Association between pre-stroke frailty status and stroke risk and impact on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,660,328 participants

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Shu-Fan Chen, Hai-Han Li, Zi-Ning Guo, Ke-Yu Ling, Xiao-Li Yu, Fei Liu, Xiao-Ping Zhu, Xiaoping Zhu
{"title":"Association between pre-stroke frailty status and stroke risk and impact on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,660,328 participants","authors":"Shu-Fan Chen,&nbsp;Hai-Han Li,&nbsp;Zi-Ning Guo,&nbsp;Ke-Yu Ling,&nbsp;Xiao-Li Yu,&nbsp;Fei Liu,&nbsp;Xiao-Ping Zhu,&nbsp;Xiaoping Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02845-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The prevalence of frailty is increasing, and it is associated with increased risk of diseases and adverse outcomes. Although substantial research has focused on post-stroke frailty, understanding of pre-stroke frailty remains limited. Our aim was to synthesize literature on pre-stroke frailty and stroke risk to explore their relationship and impact on prognosis. A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted to identify cohort studies published until October 28, 2023. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s test. Finally, we included 11 studies (<i>n</i> = 1,660,328 participants). The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke risk associated with pre-stroke frailty compared to non-frail individuals was 1.72 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.46–2.02, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 69.2%, Begg’s test: <i>p</i> = 0.536). The pooled HRs for mortality and the pooled relative risk (RRs) modified Rankin Scale (mRs) associated with pre-stroke frailty were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.10–2.56, <i>p</i> = 0.136, <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 49.9%, Begg’s test: <i>p</i> = 0.296) and 3.11 (95% CI: 1.77–5.46, <i>p</i> = 0.192, <i>I</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 39.4%, Begg’s test: <i>p</i> = 1.000), respectively. In conclusion, pre-stroke frailty is strongly associated with stroke risk and impacts its prognosis, irrespective of the measurement method. Future research should focus on prospective studies to assess the effects of early intervention for frailty. This has significant implications for primary healthcare services and frailty management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02845-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02845-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of frailty is increasing, and it is associated with increased risk of diseases and adverse outcomes. Although substantial research has focused on post-stroke frailty, understanding of pre-stroke frailty remains limited. Our aim was to synthesize literature on pre-stroke frailty and stroke risk to explore their relationship and impact on prognosis. A systematic search of multiple databases was conducted to identify cohort studies published until October 28, 2023. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the I² statistic, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg’s test. Finally, we included 11 studies (n = 1,660,328 participants). The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for stroke risk associated with pre-stroke frailty compared to non-frail individuals was 1.72 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.46–2.02, p = 0.002, I2 = 69.2%, Begg’s test: p = 0.536). The pooled HRs for mortality and the pooled relative risk (RRs) modified Rankin Scale (mRs) associated with pre-stroke frailty were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.10–2.56, p = 0.136, I2 = 49.9%, Begg’s test: p = 0.296) and 3.11 (95% CI: 1.77–5.46, p = 0.192, I2 = 39.4%, Begg’s test: p = 1.000), respectively. In conclusion, pre-stroke frailty is strongly associated with stroke risk and impacts its prognosis, irrespective of the measurement method. Future research should focus on prospective studies to assess the effects of early intervention for frailty. This has significant implications for primary healthcare services and frailty management.

Abstract Image

中风前虚弱状态与中风风险之间的关系及其对预后的影响:对 1,660,328 名参与者的系统回顾和荟萃分析
虚弱症的发病率在不断上升,它与疾病和不良后果的风险增加有关。尽管大量研究都集中在中风后虚弱方面,但对中风前虚弱的了解仍然有限。我们的目的是综合有关中风前虚弱和中风风险的文献,探讨它们之间的关系及其对预后的影响。我们对多个数据库进行了系统检索,以确定截至 2023 年 10 月 28 日发表的队列研究。采用随机效应模型进行了元分析。用 I² 统计量评估异质性,用 Begg's 检验评估发表偏倚。最后,我们纳入了 11 项研究(n = 1,660,328 名参与者)。与非虚弱个体相比,与卒中前虚弱相关的卒中风险的汇总危险比(HRs)为 1.72(95% 置信区间,CI:1.46-2.02,P = 0.002,I2 = 69.2%,Begg 检验:P = 0.536)。与卒中前虚弱相关的死亡率汇总 HRs 和修正 Rankin 量表(mRs)汇总相对风险 (RRs) 分别为 1.68(95% CI:1.10-2.56,p = 0.136,I2 = 49.9%,Begg 检验:p = 0.296)和 3.11(95% CI:1.77-5.46,p = 0.192,I2 = 39.4%,Begg 检验:p = 1.000)。总之,无论采用哪种测量方法,卒中前虚弱都与卒中风险密切相关并影响其预后。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性研究,以评估早期干预虚弱的效果。这对初级医疗保健服务和虚弱管理具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信