A temporal evolution of human resource management and technology research: a retrospective bibliometric analysis

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Srumita Narzary, Upam Pushpak Makhecha, Pawan Budhwar, Ashish Malik, Satish Kumar
{"title":"A temporal evolution of human resource management and technology research: a retrospective bibliometric analysis","authors":"Srumita Narzary, Upam Pushpak Makhecha, Pawan Budhwar, Ashish Malik, Satish Kumar","doi":"10.1108/pr-04-2023-0296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Research on human resource management (HRM) and technology has gained momentum recently. This review aims to create a bibliographic profile of the field of HRM and technology using bibliometric techniques, complemented by qualitative analysis, examining 239 articles published in the four key human resource (HR) journals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>First, using VOSviewer software, we analysed the research productivity by identifying authors, journals and influential articles, followed by insights on research themes and their evolution. Next, integrating bibliometric and qualitative approaches, we conducted a hybrid inquiry of the field to analyse current theories, methods and variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The bibliometric analysis highlighted the intellectual structure, key themes and distinctive developments categorised under four temporal phases that have shaped research in this field. In addition, qualitative analysis presents significant theoretical perspectives, the methods employed and the nomological framework of variables.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Our study advances the extant literature on HRM and technology by quantifying the leading bibliometric performance indicators complemented by qualitative evaluation of the field, which entails exploring the possible research strands and related trends that have emerged in the past two decades.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-04-2023-0296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Research on human resource management (HRM) and technology has gained momentum recently. This review aims to create a bibliographic profile of the field of HRM and technology using bibliometric techniques, complemented by qualitative analysis, examining 239 articles published in the four key human resource (HR) journals.

Design/methodology/approach

First, using VOSviewer software, we analysed the research productivity by identifying authors, journals and influential articles, followed by insights on research themes and their evolution. Next, integrating bibliometric and qualitative approaches, we conducted a hybrid inquiry of the field to analyse current theories, methods and variables.

Findings

The bibliometric analysis highlighted the intellectual structure, key themes and distinctive developments categorised under four temporal phases that have shaped research in this field. In addition, qualitative analysis presents significant theoretical perspectives, the methods employed and the nomological framework of variables.

Originality/value

Our study advances the extant literature on HRM and technology by quantifying the leading bibliometric performance indicators complemented by qualitative evaluation of the field, which entails exploring the possible research strands and related trends that have emerged in the past two decades.

人力资源管理和技术研究的时间演变:文献计量学回顾分析
目的有关人力资源管理(HRM)和技术的研究近来势头强劲。本综述旨在利用文献计量学技术,辅以定性分析,对人力资源管理与技术领域的 239 篇文章进行研究。首先,我们使用 VOSviewer 软件,通过识别作者、期刊和有影响力的文章来分析研究成果,然后深入了解研究主题及其演变。接下来,我们结合文献计量学和定性方法,对该领域进行了混合调查,以分析当前的理论、方法和变量。研究结果文献计量学分析强调了知识结构、关键主题和独特的发展,并将其归类为塑造该领域研究的四个时间阶段。此外,定性分析介绍了重要的理论观点、采用的方法和变量的命名框架。原创性/价值我们的研究通过量化主要的文献计量性能指标,并辅以对该领域的定性评估,探索了过去二十年中可能出现的研究领域和相关趋势,从而推动了现有的人力资源管理与技术文献的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信