Relationships between soil test phosphorus and county‐level agricultural surplus phosphorus

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qicheng Tang, Owen W. Duckworth, Daniel R. Obenour, Stephanie B. Kulesza, Nathan A. Slaton, Andrew H. Whitaker, Natalie G. Nelson
{"title":"Relationships between soil test phosphorus and county‐level agricultural surplus phosphorus","authors":"Qicheng Tang, Owen W. Duckworth, Daniel R. Obenour, Stephanie B. Kulesza, Nathan A. Slaton, Andrew H. Whitaker, Natalie G. Nelson","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.20622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National nutrient inventories provide surplus phosphorus (P) estimates derived from county‐scale mass balance calculations using P inputs from manure and fertilizer sales and P outputs from crop yield data. Although bioavailable P and surplus P are often correlated at the field scale, few studies have investigated the relationship between measured soil P concentrations of large‐scale soil testing programs and inventory‐based surplus P estimates. In this study, we assessed the relationship between national surplus P data from the NuGIS dataset and laboratory‐measured soil test phosphorus (STP) at the county scale for Arkansas, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. For optimal periods of surplus P aggregation, surplus P was positively correlated with STP based on both Pearson (Arkansas: <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.65, North Carolina: <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.45, Oklahoma: <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.52) and Spearman correlation coefficients (Arkansas: <jats:italic>ρ</jats:italic> = 0.57, North Carolina: <jats:italic>ρ</jats:italic> = 0.28, and Oklahoma: <jats:italic>ρ</jats:italic> = 0.66). Based on Pearson correlations, the optimal surplus P aggregation periods were 10, 30, and 4 years for AR, NC, and OK, respectively. On average, STP was more strongly correlated with surplus P than with individual P inventory components (fertilizer, manure, and crop removal), except in North Carolina. In Arkansas and North Carolina, manure P was positively correlated with STP, and fertilizer P was negatively correlated with STP. Altogether, results suggest that surplus P moderately correlates with STP concentrations, but aggregation period and location‐specific factors influence the strength of the relationship.","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National nutrient inventories provide surplus phosphorus (P) estimates derived from county‐scale mass balance calculations using P inputs from manure and fertilizer sales and P outputs from crop yield data. Although bioavailable P and surplus P are often correlated at the field scale, few studies have investigated the relationship between measured soil P concentrations of large‐scale soil testing programs and inventory‐based surplus P estimates. In this study, we assessed the relationship between national surplus P data from the NuGIS dataset and laboratory‐measured soil test phosphorus (STP) at the county scale for Arkansas, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. For optimal periods of surplus P aggregation, surplus P was positively correlated with STP based on both Pearson (Arkansas: r = 0.65, North Carolina: r = 0.45, Oklahoma: r = 0.52) and Spearman correlation coefficients (Arkansas: ρ = 0.57, North Carolina: ρ = 0.28, and Oklahoma: ρ = 0.66). Based on Pearson correlations, the optimal surplus P aggregation periods were 10, 30, and 4 years for AR, NC, and OK, respectively. On average, STP was more strongly correlated with surplus P than with individual P inventory components (fertilizer, manure, and crop removal), except in North Carolina. In Arkansas and North Carolina, manure P was positively correlated with STP, and fertilizer P was negatively correlated with STP. Altogether, results suggest that surplus P moderately correlates with STP concentrations, but aggregation period and location‐specific factors influence the strength of the relationship.
土壤测试磷与县级农业剩余磷之间的关系
国家养分清单利用粪肥和化肥销售的磷输入以及作物产量数据的磷输出,通过县级质量平衡计算得出剩余磷(P)估算值。虽然生物可利用磷和过剩磷在田间尺度上通常是相关的,但很少有研究调查大规模土壤检测项目测得的土壤磷浓度与基于清单的过剩磷估算值之间的关系。在这项研究中,我们评估了来自 NuGIS 数据集的全国过剩磷数据与实验室测量的阿肯色州、北卡罗来纳州和俄克拉荷马州县级土壤测试磷 (STP) 之间的关系。根据皮尔逊相关系数(阿肯色州:r = 0.65;北卡罗来纳州:r = 0.45;俄克拉荷马州:r = 0.52)和斯皮尔曼相关系数(阿肯色州:ρ = 0.57;北卡罗来纳州:ρ = 0.28;俄克拉荷马州:ρ = 0.66),在过剩磷聚集的最佳时期,过剩磷与土壤测试磷呈正相关。根据皮尔逊相关性,阿肯色州、北卡罗来纳州和俄克拉荷马州的最佳剩余 P 聚集期分别为 10 年、30 年和 4 年。平均而言,除北卡罗来纳州外,STP 与剩余磷的相关性比与单个磷存量成分(肥料、粪便和作物清除)的相关性更强。在阿肯色州和北卡罗来纳州,粪肥 P 与 STP 呈正相关,而肥料 P 与 STP 呈负相关。总之,研究结果表明,剩余钾与 STP 浓度呈中度相关,但聚集期和特定地点的因素会影响这种关系的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信