Effect of Bimagrumab on body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Mehmet Kanbay, Dimitrie Siriopol, Sidar Copur, Nuri Baris Hasbal, Mustafa Güldan, Kam Kalantar-Zadeh, Tania Garfias-Veitl, Stephan von Haehling
{"title":"Effect of Bimagrumab on body composition: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mehmet Kanbay,&nbsp;Dimitrie Siriopol,&nbsp;Sidar Copur,&nbsp;Nuri Baris Hasbal,&nbsp;Mustafa Güldan,&nbsp;Kam Kalantar-Zadeh,&nbsp;Tania Garfias-Veitl,&nbsp;Stephan von Haehling","doi":"10.1007/s40520-024-02825-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sarcopenia, a condition marked by progressive muscle mass and function decline, presents significant challenges in aging populations and those with chronic illnesses. Current standard treatments such as dietary interventions and exercise programs are often unsustainable. There is increasing interest in pharmacological interventions like bimagrumab, a monoclonal antibody that promotes muscle hypertrophy by inhibiting muscle atrophy ligands. Bimagrumab has shown effectiveness in various conditions, including sarcopenia.</p><h3>Aim</h3><p>The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of bimagrumab treatment on both physical performance and body composition among patients diagnosed with sarcopenia.</p><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This meta-analysis follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid/Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases up to June 2024 using appropriate Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to bimagrumab and sarcopenia. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of bimagrumab on physical performance (e.g., muscle strength, gait speed, six-minute walk distance) and body composition (e.g., muscle volume, fat-free body mass, fat body mass) in patients with sarcopenia. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers using a standardized form, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>From an initial search yielding 46 records, we screened titles, abstracts, and full texts to include seven RCTs in our meta-analysis. Bimagrumab treatment significantly increased thigh muscle volume (mean difference [MD] 5.29%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.08% to 6.50%, P &lt; 0.001; moderate heterogeneity χ2 = 6.41, I2 = 38%, P = 0.17) and fat-free body mass (MD 1.90 kg, 95% CI 1.57 kg to 2.23 kg, P &lt; 0.001; moderate heterogeneity χ2 = 8.60, I2 = 30%, P = 0.20), while decreasing fat body mass compared to placebo (MD − 4.55 kg, 95% CI − 5.08 kg to − 4.01 kg, P &lt; 0.001; substantial heterogeneity χ2 = 27.44, I2 = 89%, P &lt; 0.001). However, no significant improvement was observed in muscle strength or physical performance measures such as gait speed and six-minute walk distance with bimagrumab treatment, except among participants with slower baseline walking speeds or distances.</p><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the effects of bimagrumab on sarcopenic patients, highlighting its significant improvements in body composition parameters but limited impact on functional outcomes. The observed heterogeneity in outcomes across studies underscores the need for cautious interpretation, considering variations in study populations, treatment durations, and outcome assessments. While bimagrumab shows promise as a safe pharmacological intervention for enhancing muscle mass and reducing fat mass in sarcopenia, its minimal effects on muscle strength and broader physical performance suggest potential limitations in translating body composition improvements into functional gains. Further research is needed to clarify its long-term efficacy, optimal dosing regimens, and potential benefits for specific subgroups of sarcopenic patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7720,"journal":{"name":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40520-024-02825-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Clinical and Experimental Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40520-024-02825-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Sarcopenia, a condition marked by progressive muscle mass and function decline, presents significant challenges in aging populations and those with chronic illnesses. Current standard treatments such as dietary interventions and exercise programs are often unsustainable. There is increasing interest in pharmacological interventions like bimagrumab, a monoclonal antibody that promotes muscle hypertrophy by inhibiting muscle atrophy ligands. Bimagrumab has shown effectiveness in various conditions, including sarcopenia.

Aim

The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the impact of bimagrumab treatment on both physical performance and body composition among patients diagnosed with sarcopenia.

Materials and methods

This meta-analysis follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid/Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases up to June 2024 using appropriate Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords related to bimagrumab and sarcopenia. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of bimagrumab on physical performance (e.g., muscle strength, gait speed, six-minute walk distance) and body composition (e.g., muscle volume, fat-free body mass, fat body mass) in patients with sarcopenia. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers using a standardized form, with discrepancies resolved through discussion or consultation with a third reviewer.

Results

From an initial search yielding 46 records, we screened titles, abstracts, and full texts to include seven RCTs in our meta-analysis. Bimagrumab treatment significantly increased thigh muscle volume (mean difference [MD] 5.29%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.08% to 6.50%, P < 0.001; moderate heterogeneity χ2 = 6.41, I2 = 38%, P = 0.17) and fat-free body mass (MD 1.90 kg, 95% CI 1.57 kg to 2.23 kg, P < 0.001; moderate heterogeneity χ2 = 8.60, I2 = 30%, P = 0.20), while decreasing fat body mass compared to placebo (MD − 4.55 kg, 95% CI − 5.08 kg to − 4.01 kg, P < 0.001; substantial heterogeneity χ2 = 27.44, I2 = 89%, P < 0.001). However, no significant improvement was observed in muscle strength or physical performance measures such as gait speed and six-minute walk distance with bimagrumab treatment, except among participants with slower baseline walking speeds or distances.

Discussion and conclusion

This meta-analysis provides valuable insights into the effects of bimagrumab on sarcopenic patients, highlighting its significant improvements in body composition parameters but limited impact on functional outcomes. The observed heterogeneity in outcomes across studies underscores the need for cautious interpretation, considering variations in study populations, treatment durations, and outcome assessments. While bimagrumab shows promise as a safe pharmacological intervention for enhancing muscle mass and reducing fat mass in sarcopenia, its minimal effects on muscle strength and broader physical performance suggest potential limitations in translating body composition improvements into functional gains. Further research is needed to clarify its long-term efficacy, optimal dosing regimens, and potential benefits for specific subgroups of sarcopenic patients.

Abstract Image

比马单抗对身体成分的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景肌肉疏松症是一种以肌肉质量和功能逐渐下降为特征的疾病,给老龄化人群和慢性病患者带来了巨大挑战。目前的标准治疗方法,如饮食干预和运动计划,往往难以为继。人们对 bimagrumab 等药理干预措施越来越感兴趣,这种单克隆抗体可通过抑制肌肉萎缩配体促进肌肉肥大。本荟萃分析的主要目的是评估 bimagrumab 治疗对确诊为肌肉疏松症患者的体能表现和身体组成的影响。材料与方法本荟萃分析遵循系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南。截至 2024 年 6 月,我们使用与 bimagrumab 和肌肉疏松症相关的适当医学主题词表 (MeSH) 和关键词系统地检索了 PubMed、Ovid/Medline、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 数据库。符合条件的研究均为随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验评估了 bimagrumab 对肌肉疏松症患者的体能(如肌肉力量、步态速度、六分钟步行距离)和身体成分(如肌肉体积、无脂肪体质量、脂肪体质量)的影响。数据提取由两名审稿人使用标准表格独立完成,不一致之处可通过与第三名审稿人讨论或咨询来解决。结果从最初搜索到的 46 条记录中,我们筛选了标题、摘要和全文,将 7 项 RCT 纳入荟萃分析。Bimagrumab治疗可显着增加大腿肌肉体积(平均差[MD] 5.29%,95% 置信区间[CI] 4.08% 至 6.50%,P < 0.001;中度异质性 χ2 = 6.41,I2 = 38%,P = 0.17)和无脂肪体重(MD 1.90 kg,95% CI 1.57 kg 至 2.23 kg,P <0.001;中等异质性 χ2 = 8.60,I2 = 30%,P = 0.20),而与安慰剂相比,脂肪体质量下降(MD - 4.55 kg,95% CI - 5.08 kg to - 4.01 kg,P <0.001;实质性异质性 χ2 = 27.44,I2 = 89%,P <0.001)。然而,除了基线步行速度或距离较慢的参与者外,bimagrumab 治疗对肌肉力量或身体表现指标(如步态速度和六分钟步行距离)没有明显改善。讨论与结论这项荟萃分析为了解 bimagrumab 对肌肉疏松患者的影响提供了宝贵的见解,突出了其对身体成分参数的明显改善,但对功能结果的影响有限。考虑到研究人群、治疗持续时间和结果评估的差异,观察到的各研究结果的异质性强调了谨慎解释的必要性。虽然 bimagrumab 是一种安全的药物干预方法,可提高肌肉疏松症患者的肌肉质量并减少脂肪量,但它对肌肉力量和更广泛的体能表现的影响甚微,这表明在将身体成分改善转化为功能提高方面存在潜在的局限性。还需要进一步研究,以明确其长期疗效、最佳给药方案以及对特定亚组肌肉疏松症患者的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Aging clinical and experimental research offers a multidisciplinary forum on the progressing field of gerontology and geriatrics. The areas covered by the journal include: biogerontology, neurosciences, epidemiology, clinical gerontology and geriatric assessment, social, economical and behavioral gerontology. “Aging clinical and experimental research” appears bimonthly and publishes review articles, original papers and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信