Exploring the relationship between coach-initiated motivational climate and athlete well-being, resilience, and psychological safety in competitive sport teams

IF 1.5 4区教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1177/17479541241278602

Achuthan Shanmugaratnam, Colin D McLaren, Meredith Schertzinger, Mark W Bruner

{"title":"Exploring the relationship between coach-initiated motivational climate and athlete well-being, resilience, and psychological safety in competitive sport teams","authors":"Achuthan Shanmugaratnam, Colin D McLaren, Meredith Schertzinger, Mark W Bruner","doi":"10.1177/17479541241278602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate coach-initiated motivational climate and its relationship with athlete well-being, resilience, and psychological safety in competitive sport. In addition to independent relationships between task- and ego-related climates and the study outcomes, this research also explored the potential additive effects of task and ego climate together to understand if a task climate can buffer against the negative impacts of an ego climate. Self-report survey data were collected from competitive soccer players across Ontario, Canada ( N = 298; Mage = 20.38; 58.72% male). Using multiple linear regression, a perceived task-related climate was a significant positive predictor of well-being ( ß = .33), resilience ( ß = .31), and psychological safety ( ß = .54, all ps < .001). A higher perceived ego-related climate was a significant negative predictor of psychological safety ( ß = −.23, p < .001), and not significantly related to well-being and resilience. Partial support for the additive effect of task- and ego-related climate together was found for psychological safety, but not well-being or resilience. Specifically, athletes in the latent profile characterized by average task and higher ego scored higher on psychological safety compared with lower task and higher ego climate perceptions. The increase in psychological safety between these two profiles was observed despite both having higher ego-related climates. Although future research is required, the findings offer meaningful contributions to theory and practice in the context of competitive soccer teams.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241278602","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate coach-initiated motivational climate and its relationship with athlete well-being, resilience, and psychological safety in competitive sport. In addition to independent relationships between task- and ego-related climates and the study outcomes, this research also explored the potential additive effects of task and ego climate together to understand if a task climate can buffer against the negative impacts of an ego climate. Self-report survey data were collected from competitive soccer players across Ontario, Canada ( N = 298; Mage = 20.38; 58.72% male). Using multiple linear regression, a perceived task-related climate was a significant positive predictor of well-being ( ß = .33), resilience ( ß = .31), and psychological safety ( ß = .54, all ps < .001). A higher perceived ego-related climate was a significant negative predictor of psychological safety ( ß = −.23, p < .001), and not significantly related to well-being and resilience. Partial support for the additive effect of task- and ego-related climate together was found for psychological safety, but not well-being or resilience. Specifically, athletes in the latent profile characterized by average task and higher ego scored higher on psychological safety compared with lower task and higher ego climate perceptions. The increase in psychological safety between these two profiles was observed despite both having higher ego-related climates. Although future research is required, the findings offer meaningful contributions to theory and practice in the context of competitive soccer teams.

查看原文本刊更多论文

探索竞技运动队中教练发起的激励氛围与运动员幸福感、恢复力和心理安全之间的关系

本研究的目的是调查在竞技体育中由教练引发的激励氛围及其与运动员的幸福感、恢复力和心理安全之间的关系。除了与任务和自我相关的氛围与研究结果之间的独立关系外，本研究还探讨了任务和自我氛围的潜在叠加效应，以了解任务氛围是否能缓冲自我氛围的负面影响。研究收集了加拿大安大略省竞技足球运动员的自我报告调查数据（人数 = 298；年龄 = 20.38；58.72% 为男性）。通过多元线性回归，感知到的与任务相关的氛围对幸福感（ ß = .33）、复原力（ ß = .31）和心理安全（ ß = .54, all ps < .001）有显著的正向预测作用。较高的自我相关氛围对心理安全有显著的负向预测作用（ß = -.23, p <.001），但与幸福感和复原力的关系不大。在心理安全方面，任务和自我相关氛围的叠加效应得到了部分支持，但在幸福感和复原力方面却没有得到支持。具体地说，与低任务和高自我气候感知的运动员相比，潜在特征为平均任务和高自我的运动员在心理安全方面得分更高。尽管这两种情况下的运动员都具有较高的自我相关氛围，但这两种情况下的运动员的心理安全感都有所提高。虽然未来的研究还需要继续，但这些发现为足球竞技团队的理论和实践提供了有意义的贡献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

15.80%

发文量

208

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.