Composite activity type and stride-specific energy expenditure estimation model for thigh-worn accelerometry

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Claas Lendt, Niklas Hansen, Ingo Froböse, Tom Stewart
{"title":"Composite activity type and stride-specific energy expenditure estimation model for thigh-worn accelerometry","authors":"Claas Lendt, Niklas Hansen, Ingo Froböse, Tom Stewart","doi":"10.1186/s12966-024-01646-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurately measuring energy expenditure during physical activity outside of the laboratory is challenging, especially on a large scale. Thigh-worn accelerometers have gained popularity due to the possibility to accurately detect physical activity types. The use of machine learning techniques for activity classification and energy expenditure prediction may improve accuracy over current methods. Here, we developed a novel composite energy expenditure estimation model by combining an activity classification model with a stride specific energy expenditure model for walking, running, and cycling. We first trained a supervised deep learning activity classification model using pooled data from available adult accelerometer datasets. The composite energy expenditure model was then developed and validated using additional data based on a sample of 69 healthy adult participants (49% female; age = 25.2 ± 5.8 years) who completed a standardised activity protocol with indirect calorimetry as the reference measure. The activity classification model showed an overall accuracy of 99.7% across all five activity types during validation. The composite model for estimating energy expenditure achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 10.9%. For running, walking, and cycling, the composite model achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 6.6%, 7.9% and 16.1%, respectively. The integration of thigh-worn accelerometers with machine learning models provides a highly accurate method for classifying physical activity types and estimating energy expenditure. Our novel composite model approach improves the accuracy of energy expenditure measurements and supports better monitoring and assessment methods in non-laboratory settings.","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01646-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately measuring energy expenditure during physical activity outside of the laboratory is challenging, especially on a large scale. Thigh-worn accelerometers have gained popularity due to the possibility to accurately detect physical activity types. The use of machine learning techniques for activity classification and energy expenditure prediction may improve accuracy over current methods. Here, we developed a novel composite energy expenditure estimation model by combining an activity classification model with a stride specific energy expenditure model for walking, running, and cycling. We first trained a supervised deep learning activity classification model using pooled data from available adult accelerometer datasets. The composite energy expenditure model was then developed and validated using additional data based on a sample of 69 healthy adult participants (49% female; age = 25.2 ± 5.8 years) who completed a standardised activity protocol with indirect calorimetry as the reference measure. The activity classification model showed an overall accuracy of 99.7% across all five activity types during validation. The composite model for estimating energy expenditure achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 10.9%. For running, walking, and cycling, the composite model achieved a mean absolute percentage error of 6.6%, 7.9% and 16.1%, respectively. The integration of thigh-worn accelerometers with machine learning models provides a highly accurate method for classifying physical activity types and estimating energy expenditure. Our novel composite model approach improves the accuracy of energy expenditure measurements and supports better monitoring and assessment methods in non-laboratory settings.
用于大腿佩戴式加速度计的复合活动类型和特定步长能量消耗估算模型
在实验室外精确测量体力活动时的能量消耗具有挑战性,尤其是在大规模测量时。由于大腿佩戴式加速度计可以准确检测体力活动类型,因此越来越受欢迎。与目前的方法相比,使用机器学习技术进行活动分类和能量消耗预测可能会提高准确性。在这里,我们通过将活动分类模型与步行、跑步和骑自行车的步幅特定能量消耗模型相结合,开发了一种新型的复合能量消耗估算模型。我们首先利用现有成人加速度计数据集的集合数据训练了一个有监督的深度学习活动分类模型。然后,我们利用 69 名健康成年参与者(49% 为女性;年龄 = 25.2 ± 5.8 岁)的额外数据开发并验证了综合能量消耗模型,这些参与者完成了以间接热量计为参考测量方法的标准化活动方案。在验证过程中,活动分类模型对所有五种活动类型的总体准确率为 99.7%。估算能量消耗的综合模型的平均绝对百分比误差为 10.9%。对于跑步、步行和骑自行车,综合模型的平均绝对百分比误差分别为 6.6%、7.9% 和 16.1%。大腿佩戴式加速度计与机器学习模型的整合,为体力活动类型的分类和能量消耗的估算提供了一种高度精确的方法。我们的新型复合模型方法提高了能量消耗测量的准确性,并支持在非实验室环境下采用更好的监测和评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信