The representation of Australians living with dementia in voluntary assisted dying research: A scoping review

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Adrienne Matthys, Belinda Cash, Bernadette Moorhead
{"title":"The representation of Australians living with dementia in voluntary assisted dying research: A scoping review","authors":"Adrienne Matthys, Belinda Cash, Bernadette Moorhead","doi":"10.1111/ajag.13371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesTo critically examine which stakeholders are participating in voluntary assisted dying (VAD) research, to identify the representation of Australians living with dementia.MethodsA scoping review of peer‐reviewed literature to examine which stakeholders are represented in Australian VAD research was conducted. This review was informed by the Arksey and O'Malley Framework for Scoping Reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Searches were conducted systematically across key academic databases to gather Australian research articles written in English that were published between 2017 and August 2023.ResultsAfter screening, 21 publications formed the dataset. Of the 21 publications, none of them represented Australians living with dementia. The voice of one person living with a terminal illness was included in a study of care partners, and four studies explored the views of community members. The most dominant voices in the dataset were health‐care practitioners, who were represented in 16 studies.ConclusionsAustralian VAD research is a contested space where all stakeholders with a relevant contribution to policy and practice must be represented in contemporary Australian research. As living experience experts with a wealth of experiential knowledge to contribute, the voices of people living with dementia need to be represented in future Australian VAD research through inclusive research design, to ensure a greater balance in stakeholder representation across the VAD literature.","PeriodicalId":55431,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal on Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajag.13371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo critically examine which stakeholders are participating in voluntary assisted dying (VAD) research, to identify the representation of Australians living with dementia.MethodsA scoping review of peer‐reviewed literature to examine which stakeholders are represented in Australian VAD research was conducted. This review was informed by the Arksey and O'Malley Framework for Scoping Reviews, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA‐ScR). Searches were conducted systematically across key academic databases to gather Australian research articles written in English that were published between 2017 and August 2023.ResultsAfter screening, 21 publications formed the dataset. Of the 21 publications, none of them represented Australians living with dementia. The voice of one person living with a terminal illness was included in a study of care partners, and four studies explored the views of community members. The most dominant voices in the dataset were health‐care practitioners, who were represented in 16 studies.ConclusionsAustralian VAD research is a contested space where all stakeholders with a relevant contribution to policy and practice must be represented in contemporary Australian research. As living experience experts with a wealth of experiential knowledge to contribute, the voices of people living with dementia need to be represented in future Australian VAD research through inclusive research design, to ensure a greater balance in stakeholder representation across the VAD literature.
澳大利亚痴呆症患者在自愿协助死亡研究中的代表性:范围界定审查
方法 对同行评议的文献进行了一次范围界定综述,以考察哪些利益相关者参与了澳大利亚的自愿协助死亡(VAD)研究。此次综述参考了Arksey和O'Malley的《范围界定综述框架》以及《范围界定综述首选报告项目》(PRISMA-ScR)。我们在主要学术数据库中进行了系统搜索,以收集 2017 年至 2023 年 8 月间发表的澳大利亚英文研究文章。在这 21 篇出版物中,没有一篇是以澳大利亚痴呆症患者为代表的。在一项关于护理伙伴的研究中,包含了一位身患绝症者的声音,另有四项研究探讨了社区成员的观点。数据集中最主要的声音是医疗保健从业人员的声音,他们在 16 项研究中有所体现。结论澳大利亚的 VAD 研究是一个有争议的领域,所有对政策和实践有相关贡献的利益相关者都必须在当代澳大利亚的研究中有所体现。作为拥有丰富经验知识的生活体验专家,痴呆症患者的声音需要通过包容性的研究设计在未来的澳大利亚老年痴呆症研究中得到体现,以确保老年痴呆症文献中利益相关者代表的更大平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal on Ageing
Australasian Journal on Ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australasian Journal on Ageing is a peer reviewed journal, which publishes original work in any area of gerontology and geriatric medicine. It welcomes international submissions, particularly from authors in the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信