Efficacy of initial conservative treatment options for temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Yoshihiro Yamaguchi, Kazuhiro Ooi, Hidemichi Yuasa, Akira Nishiyama, Yoshizo Matsuka, Takahiro Abe, Shinpei Matsuda, Yuki Watanabe, Yoshitaka Suzuki, Miki Kashiwagi, Azuma Kosai, Kenichi Sugai, Keika Hoshi, Yasuhiro Ono, Toshihiro Fukazawa, Hidehisa Matsumura, Yuko Fujihara, Hiroyuki Ishiyama
{"title":"Efficacy of initial conservative treatment options for temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Yoshihiro Yamaguchi, Kazuhiro Ooi, Hidemichi Yuasa, Akira Nishiyama, Yoshizo Matsuka, Takahiro Abe, Shinpei Matsuda, Yuki Watanabe, Yoshitaka Suzuki, Miki Kashiwagi, Azuma Kosai, Kenichi Sugai, Keika Hoshi, Yasuhiro Ono, Toshihiro Fukazawa, Hidehisa Matsumura, Yuko Fujihara, Hiroyuki Ishiyama","doi":"10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_23_00273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"</p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to identify effective initial conservative treatment strategies for patients with temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD).</p><p><b>Study selection:</b> RCTs comparing treatment options for TMD published between January 2000 and July 2021 were retrieved from the databases of PubMed and Embase via a comprehensive electronic search. Patients diagnosed with myalgia (muscle pain) or arthralgia (joint pain) according to pain-related Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) were eligible for inclusion. Twelve treatment options and a placebo were included in the mutual comparisons. The risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias 2.0. Forest plots of direct comparisons between individual studies were created using MetaInsight. NMA was performed using R statistical software (netmeta).</p><p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-four RCTs involving 1336 patients assessing pain and 12 RCTs involving 614 patients assessing maximal mouth opening were identified. Low-level laser therapy (standard mean difference [SMD]: -2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.18, -1.06), self-exercise (SMD: -1.51, 95% CI: -2.82, -0.2), and stabilization splints (SMD: -1.16, 95% CI: -2.02, -0.29) were effective in improving pain; however, the certainty of evidence was very low. Self-exercise (SMD: 0.71, 95% CI: -0.58, 2.01), stabilization splints (SMD: 0.65, 95% CI: -0.09, 1.39), and low-level laser therapy (SMD: 0.63, 95% CI: -0.34, 1.6) were effective in improving maximal mouth opening; however, the certainty of evidence was very low.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Stabilization splints, self-exercise, and low-level laser therapy may be effective in the initial treatment of TMD.</p>\n<p></p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_23_00273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to identify effective initial conservative treatment strategies for patients with temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD).

Study selection: RCTs comparing treatment options for TMD published between January 2000 and July 2021 were retrieved from the databases of PubMed and Embase via a comprehensive electronic search. Patients diagnosed with myalgia (muscle pain) or arthralgia (joint pain) according to pain-related Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) and the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) were eligible for inclusion. Twelve treatment options and a placebo were included in the mutual comparisons. The risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias 2.0. Forest plots of direct comparisons between individual studies were created using MetaInsight. NMA was performed using R statistical software (netmeta).

Results: Twenty-four RCTs involving 1336 patients assessing pain and 12 RCTs involving 614 patients assessing maximal mouth opening were identified. Low-level laser therapy (standard mean difference [SMD]: -2.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.18, -1.06), self-exercise (SMD: -1.51, 95% CI: -2.82, -0.2), and stabilization splints (SMD: -1.16, 95% CI: -2.02, -0.29) were effective in improving pain; however, the certainty of evidence was very low. Self-exercise (SMD: 0.71, 95% CI: -0.58, 2.01), stabilization splints (SMD: 0.65, 95% CI: -0.09, 1.39), and low-level laser therapy (SMD: 0.63, 95% CI: -0.34, 1.6) were effective in improving maximal mouth opening; however, the certainty of evidence was very low.

Conclusions: Stabilization splints, self-exercise, and low-level laser therapy may be effective in the initial treatment of TMD.

颞下颌关节紊乱症初期保守治疗方案的疗效:随机临床试验网络荟萃分析
目的:这项随机对照试验(RCT)网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在确定颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)患者有效的初始保守治疗策略:通过全面的电子检索,从 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库中检索了 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月间发表的比较 TMD 治疗方案的 RCT。根据疼痛相关的颞下颌关节紊乱诊断标准(DC/TMD)和颞下颌关节紊乱研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)诊断为肌痛(肌肉痛)或关节痛(关节痛)的患者均符合纳入条件。相互比较中包括 12 种治疗方案和一种安慰剂。偏倚风险采用 Risk of Bias 2.0 进行评估。使用 MetaInsight 绘制了单项研究间直接比较的森林图。使用 R 统计软件(netmeta)进行 NMA:结果:共确定了 24 项研究,涉及 1336 名患者的疼痛评估,以及 12 项研究,涉及 614 名患者的最大张口度评估。低强度激光疗法(标准平均差 [SMD]:-2.12,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-3.18,-1.06)、自我锻炼(SMD:-1.51,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-2.82,-0.2)和稳定夹板(SMD:-1.16,95% 置信区间 [CI]:-2.02,-0.29)可有效改善疼痛;但证据的确定性很低。自我锻炼(SMD:0.71,95% CI:-0.58,2.01)、稳定夹板(SMD:0.65,95% CI:-0.09,1.39)和低水平激光疗法(SMD:0.63,95% CI:-0.34,1.6)对改善最大张口有效,但证据的确定性非常低:结论:稳定夹板、自我锻炼和低强度激光疗法可能对 TMD 的初期治疗有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信