maximal intended velocity (MIVRT) and controlled velocity resistance training (CRT)-induced task-specific responses in expert individuals.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Twenty elite athletes were randomly assigned to either a MIVRT (<i>n</i> = 10) or CRT (<i>n</i> = 10) group, both following the same volume–load training based on the back-squat three times a week but with different intentions in moving load (force–exertion speed). We assessed one-repetition maximum (1RM), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and mean propulsive power (MPP) using a progressive-loading test before and after the intervention. A linear position transducer was used to monitor propulsive velocity in training and testing sessions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Both groups significantly increased their 1RM (CRT: + 12.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.39; MIVRT: + 12.5%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.45). Only the MIVRT group showed a significant improvement in MPV (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) across different stepping loads, while both groups improved in MPP (MIVRT: + 22.4%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>d</i> = 0.54; CRT: + 8.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.04, <i>d</i> = 0.17).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>MIVRT induced significant adaptations in MPV and MPP at various loads (%1RM), underlining its specificity in targeting these parameters. Despite similar enhancements in 1RM, the distinct training protocols suggest that strength gains may stem from either maximal intent in moving loads or longer times under tension. This study highlights the role of execution speed in optimizing power outcomes, emphasizing task specificity as paramount to elicit physiological adaptations in chronically strength-trained individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05604-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

In the present study, we examined how a 4-week intervention of maximal intended velocity (MIVRT) and controlled velocity resistance training (CRT)-induced task-specific responses in expert individuals.

Methods

Twenty elite athletes were randomly assigned to either a MIVRT (n = 10) or CRT (n = 10) group, both following the same volume–load training based on the back-squat three times a week but with different intentions in moving load (force–exertion speed). We assessed one-repetition maximum (1RM), mean propulsive velocity (MPV), and mean propulsive power (MPP) using a progressive-loading test before and after the intervention. A linear position transducer was used to monitor propulsive velocity in training and testing sessions.

Results

Both groups significantly increased their 1RM (CRT: + 12.3%, p < 0.001, d = 0.39; MIVRT: + 12.5%, p < 0.001, d = 0.45). Only the MIVRT group showed a significant improvement in MPV (p < 0.01) across different stepping loads, while both groups improved in MPP (MIVRT: + 22.4%, p < 0.001, d = 0.54; CRT: + 8.1%, p = 0.04, d = 0.17).

Conclusions

MIVRT induced significant adaptations in MPV and MPP at various loads (%1RM), underlining its specificity in targeting these parameters. Despite similar enhancements in 1RM, the distinct training protocols suggest that strength gains may stem from either maximal intent in moving loads or longer times under tension. This study highlights the role of execution speed in optimizing power outcomes, emphasizing task specificity as paramount to elicit physiological adaptations in chronically strength-trained individuals.

Abstract Image

精英运动员在接受 4 周阻力训练后,以最大速度发力可提高输出功率
方法20名精英运动员被随机分配到MIVRT组(n = 10)或CRT组(n = 10),这两组每周进行三次相同的基于背蹲的运动量-负荷训练,但移动负荷(力-用力速度)的意图不同。我们在干预前后使用渐进加载测试评估了单次重复最大负重(1RM)、平均推进速度(MPV)和平均推进功率(MPP)。结果两组的 1RM 均有显著提高(CRT:+ 12.3%,p < 0.001,d = 0.39;MIVRT:+ 12.5%,p < 0.001,d = 0.45)。在不同的踏步负荷下,只有 MIVRT 组的 MPV 有显著改善(p <0.01),而两组的 MPP 均有改善(MIVRT:+ 22.4%,p <0.001,d = 0.54;CRT:+ 8.1%,p = 0.04,d = 0.17)。尽管1RM的提高幅度相似,但不同的训练方案表明,力量的提高可能源于移动负荷时的最大意图或在张力下的更长时间。这项研究强调了执行速度在优化力量结果中的作用,并强调任务的特异性对于激发长期力量训练者的生理适应性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信