Exploration of environmentally friendly processes for converting CO2 into propanol through direct hydrogenation

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Ming-Ting Lee, Hsuan-Han Chiu, Bor-Yih Yu
{"title":"Exploration of environmentally friendly processes for converting CO2 into propanol through direct hydrogenation","authors":"Ming-Ting Lee, Hsuan-Han Chiu, Bor-Yih Yu","doi":"10.1016/j.jiec.2024.08.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study firstly explores six process configurations for the conversion of CO to propanol via direct hydrogenation. The variations in the proposed configurations lie in the technologies used for off-gas treatment (such as pressure swing adsorption, oxyfuel combustion, autothermal reforming, and chemical absorption) and the intensification of separation (including the incorporation of the hydration reaction of ethylene oxide) within the process. Energy efficiency analysis, techno-economic analysis (in minimum required selling price, MRSP), and life cycle assessment (on global warming potential, GWP) were conducted to evaluate all proposed schemes. Overall, this study suggests that enhancing the selectivity towards propanol and implementing a suitable off-gas treatment strategy are crucial for this process. Based on the findings, we recommend Scheme 4, which involves auto-thermal reforming for off-gas treatment, as the optimal configuration. It leads to an energy efficiency of 45.33 %. Despite the higher MRSP (3.12 USD/kg when using grey H, 7.45 USD/kg when using green H, commercial process: 1.4 to 1.6 USD/kg), it significantly reduces GWP (3.19 kg-CO-eq/kg when using grey H, 1.59 kg-CO-eq/kg when using green H) created from the conventional process (6.77 kg-CO-eq/kg). Given appropriate economic incentives, the proposed process could serve as a more environmentally friendly option for propanol production.","PeriodicalId":363,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry","volume":"266 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2024.08.030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study firstly explores six process configurations for the conversion of CO to propanol via direct hydrogenation. The variations in the proposed configurations lie in the technologies used for off-gas treatment (such as pressure swing adsorption, oxyfuel combustion, autothermal reforming, and chemical absorption) and the intensification of separation (including the incorporation of the hydration reaction of ethylene oxide) within the process. Energy efficiency analysis, techno-economic analysis (in minimum required selling price, MRSP), and life cycle assessment (on global warming potential, GWP) were conducted to evaluate all proposed schemes. Overall, this study suggests that enhancing the selectivity towards propanol and implementing a suitable off-gas treatment strategy are crucial for this process. Based on the findings, we recommend Scheme 4, which involves auto-thermal reforming for off-gas treatment, as the optimal configuration. It leads to an energy efficiency of 45.33 %. Despite the higher MRSP (3.12 USD/kg when using grey H, 7.45 USD/kg when using green H, commercial process: 1.4 to 1.6 USD/kg), it significantly reduces GWP (3.19 kg-CO-eq/kg when using grey H, 1.59 kg-CO-eq/kg when using green H) created from the conventional process (6.77 kg-CO-eq/kg). Given appropriate economic incentives, the proposed process could serve as a more environmentally friendly option for propanol production.
探索通过直接氢化将二氧化碳转化为丙醇的环保工艺
本研究首先探讨了通过直接加氢将一氧化碳转化为丙醇的六种工艺配置。拟议配置的不同之处在于废气处理技术(如变压吸附、富氧燃烧、自热重整和化学吸收)和工艺中分离强化(包括环氧乙烷水合反应的加入)。为评估所有建议方案,还进行了能效分析、技术经济分析(按最低所需售价计算)和生命周期评估(按全球升温潜能值计算)。总之,本研究表明,提高对丙醇的选择性和实施合适的废气处理策略对该工艺至关重要。根据研究结果,我们推荐方案 4 作为最佳配置,该方案涉及废气处理的自动热重整。该方案的能源效率为 45.33%。尽管 MRSP 较高(使用灰色 H 时为 3.12 美元/千克,使用绿色 H 时为 7.45 美元/千克,商业工艺则为 1.4 至 1.6 美元/千克),但该方案的能效比仍较高:1.4 至 1.6 美元/千克),但与传统工艺(6.77 千克-CO-eq/千克)相比,它显著降低了全球升温潜能值(使用灰色 H 时为 3.19 千克-CO-eq/千克,使用绿色 H 时为 1.59 千克-CO-eq/千克)。如果有适当的经济激励措施,拟议的工艺可作为丙醇生产中更环保的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
6.60%
发文量
639
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry is published monthly in English by the Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. JIEC brings together multidisciplinary interests in one journal and is to disseminate information on all aspects of research and development in industrial and engineering chemistry. Contributions in the form of research articles, short communications, notes and reviews are considered for publication. The editors welcome original contributions that have not been and are not to be published elsewhere. Instruction to authors and a manuscript submissions form are printed at the end of each issue. Bulk reprints of individual articles can be ordered. This publication is partially supported by Korea Research Foundation and the Korean Federation of Science and Technology Societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信