The drama of ideas in the history of quantum gravity: Niels Bohr, Lev Landau, and Matvei Bronstein

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Gennady Gorelik
{"title":"The drama of ideas in the history of quantum gravity: Niels Bohr, Lev Landau, and Matvei Bronstein","authors":"Gennady Gorelik","doi":"10.1140/epjh/s13129-024-00080-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Einstein's expression <i>‘Drama of Ideas’</i> to describe the history of fundamental physics is especially suitable for the problem of quantum gravity (QG). The problem was identified by Einstein in 1916 based on an empirico-cosmological argument that was cosmologically flawed and empirically immeasurable. In 1929, the problem was strikingly underestimated by prominent figures in quantum theory, W. Heisenberg and W. Pauli. In 1929, Bohr, basing on the puzzling results of recent nuclear experiments and theoretical quantum limitations, hypothesized that the law of conservation of energy does not hold in nuclear physics. The young Russian physicist Landau enthusiastically supported Bohr's ‘beautiful idea’ and in 1931 proposed its theoretical justification, which, however, was rejected by Bohr. In late 1932, Landau realized that Bohr's hypothesis was incompatible with Einstein's theory of gravity. This meeting of two fundamental theories prompted Matvei Bronstein to investigate the quantization of gravity in-depth. In 1935, he proposed the first physical theory of QG for the weak gravity and revealed how deep the QG problem was for strong gravity. He showed that the gravitational field at a point in space–time is in principle unobservable and concluded that a complete theory of QG would require the ‘<i>rejection of a Riemannian geometry</i>…<i> and perhaps also the rejection of our ordinary concepts of space and time, replacing them by some much deeper and non-evident concepts’</i>. Until now, despite thousands of publications on QG, the problem remains a great challenge in theoretical physics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/s13129-024-00080-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Einstein's expression ‘Drama of Ideas’ to describe the history of fundamental physics is especially suitable for the problem of quantum gravity (QG). The problem was identified by Einstein in 1916 based on an empirico-cosmological argument that was cosmologically flawed and empirically immeasurable. In 1929, the problem was strikingly underestimated by prominent figures in quantum theory, W. Heisenberg and W. Pauli. In 1929, Bohr, basing on the puzzling results of recent nuclear experiments and theoretical quantum limitations, hypothesized that the law of conservation of energy does not hold in nuclear physics. The young Russian physicist Landau enthusiastically supported Bohr's ‘beautiful idea’ and in 1931 proposed its theoretical justification, which, however, was rejected by Bohr. In late 1932, Landau realized that Bohr's hypothesis was incompatible with Einstein's theory of gravity. This meeting of two fundamental theories prompted Matvei Bronstein to investigate the quantization of gravity in-depth. In 1935, he proposed the first physical theory of QG for the weak gravity and revealed how deep the QG problem was for strong gravity. He showed that the gravitational field at a point in space–time is in principle unobservable and concluded that a complete theory of QG would require the ‘rejection of a Riemannian geometry and perhaps also the rejection of our ordinary concepts of space and time, replacing them by some much deeper and non-evident concepts’. Until now, despite thousands of publications on QG, the problem remains a great challenge in theoretical physics.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

量子引力史上的思想戏剧:尼尔斯-玻尔、列夫-朗道和马特维-布朗斯坦
爱因斯坦用 "思想的戏剧 "来形容基础物理学的历史,尤其适用于量子引力(QG)问题。爱因斯坦于 1916 年根据经验宇宙学的论证发现了这一问题,但这一论证在宇宙学上是有缺陷的,在经验上也是不可测量的。1929 年,量子理论界的著名人物海森堡(W. Heisenberg)和保利(W. Pauli)低估了这一问题。1929 年,玻尔根据最近核实验的令人费解的结果和量子理论的局限性,提出了能量守恒定律在核物理中不成立的假设。年轻的俄罗斯物理学家朗道热情支持玻尔的 "美丽想法",并于 1931 年提出了理论依据,但遭到玻尔的拒绝。1932 年底,朗道意识到玻尔的假说与爱因斯坦的万有引力理论不相容。两种基本理论的相遇促使马特维-布朗斯坦深入研究万有引力的量子化问题。1935 年,他首次提出了弱引力的量子化物理理论,并揭示了强引力的量子化问题有多么深刻。他指出,时空中某一点的引力场原则上是不可观测的,并得出结论说,一个完整的量子化引力理论需要 "摒弃黎曼几何......也许还需要摒弃我们普通的空间和时间概念,代之以一些更深奥和非显而易见的概念"。直到现在,尽管关于 QG 的出版物数以千计,这个问题仍然是理论物理学中的一个巨大挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The European Physical Journal H
The European Physical Journal H HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works. The scope explicitly includes: - Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics. - Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts. - Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信