Development of the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP) for characterizing instructor active-learning follow-up behaviors

Xinjian Cen, Maci Kight, Rachel Lee, Petra Kranzfelder, Stanley M Lo, Jeffrey Maloy, Melinda T Owens
{"title":"Development of the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP) for characterizing instructor active-learning follow-up behaviors","authors":"Xinjian Cen, Maci Kight, Rachel Lee, Petra Kranzfelder, Stanley M Lo, Jeffrey Maloy, Melinda T Owens","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.20.608824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instructors can provide feedback to their class in multiple ways. One way is through their follow-up behaviors, which are the specific strategies instructors implement after active learning activities. These behaviors could play an important role in student learning as students can receive feedback from the instructor. However, there is little research on the effects of different types of follow-up behaviors. Follow-up after active learning can be seen as a form of discourse between the instructor and the entire class. Previous researchers developed the Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP) to analyze discourse between the instructor and individual students or small groups. We used CDOP as a starting point to develop and validate a new protocol, the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP), to characterize instructional follow-up behaviors to the entire class after active-learning activities. We then used FUDOP to characterize follow-up behaviors of multiple instructors in introductory biology courses at three different universities. We measured consistent differences in these behaviors across instructors but not within instructors, demonstrating that instructors may engage in consistent follow-up behaviors. FUDOP could allow instructors and researchers to better measure and analyze follow-up behaviors and their effects, which could in turn provide guidance to instructors and faculty developers.","PeriodicalId":501568,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv - Scientific Communication and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.20.608824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Instructors can provide feedback to their class in multiple ways. One way is through their follow-up behaviors, which are the specific strategies instructors implement after active learning activities. These behaviors could play an important role in student learning as students can receive feedback from the instructor. However, there is little research on the effects of different types of follow-up behaviors. Follow-up after active learning can be seen as a form of discourse between the instructor and the entire class. Previous researchers developed the Classroom Discourse Observation Protocol (CDOP) to analyze discourse between the instructor and individual students or small groups. We used CDOP as a starting point to develop and validate a new protocol, the Follow-Up Discourse Observation Protocol (FUDOP), to characterize instructional follow-up behaviors to the entire class after active-learning activities. We then used FUDOP to characterize follow-up behaviors of multiple instructors in introductory biology courses at three different universities. We measured consistent differences in these behaviors across instructors but not within instructors, demonstrating that instructors may engage in consistent follow-up behaviors. FUDOP could allow instructors and researchers to better measure and analyze follow-up behaviors and their effects, which could in turn provide guidance to instructors and faculty developers.
开发用于描述教师主动学习后续行为的后续话语观察协议 (FUDOP)
教员可以通过多种方式向班级提供反馈。其中一种方式是通过他们的后续行为,即教师在积极学习活动后实施的具体策略。这些行为可以在学生学习中发挥重要作用,因为学生可以从教师那里获得反馈。然而,有关不同类型的跟进行为效果的研究却很少。主动学习后的跟进可以看作是教师与全班学生之间的一种对话形式。之前的研究人员开发了课堂话语观察协议(CDOP),用于分析教师与个别学生或小组之间的话语。我们以 CDOP 为起点,开发并验证了一种新的协议,即 "后续话语观察协议"(FUDOP),用于描述主动学习活动后教师对全班学生的后续教学行为。随后,我们在三所不同大学的生物入门课程中使用 FUDOP 对多位教师的跟进行为进行了描述。我们测得不同教师之间的跟进行为存在一致的差异,但教师内部的差异并不明显,这表明教师的跟进行为可能是一致的。FUDOP 可以让教师和研究人员更好地测量和分析跟进行为及其效果,从而为教师和师资开发人员提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信