Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study.

IF 4 4区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Hui Lou,Xiaojia Wang,Qiuting Jiang,Xi Li,Yake Yao,Qi Chen,Linxing Chen,Shanshan Zhang,Yunsong Yu,Chao Liu,Hua Zhou
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a highly multiplexed CRISPR-based diagnostic assay for diagnosing lower respiratory tract infection: a prospective cohort study.","authors":"Hui Lou,Xiaojia Wang,Qiuting Jiang,Xi Li,Yake Yao,Qi Chen,Linxing Chen,Shanshan Zhang,Yunsong Yu,Chao Liu,Hua Zhou","doi":"10.1080/23744235.2024.2402921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nAccurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nConsidering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.","PeriodicalId":13671,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases","volume":"18 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2024.2402921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Accurate and rapid identification of causative pathogens is essential to guide the clinical management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Here we conducted a single-centre prospective study in 284 patients suspected of lower respiratory tract infections to evaluate the utility of a nucleic acid test based on highly multiplexed polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and CRISPR-Cas12a. METHODS We determined the analytical and diagnostic performance of the CRISPR assay using a combination of reference standards, including conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS), and clinical adjudication by a panel of experts on infectious diseases and microbiology. RESULTS The CRISPR assay showed a higher detection rate (63.0%) than conventional microbiological tests (38.4%) and was lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (72.9%). In detecting polymicrobial infections, the positivity rate of the CRISPR assay (19.4%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (3.5%) and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (28.9%). The overall diagnostic sensitivity of the CRISPR assay (67.8%) was higher than conventional microbiological tests (41.8%), and lower than metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (93.2%). CONCLUSIONS Considering the low cost, ease of operation, short turnaround time, and broad range of pathogens detected in a single test, the CRISPR assay has the potential to be implemented as a screening tool for the aetiological diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections patients, especially in cases where atypical bacteria or coinfections are suspected.
诊断下呼吸道感染的高度复用 CRISPR 诊断测定的临床评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
目的准确、快速地鉴定致病病原体对于指导下呼吸道感染(LRTI)的临床治疗至关重要。在此,我们对 284 名疑似下呼吸道感染患者进行了一项单中心前瞻性研究,以评估基于高度复用聚合酶链反应(PCR)和 CRISPR-Cas12a 的核酸检验的实用性。结果CRISPR检测的检出率(63.0%)高于传统微生物检测(38.4%),但低于元基因组下一代测序(72.9%)。在检测多微生物感染方面,CRISPR 检测的阳性率(19.4%)高于传统微生物检测(3.5%),低于元基因组下一代测序(28.9%)。CRISPR 检测的总体诊断灵敏度(67.8%)高于传统微生物检测(41.8%),低于元基因组下一代测序(93.2%)。结论考虑到 CRISPR 检测成本低、操作简便、周转时间短、单次检测可检测的病原体范围广,CRISPR 检测有可能被用作下呼吸道感染患者病原学诊断的筛查工具,尤其是在怀疑存在非典型细菌或合并感染的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases
Infectious Diseases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
92
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases (formerly Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles on all aspects of human infection, including pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, and also on medical microbiology and epidemiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信