The Learning Assessment Process in Higher Education: A Grounded Theory Approach

IF 2.5 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Claudia H. Aguayo-Hernández, Alejandro Sánchez Guerrero, Patricia Vázquez-Villegas
{"title":"The Learning Assessment Process in Higher Education: A Grounded Theory Approach","authors":"Claudia H. Aguayo-Hernández, Alejandro Sánchez Guerrero, Patricia Vázquez-Villegas","doi":"10.3390/educsci14090984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to understand university professors’ perspectives on the learning assessment process, including its importance during teaching and learning, their conceptualization, and their considerations in their practices. The research used a grounded theory approach to recognize evaluation as a dialogical and intersubjective space. The methodology consisted of an open survey and a semi-structured interview with faculty professors from a university in northern Mexico. The findings highlighted the importance of educational institutions, emphasizing that faculties prioritize evaluating quality based on relevance, alignment with learning objectives, continuity throughout the process, and feedback. These aspects align with recent approaches that consider evaluation as a process that promotes learning, as evidenced by the high saturation rate in the theoretical sampling. Furthermore, the study revealed that the institution’s educational model, curricular design, and evaluation policies significantly influence the faculty members’ perspective. As a result, educational institutions must consider these factors when formulating an evaluation model, thereby making the research directly applicable to the work of educational policymakers and university professors.","PeriodicalId":11472,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to understand university professors’ perspectives on the learning assessment process, including its importance during teaching and learning, their conceptualization, and their considerations in their practices. The research used a grounded theory approach to recognize evaluation as a dialogical and intersubjective space. The methodology consisted of an open survey and a semi-structured interview with faculty professors from a university in northern Mexico. The findings highlighted the importance of educational institutions, emphasizing that faculties prioritize evaluating quality based on relevance, alignment with learning objectives, continuity throughout the process, and feedback. These aspects align with recent approaches that consider evaluation as a process that promotes learning, as evidenced by the high saturation rate in the theoretical sampling. Furthermore, the study revealed that the institution’s educational model, curricular design, and evaluation policies significantly influence the faculty members’ perspective. As a result, educational institutions must consider these factors when formulating an evaluation model, thereby making the research directly applicable to the work of educational policymakers and university professors.
高等教育中的学习评估过程:基础理论方法
本研究旨在了解大学教授对学习评价过程的看法,包括学习评价在教学过程中的重要性、他们的观念以及他们在实践中的考虑。研究采用基础理论方法,将评价视为一个对话和主体间空间。研究方法包括对墨西哥北部一所大学的教授进行开放式调查和半结构式访谈。研究结果突出了教育机构的重要性,强调教师优先考虑基于相关性、与学习目标的一致性、整个过程的连续性和反馈的质量评价。这些方面与最近将评价视为促进学习的过程的方法相一致,理论抽样的高饱和率就证明了这一点。此外,研究还显示,教育机构的教育模式、课程设计和评价政策对教师的观点有很大影响。因此,教育机构在制定评价模式时必须考虑这些因素,从而使研究直接适用于教育政策制定者和大学教授的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education Sciences
Education Sciences Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
770
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信