The iterative development and refinement of health psychology theories through formal, dynamical systems modelling: a scoping review and initial expert-derived 'best practice' recommendations.

IF 6.6 1区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2024.2400977

Olga Perski,Amber Copeland,Jim Allen,Misha Pavel,Daniel E Rivera,Eric Hekler,Nelli Hankonen,Guillaume Chevance

{"title":"The iterative development and refinement of health psychology theories through formal, dynamical systems modelling: a scoping review and initial expert-derived 'best practice' recommendations.","authors":"Olga Perski,Amber Copeland,Jim Allen,Misha Pavel,Daniel E Rivera,Eric Hekler,Nelli Hankonen,Guillaume Chevance","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2024.2400977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scoping review aimed to synthesise methodological steps taken by researchers in the development of formal, dynamical systems models of health psychology theories. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore in July 2023. We included studies of any design providing that they reported on the development or refinement of a formal, dynamical systems model unfolding at the within-person level, with no restrictions on population or setting. A narrative synthesis with frequency analyses was conducted. A total of 17 modelling projects reported across 29 studies were included. Formal modelling efforts have largely been concentrated to a small number of interdisciplinary teams in the United States (79.3%). The models aimed to better understand dynamic processes (69.0%) or inform the development of adaptive interventions (31.0%). Models typically aimed to formalise the Social Cognitive Theory (31.0%) or the Self-Regulation Theory (17.2%) and varied in complexity (range: 3-30 model components). Only 3.4% of studies reported involving stakeholders in the modelling process and 10.3% drew on Open Science practices. We conclude by proposing an initial set of expert-derived 'best practice' recommendations. Formal, dynamical systems modelling is poised to help health psychologists develop and refine theories, ultimately leading to more potent interventions.","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":"264 1","pages":"1-44"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2400977","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to synthesise methodological steps taken by researchers in the development of formal, dynamical systems models of health psychology theories. We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the ACM Digital Library and IEEE Xplore in July 2023. We included studies of any design providing that they reported on the development or refinement of a formal, dynamical systems model unfolding at the within-person level, with no restrictions on population or setting. A narrative synthesis with frequency analyses was conducted. A total of 17 modelling projects reported across 29 studies were included. Formal modelling efforts have largely been concentrated to a small number of interdisciplinary teams in the United States (79.3%). The models aimed to better understand dynamic processes (69.0%) or inform the development of adaptive interventions (31.0%). Models typically aimed to formalise the Social Cognitive Theory (31.0%) or the Self-Regulation Theory (17.2%) and varied in complexity (range: 3-30 model components). Only 3.4% of studies reported involving stakeholders in the modelling process and 10.3% drew on Open Science practices. We conclude by proposing an initial set of expert-derived 'best practice' recommendations. Formal, dynamical systems modelling is poised to help health psychologists develop and refine theories, ultimately leading to more potent interventions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

通过正式的动态系统建模迭代发展和完善健康心理学理论：范围综述和初步的专家 "最佳实践 "建议。

本范围界定综述旨在综合研究人员在开发健康心理学理论的正式动力系统模型时所采取的方法步骤。我们检索了 2023 年 7 月的 MEDLINE、PsycINFO、ACM 数字图书馆和 IEEE Xplore。我们收录了任何设计的研究，只要这些研究报告了在个人层面上展开的正式动态系统模型的发展或完善情况，对人群或环境没有任何限制。我们对这些研究进行了叙述性综合和频率分析。共纳入了 29 项研究中的 17 个建模项目。正式建模工作主要集中在美国的少数跨学科团队（79.3%）。这些模型旨在更好地了解动态过程（69.0%）或为适应性干预措施的开发提供信息（31.0%）。模型通常旨在使社会认知理论（31.0%）或自我调节理论（17.2%）正规化，其复杂程度各不相同（范围：3-30 个模型组成部分）。只有 3.4% 的研究报告称利益相关者参与了建模过程，10.3% 的研究报告称利用了开放科学实践。最后，我们提出了一套初步的专家 "最佳实践 "建议。正式的动力系统建模有望帮助健康心理学家发展和完善理论，最终实现更有效的干预。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

21.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.