Metrics for quantifying the efficiency of atmospheric CO2 reduction by marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR)

IF 5.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Kana Yamamoto, Tim DeVries, David A Siegel
{"title":"Metrics for quantifying the efficiency of atmospheric CO2 reduction by marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR)","authors":"Kana Yamamoto, Tim DeVries, David A Siegel","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ad7477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is gaining interest as a tool to meet global climate goals. Because the response of the ocean–atmosphere system to mCDR takes years to centuries, modeling is required to assess the impact of mCDR on atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> reduction. Here, we use a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to quantify the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> reduction in response to a CDR perturbation. We define two metrics to characterize the atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> response to both instantaneous ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) and direct air capture (DAC): the cumulative additionality (<italic toggle=\"yes\">α</italic>) measures the reduction in atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> relative to the magnitude of the CDR perturbation, while the relative efficiency (<italic toggle=\"yes\">ϵ</italic>) quantifies the cumulative additionality of mCDR relative to that of DAC. For DAC, <italic toggle=\"yes\">α</italic> is 100% immediately following CDR deployment, but declines to roughly 50% by 100 years post-deployment as the ocean degasses CO<sub>2</sub> in response to the removal of carbon from the atmosphere. For instantaneous OAE, <italic toggle=\"yes\">α</italic> is zero initially and reaches a maximum of 40%–90% several years to decades later, depending on regional CO<sub>2</sub> equilibration rates and ocean circulation processes. The global mean <italic toggle=\"yes\">ϵ</italic> approaches 100% after 40 years, showing that instantaneous OAE is nearly as effective as DAC after several decades. However, there are significant geographic variations, with <italic toggle=\"yes\">ϵ</italic> approaching 100% most rapidly in the low latitudes while <italic toggle=\"yes\">ϵ</italic> stays well under 100% for decades to centuries near deep and intermediate water formation sites. These metrics provide a quantitative framework for evaluating sequestration timescales and carbon market valuation that can be applied to any mCDR strategy.","PeriodicalId":11747,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research Letters","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad7477","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is gaining interest as a tool to meet global climate goals. Because the response of the ocean–atmosphere system to mCDR takes years to centuries, modeling is required to assess the impact of mCDR on atmospheric CO2 reduction. Here, we use a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to quantify the atmospheric CO2 reduction in response to a CDR perturbation. We define two metrics to characterize the atmospheric CO2 response to both instantaneous ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) and direct air capture (DAC): the cumulative additionality (α) measures the reduction in atmospheric CO2 relative to the magnitude of the CDR perturbation, while the relative efficiency (ϵ) quantifies the cumulative additionality of mCDR relative to that of DAC. For DAC, α is 100% immediately following CDR deployment, but declines to roughly 50% by 100 years post-deployment as the ocean degasses CO2 in response to the removal of carbon from the atmosphere. For instantaneous OAE, α is zero initially and reaches a maximum of 40%–90% several years to decades later, depending on regional CO2 equilibration rates and ocean circulation processes. The global mean ϵ approaches 100% after 40 years, showing that instantaneous OAE is nearly as effective as DAC after several decades. However, there are significant geographic variations, with ϵ approaching 100% most rapidly in the low latitudes while ϵ stays well under 100% for decades to centuries near deep and intermediate water formation sites. These metrics provide a quantitative framework for evaluating sequestration timescales and carbon market valuation that can be applied to any mCDR strategy.
量化海洋二氧化碳去除(mCDR)减少大气二氧化碳效率的指标
海洋二氧化碳去除(mCDR)作为实现全球气候目标的一种工具,正受到越来越多的关注。由于海洋-大气系统对 mCDR 的响应需要数年到数百年的时间,因此需要建立模型来评估 mCDR 对大气二氧化碳减排的影响。在这里,我们使用海洋-大气耦合模型来量化大气中二氧化碳的减少量对 CDR 扰动的响应。我们定义了两个指标来描述大气二氧化碳对瞬时海洋碱度增强(OAE)和直接空气捕获(DAC)的响应:累积额外性(α)衡量大气二氧化碳相对于 CDR 扰动幅度的减少量,而相对效率(ϵ)量化了 mCDR 相对于 DAC 的累积额外性。对于 DAC,α 在 CDR 部署后立即达到 100%,但到部署后 100 年,随着海洋对大气中碳的清除而使二氧化碳降解,α 大约会下降到 50%。对于瞬时 OAE,α 最初为零,几年到几十年后达到 40%-90% 的最大值,这取决于区域二氧化碳平衡率和海洋环流过程。全球平均ϵ在 40 年后接近 100%,表明瞬时 OAE 在几十年后几乎与 DAC 一样有效。不过,地域差异也很大,低纬度地区的ϵ接近 100%的速度最快,而在深水和中层水形成地点附近,ϵ在几十年到几百年的时间里都远低于 100%。这些指标为评估封存时间尺度和碳市场估值提供了一个量化框架,可应用于任何 mCDR 战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Research Letters
Environmental Research Letters 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
763
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Research Letters (ERL) is a high-impact, open-access journal intended to be the meeting place of the research and policy communities concerned with environmental change and management. The journal''s coverage reflects the increasingly interdisciplinary nature of environmental science, recognizing the wide-ranging contributions to the development of methods, tools and evaluation strategies relevant to the field. Submissions from across all components of the Earth system, i.e. land, atmosphere, cryosphere, biosphere and hydrosphere, and exchanges between these components are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信