Venous Thromboembolism Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis in Burn Patients: a National Trauma Database Study

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Eloise W Stanton, Artur Manasyan, Callie M Thompson, Gourang P Patel, Alexandra M Lacey, Taryn E Travis, Sebastian Q Vrouwe, Clifford C Sheckter, Justin Gillenwater
{"title":"Venous Thromboembolism Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis in Burn Patients: a National Trauma Database Study","authors":"Eloise W Stanton, Artur Manasyan, Callie M Thompson, Gourang P Patel, Alexandra M Lacey, Taryn E Travis, Sebastian Q Vrouwe, Clifford C Sheckter, Justin Gillenwater","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/irae171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Comprehensive studies on the incidence, risk factors, and prophylactic measures related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) are lacking in burn care. This study characterizes VTE risk and existing prevention measures to improve and inform overall patient care in the field of burn care on a national scale. The US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried from 2007 to 2021 to identify burn-injured patients. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and VTE risk as well as compare various VTE chemoprophylaxis types. There were 326,614 burn-injured patients included for analysis; 5,642 (1.7%) experienced a VTE event during their hospitalization. Patients with VTE were significantly older, had greater BMIs and %TBSA, and were more likely to be male (p<0.001). History of smoking, hypertension or myocardial infarction, and/or substance use disorder were significant predictors of VTE (p<0.001). Patients who received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were less likely to have VTE compared to patients treated with heparin when controlling for other VTE risk factors (OR: .564 95% CI .523-.607, p<0.001). Longer time to VTE chemoprophylaxis (>6 hours) initiation was significantly associated with VTE (OR=1.04 95% CI 1.03=1.07, p<0.001). This study sheds light on risk factors and chemoprophylaxis in VTE to help guide clinical practice when implementing prevention strategies in burn patients. This knowledge can be leveraged to refine risk stratification models, inform evidence-based prevention strategies, and ultimately enhance the quality of care for burn patients at risk of VTE.","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/irae171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comprehensive studies on the incidence, risk factors, and prophylactic measures related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) are lacking in burn care. This study characterizes VTE risk and existing prevention measures to improve and inform overall patient care in the field of burn care on a national scale. The US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried from 2007 to 2021 to identify burn-injured patients. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and VTE risk as well as compare various VTE chemoprophylaxis types. There were 326,614 burn-injured patients included for analysis; 5,642 (1.7%) experienced a VTE event during their hospitalization. Patients with VTE were significantly older, had greater BMIs and %TBSA, and were more likely to be male (p<0.001). History of smoking, hypertension or myocardial infarction, and/or substance use disorder were significant predictors of VTE (p<0.001). Patients who received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were less likely to have VTE compared to patients treated with heparin when controlling for other VTE risk factors (OR: .564 95% CI .523-.607, p<0.001). Longer time to VTE chemoprophylaxis (>6 hours) initiation was significantly associated with VTE (OR=1.04 95% CI 1.03=1.07, p<0.001). This study sheds light on risk factors and chemoprophylaxis in VTE to help guide clinical practice when implementing prevention strategies in burn patients. This knowledge can be leveraged to refine risk stratification models, inform evidence-based prevention strategies, and ultimately enhance the quality of care for burn patients at risk of VTE.
烧伤患者的静脉血栓栓塞症发病率、风险因素和预防措施:国家创伤数据库研究
烧伤护理领域缺乏对静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发病率、风险因素和预防措施的全面研究。本研究描述了 VTE 风险和现有预防措施的特征,以在全国范围内改善烧伤护理领域的整体患者护理并提供相关信息。研究人员查询了 2007 年至 2021 年的美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB),以确定烧伤患者。研究人员使用描述性统计和多变量回归分析来探讨人口统计学/临床特征与 VTE 风险之间的关系,并比较各种 VTE 化学预防类型。纳入分析的烧伤患者有 326,614 人,其中 5,642 人(1.7%)在住院期间发生了 VTE 事件。VTE患者的年龄明显偏大,体重指数(BMI)和TBSA百分比更高,男性的可能性更大(p<0.001)。吸烟史、高血压或心肌梗塞和/或药物使用障碍是VTE的重要预测因素(p<0.001)。在控制其他 VTE 风险因素的情况下,与接受肝素治疗的患者相比,接受低分子量肝素 (LMWH) 治疗的患者发生 VTE 的几率更低(OR:.564 95% CI .523-.607,p<0.001)。VTE化学预防开始时间较长(>6小时)与VTE显著相关(OR=1.04 95% CI 1.03=1.07,p<0.001)。这项研究揭示了 VTE 的风险因素和化学预防,有助于指导烧伤患者实施预防策略时的临床实践。可以利用这些知识完善风险分层模型,为循证预防策略提供依据,最终提高对有 VTE 风险的烧伤患者的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信