Novelty Seeking Differences in Temporal Dynamics for Novelty and Appropriateness Processing of Creative Information: An ERP Investigation

IF 2.8 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Creative Behavior Pub Date : 2024-09-08 DOI:10.1002/jocb.1504

Yuanjing Lyu, Shuoqi Xiang, Zexuan Jiang, Huizhi Bai, Junjie Huang, Weixing Yang, Xing Wang, Senqing Qi, Weiping Hu

{"title":"Novelty Seeking Differences in Temporal Dynamics for Novelty and Appropriateness Processing of Creative Information: An ERP Investigation","authors":"Yuanjing Lyu, Shuoqi Xiang, Zexuan Jiang, Huizhi Bai, Junjie Huang, Weixing Yang, Xing Wang, Senqing Qi, Weiping Hu","doi":"10.1002/jocb.1504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Novelty seeking has been found to affect creative performance, but its impact on the temporal dynamics of creative information processing remains unclear. Creative information is identified by two key indicators—novelty and appropriateness. To explore the effect of novelty seeking on the temporal processing of novelty and appropriateness, a revised alternative uses task (AUT) was conducted with 29 high novelty‐seeking (HNS) and 31 low novelty‐seeking (LNS) individuals. Event‐related potentials (ERPs) and spontaneous blink rate (EBR) were used to measure temporal dynamics and infer physiological mechanisms. (1) For novelty processing, HNS individuals performed quicker information processing (shorter N1/P2 latency) and had a greater capacity to recognize semantic distance (higher P600 peak amplitude). (2) For appropriate processing, HNS individuals also had a faster information processing rate (shorter N1/P2 latency). (3) HNS individuals had higher baseline EBR and showed enhancements in cognitive speed based on real‐time EBR. In contrast, the LNS group did not show the same improvement even with increased attention allocation. These findings expand the application of the Novelty Seeking Model (NGM) in creative information processing. Additionally, the results of EBR suggest that dopamine might be the critical physiological mechanism through which novelty‐seeking influences creative information processing.","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.1504","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Novelty seeking has been found to affect creative performance, but its impact on the temporal dynamics of creative information processing remains unclear. Creative information is identified by two key indicators—novelty and appropriateness. To explore the effect of novelty seeking on the temporal processing of novelty and appropriateness, a revised alternative uses task (AUT) was conducted with 29 high novelty‐seeking (HNS) and 31 low novelty‐seeking (LNS) individuals. Event‐related potentials (ERPs) and spontaneous blink rate (EBR) were used to measure temporal dynamics and infer physiological mechanisms. (1) For novelty processing, HNS individuals performed quicker information processing (shorter N1/P2 latency) and had a greater capacity to recognize semantic distance (higher P600 peak amplitude). (2) For appropriate processing, HNS individuals also had a faster information processing rate (shorter N1/P2 latency). (3) HNS individuals had higher baseline EBR and showed enhancements in cognitive speed based on real‐time EBR. In contrast, the LNS group did not show the same improvement even with increased attention allocation. These findings expand the application of the Novelty Seeking Model (NGM) in creative information processing. Additionally, the results of EBR suggest that dopamine might be the critical physiological mechanism through which novelty‐seeking influences creative information processing.

查看原文本刊更多论文

创意信息的新颖性和适当性处理的时间动态差异：ERP调查

研究发现，寻求新颖性会影响创造性的表现，但它对创造性信息处理的时间动态的影响仍不清楚。创意信息由两个关键指标--新颖性和适当性--来识别。为了探索寻求新奇对新奇性和适当性的时间处理的影响，我们对 29 名寻求新奇程度高（HNS）和 31 名寻求新奇程度低（LNS）的人进行了修订的替代使用任务（AUT）。采用事件相关电位（ERP）和自发眨眼率（EBR）测量时间动态并推断生理机制。(1) 在新奇感处理方面，HNS个体的信息处理速度更快（N1/P2潜伏期更短），识别语义距离的能力更强（P600峰值振幅更高）。(2) 在适当加工方面，HNS 人的信息加工速度也更快（N1/P2 潜伏期更短）。(3) HNS 患儿的基线 EBR 较高，并根据实时 EBR 显示出认知速度的提高。相比之下，LNS 组即使增加了注意力分配，也没有显示出同样的改善。这些发现拓展了新奇寻求模型（NGM）在创造性信息处理中的应用。此外，EBR 的结果表明，多巴胺可能是新奇寻求影响创造性信息处理的关键生理机制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

7.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.