Baseline gut microbiota diversity and composition and albendazole efficacy in hookworm-infected individuals

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 PARASITOLOGY
Javier Gandasegui, Pedro E. Fleitas, Paula Petrone, Berta Grau-Pujol, Valdemiro Novela, Elisa Rubio, Osvaldo Muchisse, Anélsio Cossa, José Carlos Jamine, Charfudin Sacoor, Eric A. T. Brienen, Lisette van Lieshout, José Muñoz, Climent Casals-Pascual
{"title":"Baseline gut microbiota diversity and composition and albendazole efficacy in hookworm-infected individuals","authors":"Javier Gandasegui, Pedro E. Fleitas, Paula Petrone, Berta Grau-Pujol, Valdemiro Novela, Elisa Rubio, Osvaldo Muchisse, Anélsio Cossa, José Carlos Jamine, Charfudin Sacoor, Eric A. T. Brienen, Lisette van Lieshout, José Muñoz, Climent Casals-Pascual","doi":"10.1186/s13071-024-06469-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections account for a significant global health burden, necessitating mass drug administration with benzimidazole-class anthelmintics, such as albendazole (ALB), for morbidity control. However, ALB efficacy shows substantial variability, presenting challenges for achieving consistent treatment outcomes. We have explored the potential impact of the baseline gut microbiota on ALB efficacy in hookworm-infected individuals through microbiota profiling and machine learning (ML) techniques. Our investigation included 89 stool samples collected from hookworm-infected individuals that were analyzed by microscopy and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Of these, 44 were negative by microscopy for STH infection using the Kato-Katz method and qPCR 21 days after treatment, which entails a cure rate of 49.4%. Microbiota characterization was based on amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 16S ribosomal RNA gene region. Alpha and beta diversity analyses revealed no significant differences between participants who were cured and those who were not cured, suggesting that baseline microbiota diversity does not influence ALB treatment outcomes. Furthermore, differential abundance analysis at the phylum, family and genus levels yielded no statistically significant associations between bacterial communities and ALB efficacy. Utilizing supervised ML models failed to predict treatment response accurately. Our investigation did not provide conclusive insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and ALB efficacy. However, the results highlight the need for future research to incorporate longitudinal studies that monitor changes in the gut microbiota related to the infection and the cure with ALB, as well as functional metagenomics to better understand the interaction of the microbiome with the drug, and its role, if there is any, in modulating anthelmintic treatment outcomes in STH infections. Interdisciplinary approaches integrating microbiology, pharmacology, genetics and data science will be pivotal in advancing our understanding of STH infections and optimizing treatment strategies globally. ","PeriodicalId":19793,"journal":{"name":"Parasites & Vectors","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parasites & Vectors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-024-06469-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) infections account for a significant global health burden, necessitating mass drug administration with benzimidazole-class anthelmintics, such as albendazole (ALB), for morbidity control. However, ALB efficacy shows substantial variability, presenting challenges for achieving consistent treatment outcomes. We have explored the potential impact of the baseline gut microbiota on ALB efficacy in hookworm-infected individuals through microbiota profiling and machine learning (ML) techniques. Our investigation included 89 stool samples collected from hookworm-infected individuals that were analyzed by microscopy and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Of these, 44 were negative by microscopy for STH infection using the Kato-Katz method and qPCR 21 days after treatment, which entails a cure rate of 49.4%. Microbiota characterization was based on amplicon sequencing of the V3–V4 16S ribosomal RNA gene region. Alpha and beta diversity analyses revealed no significant differences between participants who were cured and those who were not cured, suggesting that baseline microbiota diversity does not influence ALB treatment outcomes. Furthermore, differential abundance analysis at the phylum, family and genus levels yielded no statistically significant associations between bacterial communities and ALB efficacy. Utilizing supervised ML models failed to predict treatment response accurately. Our investigation did not provide conclusive insights into the relationship between gut microbiota and ALB efficacy. However, the results highlight the need for future research to incorporate longitudinal studies that monitor changes in the gut microbiota related to the infection and the cure with ALB, as well as functional metagenomics to better understand the interaction of the microbiome with the drug, and its role, if there is any, in modulating anthelmintic treatment outcomes in STH infections. Interdisciplinary approaches integrating microbiology, pharmacology, genetics and data science will be pivotal in advancing our understanding of STH infections and optimizing treatment strategies globally.
钩虫感染者的基线肠道微生物群多样性和组成以及阿苯达唑的疗效
土壤传播的蠕虫(STH)感染给全球健康造成了巨大负担,因此有必要大规模使用苯并咪唑类抗虫药,如阿苯咪唑(ALB),以控制发病率。然而,阿苯达唑的疗效存在很大的变异性,给实现一致的治疗效果带来了挑战。我们通过微生物群分析和机器学习(ML)技术探讨了基线肠道微生物群对钩虫感染者的 ALB 疗效的潜在影响。我们的调查包括从钩虫感染者身上采集的 89 份粪便样本,并通过显微镜和定量 PCR (qPCR) 进行了分析。其中,44 份样本在治疗 21 天后通过卡托-卡茨法显微镜检查和 qPCR 检测为阴性,治愈率为 49.4%。微生物群的特征描述基于 V3-V4 16S 核糖体 RNA 基因区的扩增片段测序。阿尔法和贝塔多样性分析表明,治愈者与未治愈者之间没有显著差异,这表明基线微生物群多样性不会影响 ALB 的治疗效果。此外,在门、科和属一级进行的丰度差异分析显示,细菌群落与 ALB 疗效之间没有统计学意义上的关联。利用有监督的 ML 模型无法准确预测治疗反应。我们的调查并未就肠道微生物群与 ALB 药效之间的关系提供结论性见解。不过,研究结果突出表明,未来的研究需要纳入纵向研究,监测与感染和 ALB 治疗相关的肠道微生物群变化,并纳入功能元基因组学研究,以更好地了解微生物群与药物之间的相互作用,以及微生物群在调节 STH 感染中抗虫药治疗效果方面的作用(如果有的话)。整合微生物学、药理学、遗传学和数据科学的跨学科方法将在促进我们对性传播疾病感染的了解和优化全球治疗策略方面发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parasites & Vectors
Parasites & Vectors 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Parasites & Vectors is an open access, peer-reviewed online journal dealing with the biology of parasites, parasitic diseases, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens. Manuscripts published in this journal will be available to all worldwide, with no barriers to access, immediately following acceptance. However, authors retain the copyright of their material and may use it, or distribute it, as they wish. Manuscripts on all aspects of the basic and applied biology of parasites, intermediate hosts, vectors and vector-borne pathogens will be considered. In addition to the traditional and well-established areas of science in these fields, we also aim to provide a vehicle for publication of the rapidly developing resources and technology in parasite, intermediate host and vector genomics and their impacts on biological research. We are able to publish large datasets and extensive results, frequently associated with genomic and post-genomic technologies, which are not readily accommodated in traditional journals. Manuscripts addressing broader issues, for example economics, social sciences and global climate change in relation to parasites, vectors and disease control, are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信