Bumble bees do not avoid field-realistic but innocuous concentrations of cadmium and copper

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Antoine Gekière, Luna Breuer, Luca Dorio, Dimitri Evrard, Maryse Vanderplanck, Denis Michez
{"title":"Bumble bees do not avoid field-realistic but innocuous concentrations of cadmium and copper","authors":"Antoine Gekière, Luna Breuer, Luca Dorio, Dimitri Evrard, Maryse Vanderplanck, Denis Michez","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02802-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bee populations are facing numerous stressors globally, including environmental pollution by trace metals and metalloids. Understanding whether bees can detect and avoid these pollutants in their food is pivotal, as avoidance abilities may mitigate their exposure to xenobiotics. While these pollutants are known to induce sublethal effects in bees, such as disrupting physiological mechanisms, their potential impacts on locomotive abilities, fat metabolism, and reproductive physiology remain poorly understood. In this study, utilising workers of the buff-tailed bumble bee and two prevalent trace metals, namely cadmium and copper, we aimed to address these knowledge gaps for field-realistic concentrations. Our findings reveal that workers did not reject field-realistic concentrations of cadmium and copper in sucrose solutions. Moreover, they did not reject lethal concentrations of cadmium, although they rejected lethal concentrations of copper. Additionally, we observed no significant effects of field-realistic concentrations of these metals on the walking and flying activities of workers, nor on their fat metabolism and reproductive physiology. Overall, our results suggest that bumble bees may not avoid cadmium and copper at environmental concentrations, but ingestion of these metals in natural settings may not adversely affect locomotive abilities, fat metabolism, or reproductive physiology. However, given the conservative nature of our study, we still recommend future research to employ higher concentrations over longer durations to mimic conditions in heavily polluted areas (i.e., mine surrounding). Furthermore, investigations should ascertain whether field-realistic concentrations of metals exert no impact on bee larvae.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02802-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bee populations are facing numerous stressors globally, including environmental pollution by trace metals and metalloids. Understanding whether bees can detect and avoid these pollutants in their food is pivotal, as avoidance abilities may mitigate their exposure to xenobiotics. While these pollutants are known to induce sublethal effects in bees, such as disrupting physiological mechanisms, their potential impacts on locomotive abilities, fat metabolism, and reproductive physiology remain poorly understood. In this study, utilising workers of the buff-tailed bumble bee and two prevalent trace metals, namely cadmium and copper, we aimed to address these knowledge gaps for field-realistic concentrations. Our findings reveal that workers did not reject field-realistic concentrations of cadmium and copper in sucrose solutions. Moreover, they did not reject lethal concentrations of cadmium, although they rejected lethal concentrations of copper. Additionally, we observed no significant effects of field-realistic concentrations of these metals on the walking and flying activities of workers, nor on their fat metabolism and reproductive physiology. Overall, our results suggest that bumble bees may not avoid cadmium and copper at environmental concentrations, but ingestion of these metals in natural settings may not adversely affect locomotive abilities, fat metabolism, or reproductive physiology. However, given the conservative nature of our study, we still recommend future research to employ higher concentrations over longer durations to mimic conditions in heavily polluted areas (i.e., mine surrounding). Furthermore, investigations should ascertain whether field-realistic concentrations of metals exert no impact on bee larvae.

Abstract Image

大黄蜂不会避开野外现实但无害浓度的镉和铜
蜜蜂种群在全球范围内面临着众多压力,包括痕量金属和类金属造成的环境污染。了解蜜蜂能否从食物中检测到并避开这些污染物至关重要,因为避开污染物的能力可以减轻蜜蜂暴露于异种生物的程度。虽然已知这些污染物会对蜜蜂产生亚致死效应,如干扰生理机制,但它们对蜜蜂的运动能力、脂肪代谢和生殖生理的潜在影响仍鲜为人知。在这项研究中,我们利用水尾熊蜂的工蜂和两种普遍存在的痕量金属(即镉和铜),旨在针对现场实际浓度解决这些知识空白。我们的研究结果表明,工蜂并不排斥蔗糖溶液中的镉和铜的实际浓度。此外,虽然他们拒绝接受致死浓度的铜,但并不拒绝接受致死浓度的镉。此外,我们还观察到,这些金属的野外实际浓度对工蜂的行走和飞行活动没有明显影响,对它们的脂肪代谢和生殖生理也没有明显影响。总之,我们的研究结果表明,熊蜂可能无法避免环境浓度下的镉和铜,但在自然环境中摄入这些金属可能不会对运动能力、脂肪代谢或生殖生理产生不利影响。不过,鉴于我们研究的保守性,我们仍建议未来的研究采用更高浓度、更长时间的研究,以模拟严重污染地区(如矿山周围)的条件。此外,调查应确定实地实际浓度的金属是否对蜜蜂幼虫没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信