The feasibility of a Swiss complex interprofessional intervention to improve the management of procedural pain in neonates in the Finnish context: A qualitative study

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Mariaana Mäki‐Asiala, Colette Balice‐Bourgois, Anna Axelin, Tarja Pölkki
{"title":"The feasibility of a Swiss complex interprofessional intervention to improve the management of procedural pain in neonates in the Finnish context: A qualitative study","authors":"Mariaana Mäki‐Asiala, Colette Balice‐Bourgois, Anna Axelin, Tarja Pölkki","doi":"10.1111/scs.13298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo evaluate the feasibility of the Swiss complex interprofessional intervention, NEODOL© (NEOnato DOLore), for improving the management of procedural pain in neonates in the Finnish context.BackgroundInterprofessional collaboration is important for all professionals involved in the care of neonates and for neonates' parents, to understand the appropriate use of non‐pharmacological and/or pharmacological methods for each pain situation and how to assess pain in real‐life situations. Appropriate methods of pain relief for neonates should be preferred as they protect the development of the neonate's brain.DesignA descriptive qualitative design.MethodData were collected through semi‐structured focus group discussions following the Medical Research Council's framework for evaluation of complex interventions, in this case NEODOL© which aims to improve the procedural pain management of neonates. A purposive sample (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 13) included eleven professionals representing various professions within Finnish Neonatal Intensive Care Units and two parents of infants who have received care in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis, and the results were reported in accordance with the COREQ guidelines.ResultsProfessionals' and parents' evaluations suggest that NEODOL© is feasible, because it is consistent and addresses a current need. They assessed its overall content to be relevant and accessible, and its components to be internally coherent. However, they emphasise the need for further evaluation and refinement of the intervention to achieve the desired outcomes and cost‐effectiveness.ConclusionsWhile NEODOL© is considered feasible, it requires further evaluation and refinement in the local context of each hospital before implementation.","PeriodicalId":48171,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.13298","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimTo evaluate the feasibility of the Swiss complex interprofessional intervention, NEODOL© (NEOnato DOLore), for improving the management of procedural pain in neonates in the Finnish context.BackgroundInterprofessional collaboration is important for all professionals involved in the care of neonates and for neonates' parents, to understand the appropriate use of non‐pharmacological and/or pharmacological methods for each pain situation and how to assess pain in real‐life situations. Appropriate methods of pain relief for neonates should be preferred as they protect the development of the neonate's brain.DesignA descriptive qualitative design.MethodData were collected through semi‐structured focus group discussions following the Medical Research Council's framework for evaluation of complex interventions, in this case NEODOL© which aims to improve the procedural pain management of neonates. A purposive sample (n = 13) included eleven professionals representing various professions within Finnish Neonatal Intensive Care Units and two parents of infants who have received care in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis, and the results were reported in accordance with the COREQ guidelines.ResultsProfessionals' and parents' evaluations suggest that NEODOL© is feasible, because it is consistent and addresses a current need. They assessed its overall content to be relevant and accessible, and its components to be internally coherent. However, they emphasise the need for further evaluation and refinement of the intervention to achieve the desired outcomes and cost‐effectiveness.ConclusionsWhile NEODOL© is considered feasible, it requires further evaluation and refinement in the local context of each hospital before implementation.
在芬兰开展的一项旨在改善新生儿手术疼痛管理的瑞士复杂跨专业干预措施的可行性研究:定性研究
背景跨专业合作对于所有参与新生儿护理的专业人员和新生儿父母来说都非常重要,他们需要了解针对每种疼痛情况适当使用非药物和/或药物方法,以及如何在现实生活中评估疼痛。设计采用描述性定性设计。方法按照医学研究委员会的复杂干预评估框架,通过半结构化焦点小组讨论收集数据,在本例中,NEODOL© 的目的是改善新生儿手术疼痛管理。有目的性的样本(n = 13)包括代表芬兰新生儿重症监护病房不同专业的 11 名专业人员和两名曾在新生儿重症监护病房接受护理的婴儿家长。结果专业人员和家长的评价表明,NEODOL© 是可行的,因为它具有连贯性并能满足当前的需求。他们认为,该教材的总体内容具有针对性,易于理解,各组成部分之间具有内在一致性。结论 虽然 NEODOL© 被认为是可行的,但在实施之前还需要根据各医院的具体情况进行进一步的评估和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences is an established quarterly, peer reviewed Journal with an outstanding international reputation. As the official publication of the Nordic College of Caring Science, the Journal shares their mission to contribute to the development and advancement of scientific knowledge on caring related to health, well-being, illness and the alleviation of human suffering. The emphasis is on research that has a patient, family and community focus and which promotes an interdisciplinary team approach. Of special interest are scholarly articles addressing and initiating dialogue on theoretical, empirical and methodological concerns related to critical issues. All articles are expected to demonstrate respect for human dignity and accountability to society. In addition to original research the Journal also publishes reviews, meta-syntheses and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信