Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrew D. Ho, Terry A. Ackerman, Deborah L. Bandalos, Derek C. Briggs, Howard T. Everson, Susan M. Lottridge, Matthew J. Madison, Sandip Sinharay, Michael C. Rodriguez, Michael Russell, Alina A. von Davier, Stefanie A. Wind
{"title":"Foundational Competencies in Educational Measurement: A Rejoinder","authors":"Andrew D. Ho,&nbsp;Terry A. Ackerman,&nbsp;Deborah L. Bandalos,&nbsp;Derek C. Briggs,&nbsp;Howard T. Everson,&nbsp;Susan M. Lottridge,&nbsp;Matthew J. Madison,&nbsp;Sandip Sinharay,&nbsp;Michael C. Rodriguez,&nbsp;Michael Russell,&nbsp;Alina A. von Davier,&nbsp;Stefanie A. Wind","doi":"10.1111/emip.12623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What are foundational competencies in educational measurement? We published a framework for these foundational competencies in this journal (Ackerman et al. 2024) and were grateful to receive eight commentaries raising a number of important questions about the framework and its implications. We identified five cross-cutting recommendations among the eight commentaries relating to (1) our process and purpose, (2) Artificial Intelligence, (3) ethical competencies, (4) qualitative, critical, and culturally responsive commentaries, and (5) intersecting professions in, for example, classroom assessment and content development. In this rejoinder, we respond to these five recommendations and to each of the eight commentaries in turn. We hope that discussion and consensus about foundational competencies in educational measurement continue to advance in our journals and our field.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12623","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What are foundational competencies in educational measurement? We published a framework for these foundational competencies in this journal (Ackerman et al. 2024) and were grateful to receive eight commentaries raising a number of important questions about the framework and its implications. We identified five cross-cutting recommendations among the eight commentaries relating to (1) our process and purpose, (2) Artificial Intelligence, (3) ethical competencies, (4) qualitative, critical, and culturally responsive commentaries, and (5) intersecting professions in, for example, classroom assessment and content development. In this rejoinder, we respond to these five recommendations and to each of the eight commentaries in turn. We hope that discussion and consensus about foundational competencies in educational measurement continue to advance in our journals and our field.

教育测量的基本能力:再论
什么是教育测量的基本能力?我们在本刊上发表了这些基础能力的框架(阿克曼等人),并收到了八篇评论,对该框架及其影响提出了许多重要问题,对此我们深表感谢。我们在这八篇评论中发现了五项交叉建议,分别涉及:(1) 我们的过程和目的;(2) 人工智能;(3) 道德能力;(4) 定性、批判性和文化响应性评论;(5) 课堂评估和内容开发等交叉专业。在本复函中,我们将依次对这五项建议和八篇评论逐一作出回应。我们希望有关教育测量基础能力的讨论和共识能在我们的期刊和领域中继续推进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信