Application and comparison of RBF and BP neural networks for lithology identification of Permian volcanic rocks in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin in China
Shuo Shi, Wenlong Ding, Zhan Zhao, Ruiqiang Yang, Teng Zhao, Jinhua Liu, Tan Zhang
{"title":"Application and comparison of RBF and BP neural networks for lithology identification of Permian volcanic rocks in the Shunbei area of the Tarim Basin in China","authors":"Shuo Shi, Wenlong Ding, Zhan Zhao, Ruiqiang Yang, Teng Zhao, Jinhua Liu, Tan Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s12040-024-02352-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to the complexity of the sedimentary environment and the heterogeneities and similarities between logging data, lithology identification is difficult. Taking the Permian in Shunbei area of Tarim Basin as an example, based on a complete understanding of the target reservoir characteristics, used the crossplot method, BP (backpropagation) neural network method and RBF (radial basis function) neural network method to identify three types of volcanic rocks: tuff, andesite, and basalt. At the same time, the crossplot method was used to select four logging curves that are sensitive to lithofacies changes as important indicators for identifying volcanic rocks, such as the natural gamma ray (GR), compensated density (DEN), compensated neutron (CNL) and spontaneous potential (SP) logs. Then, the sensitive curves were preprocessed by standardization, and suitable learning samples were selected. Two types of neural network prediction models were established, and the mapping relationship between the lithology and logging curves was used to identify the lithofacies of the key wells in the study area. Finally, by comparing the recognition results of the three methods, it was found that the RBF network not only achieved higher accuracy in the prediction results but also had fewer learning iterations than the BP network could more accurately identify volcanic rocks, and has certain popularization and application values, while the crossplot method had the worst recognition results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Earth System Science","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Earth System Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02352-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to the complexity of the sedimentary environment and the heterogeneities and similarities between logging data, lithology identification is difficult. Taking the Permian in Shunbei area of Tarim Basin as an example, based on a complete understanding of the target reservoir characteristics, used the crossplot method, BP (backpropagation) neural network method and RBF (radial basis function) neural network method to identify three types of volcanic rocks: tuff, andesite, and basalt. At the same time, the crossplot method was used to select four logging curves that are sensitive to lithofacies changes as important indicators for identifying volcanic rocks, such as the natural gamma ray (GR), compensated density (DEN), compensated neutron (CNL) and spontaneous potential (SP) logs. Then, the sensitive curves were preprocessed by standardization, and suitable learning samples were selected. Two types of neural network prediction models were established, and the mapping relationship between the lithology and logging curves was used to identify the lithofacies of the key wells in the study area. Finally, by comparing the recognition results of the three methods, it was found that the RBF network not only achieved higher accuracy in the prediction results but also had fewer learning iterations than the BP network could more accurately identify volcanic rocks, and has certain popularization and application values, while the crossplot method had the worst recognition results.
由于沉积环境的复杂性和测井资料之间的异质性和相似性,岩性识别十分困难。以塔里木盆地顺北地区二叠系为例,在全面了解目标储层特征的基础上,利用交叉图法、BP(反向传播)神经网络法和 RBF(径向基函数)神经网络法识别了凝灰岩、安山岩和玄武岩三种类型的火山岩。同时,利用交叉图法选择了四条对岩性变化敏感的测井曲线作为识别火山岩的重要指标,如天然伽马射线测井曲线(GR)、补偿密度测井曲线(DEN)、补偿中子测井曲线(CNL)和自发电位测井曲线(SP)。然后,对敏感曲线进行标准化预处理,并选择合适的学习样本。建立了两种神经网络预测模型,并利用岩性与测井曲线之间的映射关系识别了研究区重点井的岩性。最后,通过比较三种方法的识别结果发现,RBF 网络不仅预测结果的准确率较高,而且学习迭代次数比 BP 网络少,能更准确地识别火山岩,具有一定的推广应用价值,而交叉图法的识别结果最差。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Earth System Science, an International Journal, was earlier a part of the Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences – Section A begun in 1934, and later split in 1978 into theme journals. This journal was published as Proceedings – Earth and Planetary Sciences since 1978, and in 2005 was renamed ‘Journal of Earth System Science’.
The journal is highly inter-disciplinary and publishes scholarly research – new data, ideas, and conceptual advances – in Earth System Science. The focus is on the evolution of the Earth as a system: manuscripts describing changes of anthropogenic origin in a limited region are not considered unless they go beyond describing the changes to include an analysis of earth-system processes. The journal''s scope includes the solid earth (geosphere), the atmosphere, the hydrosphere (including cryosphere), and the biosphere; it also addresses related aspects of planetary and space sciences. Contributions pertaining to the Indian sub- continent and the surrounding Indian-Ocean region are particularly welcome. Given that a large number of manuscripts report either observations or model results for a limited domain, manuscripts intended for publication in JESS are expected to fulfill at least one of the following three criteria.
The data should be of relevance and should be of statistically significant size and from a region from where such data are sparse. If the data are from a well-sampled region, the data size should be considerable and advance our knowledge of the region.
A model study is carried out to explain observations reported either in the same manuscript or in the literature.
The analysis, whether of data or with models, is novel and the inferences advance the current knowledge.