Quantifying the effects of carborundum rock surface smoothing for Schmidt hammer R-value metrics measured on glacial erratics in the North American Great Lakes region

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Brianna Shepherd, Eric W. Portenga, Alexys J. Peplinski
{"title":"Quantifying the effects of carborundum rock surface smoothing for Schmidt hammer R-value metrics measured on glacial erratics in the North American Great Lakes region","authors":"Brianna Shepherd,&nbsp;Eric W. Portenga,&nbsp;Alexys J. Peplinski","doi":"10.1002/esp.5973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Schmidt hammer R-values, which reflect the degree of rock surface weathering, can be paired with independent rock surface exposure ages to produce Schmidt hammer exposure-age dating (SHD) calibration curves that are used to provide rapid estimations of exposure ages for undated rock surfaces. In this Letter, we lay the groundwork for later establishing a SHD calibration curve based on glacial erratics deposited by the Laurentide Ice Sheet in the North American Great Lakes region. First, we establish a reference R-value for a calibration boulder, which may be used to facilitate direct comparison of R-values collected by different individuals using mechanical N-type Schmidt hammers, specifically. We then assess how no, light or heavy use of a carborundum puck to smooth rock surfaces affects resulting R-value data. Lastly, we compare two different R-value metrics on the same rock surface: R<sub>mean</sub> (<i>n</i> = 30) versus ΔR (R<sub>max</sub> − R<sub>min</sub> of five consecutive R-values on the same spot). In all assessments, R<sub>mean</sub> is similar for erratic surfaces with no and light surface treatment, and both are significantly lower than R<sub>mean</sub> of surfaces with heavy treatment. Thus, we advise against the use of heavy surface treatment in SHD applications. We observe no relationship between inferred erratic age and either R<sub>mean</sub> or ΔR, which could arise from inferred ages of erratics being inaccurate, from inferred ages of erratics being too similar or from measuring too few erratics from each landform.</p>","PeriodicalId":11408,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","volume":"49 13","pages":"4077-4087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Processes and Landforms","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/esp.5973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schmidt hammer R-values, which reflect the degree of rock surface weathering, can be paired with independent rock surface exposure ages to produce Schmidt hammer exposure-age dating (SHD) calibration curves that are used to provide rapid estimations of exposure ages for undated rock surfaces. In this Letter, we lay the groundwork for later establishing a SHD calibration curve based on glacial erratics deposited by the Laurentide Ice Sheet in the North American Great Lakes region. First, we establish a reference R-value for a calibration boulder, which may be used to facilitate direct comparison of R-values collected by different individuals using mechanical N-type Schmidt hammers, specifically. We then assess how no, light or heavy use of a carborundum puck to smooth rock surfaces affects resulting R-value data. Lastly, we compare two different R-value metrics on the same rock surface: Rmean (n = 30) versus ΔR (Rmax − Rmin of five consecutive R-values on the same spot). In all assessments, Rmean is similar for erratic surfaces with no and light surface treatment, and both are significantly lower than Rmean of surfaces with heavy treatment. Thus, we advise against the use of heavy surface treatment in SHD applications. We observe no relationship between inferred erratic age and either Rmean or ΔR, which could arise from inferred ages of erratics being inaccurate, from inferred ages of erratics being too similar or from measuring too few erratics from each landform.

量化碳化硅岩石表面平滑对在北美五大湖区冰川岩屑上测量的施密特锤R值指标的影响
反映岩石表面风化程度的施密特锤 R 值可与独立的岩石表面暴露年龄配对,生成施密特锤暴露年龄定年(SHD)校准曲线,用于快速估算未定年岩石表面的暴露年龄。在这封信中,我们为以后根据北美五大湖区劳伦泰德冰盖沉积的冰川岩屑建立 Schmidt hammer 暴露年代校准曲线奠定了基础。首先,我们为校准巨石建立了一个参考 R 值,该值可用于直接比较不同个人使用 N 型施密特机械锤收集的 R 值。然后,我们评估了不使用、轻度使用或重度使用碳化硅球来平滑岩石表面对所得 R 值数据的影响。最后,我们对同一岩石表面的两种不同 R 值指标进行了比较:Rmean(n = 30)与 ΔR(同一地点五个连续 R 值的 Rmax - Rmin)。在所有评估中,未进行表面处理和轻度表面处理的不稳定表面的 Rmean 值相似,都明显低于重度表面处理的 Rmean 值。因此,我们建议在 SHD 应用中不要使用重度表面处理。我们观察到,推断的飘忽不定的年龄与 Rmean 或 ΔR 之间没有关系,这可能是由于推断的飘忽不定的年龄不准确、推断的飘忽不定的年龄过于相似或测量的每种地貌的飘忽不定的数量太少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.10%
发文量
215
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Processes and Landforms is an interdisciplinary international journal concerned with: the interactions between surface processes and landforms and landscapes; that lead to physical, chemical and biological changes; and which in turn create; current landscapes and the geological record of past landscapes. Its focus is core to both physical geographical and geological communities, and also the wider geosciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信