Minimalist economic management, deferred revenue regime and aid dependency: Explaining contradictory post‐war statebuilding aims

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Kambaiz Rafi
{"title":"Minimalist economic management, deferred revenue regime and aid dependency: Explaining contradictory post‐war statebuilding aims","authors":"Kambaiz Rafi","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.13427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyses a contradiction in the liberal approach to post‐war statebuilding. The form of the state is seen to aim for the establishment of a centralised maximalist administration when the state's <jats:italic>de jure</jats:italic> economic policy makes its revenue dependant on market‐generated private sector taxes that are either inadequate or its institutions are part of the reconstruction process. This conflation de facto leads to dependency on official development assistance (ODA), mainly administered through exogenous‐to‐state agencies that undermine the nascent state's bureaucratic development. The paper introduces the concept of <jats:italic>deferred revenue regime</jats:italic> and argues that dependency on ODA is one empirical symptom of the contradiction in the liberal approach to statebuilding. Using a high‐profile recent example in an instrumental case study, Afghanistan, from 2002 to 2021, the paper develops a diachronic sequencing of significant policy decisions to suggest temporal causality between economic management and ODA dependency, relying on primary data and stylised statistics. The findings contribute to post‐war statebuilding, institutionalism and the political economy of aid.","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper analyses a contradiction in the liberal approach to post‐war statebuilding. The form of the state is seen to aim for the establishment of a centralised maximalist administration when the state's de jure economic policy makes its revenue dependant on market‐generated private sector taxes that are either inadequate or its institutions are part of the reconstruction process. This conflation de facto leads to dependency on official development assistance (ODA), mainly administered through exogenous‐to‐state agencies that undermine the nascent state's bureaucratic development. The paper introduces the concept of deferred revenue regime and argues that dependency on ODA is one empirical symptom of the contradiction in the liberal approach to statebuilding. Using a high‐profile recent example in an instrumental case study, Afghanistan, from 2002 to 2021, the paper develops a diachronic sequencing of significant policy decisions to suggest temporal causality between economic management and ODA dependency, relying on primary data and stylised statistics. The findings contribute to post‐war statebuilding, institutionalism and the political economy of aid.
最低限度的经济管理、递延收入制度和援助依赖:解释相互矛盾的战后国家建设目标
本文分析了自由主义战后国家建设方法中的一个矛盾。当国家法律上的经济政策使其收入依赖于市场产生的私营部门税收时,国家的形式被视为旨在建立中央集权的最高行政机构,而这些税收要么不足,要么其机构是重建进程的一部分。这种混淆事实上导致了对官方发展援助(ODA)的依赖,而官方发展援助主要是通过外源到国家的机构来管理的,这些机构破坏了新生国家的官僚发展。本文介绍了递延收入制度的概念,并认为对官方发展援助的依赖是自由主义国家建设方法中矛盾的一个经验症状。本文利用 2002 年至 2021 年期间阿富汗这一备受瞩目的近期工具性案例研究,对重大政策决定进行了非同步排序,并依靠原始数据和风格化统计数据,提出了经济管理与官方发展援助依赖性之间的时间因果关系。研究结果有助于战后国家建设、制度主义和援助的政治经济学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信