Performance evaluation of microbial fuel cells for bioelectricity generation: influence of potential scan-rate and real-time external load

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
I. Meshack Simeon, A. Gbabo, R. Freitag
{"title":"Performance evaluation of microbial fuel cells for bioelectricity generation: influence of potential scan-rate and real-time external load","authors":"I. Meshack Simeon, A. Gbabo, R. Freitag","doi":"10.1007/s13762-024-05989-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The electrochemical performance of microbial fuel cells is conventionally assessed through linear sweep voltammetry at predefined potential scan rates. Nevertheless, this approach frequently falls short in representing the long-term behavior of microbial fuel cells under actual external loads, highlighting the need for a standardized evaluation method incorporating both linear sweep voltammetry and external loads. To address this gap, this study evaluates the performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells under different loads and scan rates. The MFCs were tested with external loads of 1200, 470, and 270 Ω, derived from maximum power points of polarization sweeps at scan rates of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mV/s at two operational phases. Power estimates at these scan rates were 61.96, 87.88, and 166.68 mW/m<sup>2</sup> at current densities of 116.5, 229.6, and 403 mA/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. In the initial two hours, average power densities with 1200, 470, and 270 Ω were 73 ± 16.7, 36.3 ± 42, and 88.5 ± 120.1 mW/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Over the long term, the fuel cells under constant loading with resistance estimated at 0.1 mV/s showed average power 73.7% and 89.1% higher than those with resistances estimated at 0.5 mV/s and 1 mV/s, respectively, indicating that higher scan rates lead to overestimation of power. Although initially underestimated, the 0.1 mV/s scan rate more accurately reflected the true long-term performance of the fuel cells. This study emphasizes the importance of using appropriate scan rates for linear sweep voltammetry to obtain realistic long-term performance estimates of microbial fuel cells under real-time loads.</p>","PeriodicalId":589,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-05989-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electrochemical performance of microbial fuel cells is conventionally assessed through linear sweep voltammetry at predefined potential scan rates. Nevertheless, this approach frequently falls short in representing the long-term behavior of microbial fuel cells under actual external loads, highlighting the need for a standardized evaluation method incorporating both linear sweep voltammetry and external loads. To address this gap, this study evaluates the performance of single-chamber microbial fuel cells under different loads and scan rates. The MFCs were tested with external loads of 1200, 470, and 270 Ω, derived from maximum power points of polarization sweeps at scan rates of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 mV/s at two operational phases. Power estimates at these scan rates were 61.96, 87.88, and 166.68 mW/m2 at current densities of 116.5, 229.6, and 403 mA/m2, respectively. In the initial two hours, average power densities with 1200, 470, and 270 Ω were 73 ± 16.7, 36.3 ± 42, and 88.5 ± 120.1 mW/m2, respectively. Over the long term, the fuel cells under constant loading with resistance estimated at 0.1 mV/s showed average power 73.7% and 89.1% higher than those with resistances estimated at 0.5 mV/s and 1 mV/s, respectively, indicating that higher scan rates lead to overestimation of power. Although initially underestimated, the 0.1 mV/s scan rate more accurately reflected the true long-term performance of the fuel cells. This study emphasizes the importance of using appropriate scan rates for linear sweep voltammetry to obtain realistic long-term performance estimates of microbial fuel cells under real-time loads.

Abstract Image

用于生物发电的微生物燃料电池的性能评估:电位扫描速率和实时外部负载的影响
微生物燃料电池的电化学性能通常通过预定电位扫描速率下的线性扫描伏安法进行评估。然而,这种方法往往无法反映微生物燃料电池在实际外部负载下的长期行为,因此需要一种同时包含线性扫描伏安法和外部负载的标准化评估方法。为了弥补这一不足,本研究评估了单室微生物燃料电池在不同负载和扫描速率下的性能。MFC 在 1200、470 和 270 Ω 的外部负载下进行了测试,这些负载是在两个工作阶段以 0.1、0.5 和 1 mV/s 的扫描速率进行极化扫描的最大功率点得出的。这些扫描速率下的功率估计值分别为 61.96、87.88 和 166.68 mW/m2,电流密度分别为 116.5、229.6 和 403 mA/m2。在最初的两个小时内,1200、470 和 270 Ω 的平均功率密度分别为 73 ± 16.7、36.3 ± 42 和 88.5 ± 120.1 mW/m2。在长期恒定负载条件下,电阻估计值为 0.1 mV/s 的燃料电池的平均功率比电阻估计值为 0.5 mV/s 和 1 mV/s 的燃料电池分别高出 73.7% 和 89.1%,这表明较高的扫描速率会导致功率被高估。虽然最初估计过低,但 0.1 mV/s 扫描速率更准确地反映了燃料电池的真实长期性能。这项研究强调了线性扫描伏安法使用适当扫描速率的重要性,以便在实时负载下获得微生物燃料电池真实的长期性能估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.50%
发文量
806
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology (IJEST) is an international scholarly refereed research journal which aims to promote the theory and practice of environmental science and technology, innovation, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: peer reviewed original research articles, case and technical reports, reviews and analyses papers, short communications and notes to the editor, in interdisciplinary information on the practice and status of research in environmental science and technology, both natural and man made. The main aspects of research areas include, but are not exclusive to; environmental chemistry and biology, environments pollution control and abatement technology, transport and fate of pollutants in the environment, concentrations and dispersion of wastes in air, water, and soil, point and non-point sources pollution, heavy metals and organic compounds in the environment, atmospheric pollutants and trace gases, solid and hazardous waste management; soil biodegradation and bioremediation of contaminated sites; environmental impact assessment, industrial ecology, ecological and human risk assessment; improved energy management and auditing efficiency and environmental standards and criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信