Ramandeep Kumar Sharma, Jagmandeep Dhillon, Pushp Kumar, K Raja Reddy, Vaughn Reed, Darrin M. Dodds, Krishna N. Reddy
{"title":"Modelling the climate change and cotton yield relationship in Mississippi: Autoregressive distributed lag approach","authors":"Ramandeep Kumar Sharma, Jagmandeep Dhillon, Pushp Kumar, K Raja Reddy, Vaughn Reed, Darrin M. Dodds, Krishna N. Reddy","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development of mitigation strategies to combat climate change necessitates an advanced analysis of the historical connection between crops and climate. Such an analysis is lacking for the cotton ( L.)-climate research in Mississippi (MS). Hitherto, research has been confined to small-scale experimental settings, leaving an opportunity to explore large-scale inferences. Therefore, the present study aimed to compute MS climatic trends during the cotton growing period (CGP) from 1970 to 2020 using the Mann-Kendall and Sen slope methods. The impact of climate change on MS cotton yield was assessed using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. The climatic variables considered were maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), precipitation (PR), and CO emissions (COE). A required series of statistical tests, including pre- and post-analysis, model robustness, and goodness-of-fit were performed, and data met all criteria. Results revealed that Tmin (79.6 %) contributed more than Tmax (20.4 %) to the MS-climate warming over CGP. From 1970 to 2020, the Tmax, Tmin, DTR, and PR changed by + 0.30 °C, +1.17 °C, −1.07 °C, and + 22.54 mm, respectively, exhibiting change rate per decade of + 0.06 °C, +0.23 °C, −0.21 °C, and + 4.42 mm, respectively. Precipitation had no effect on cotton yield in the long or short-term. However, cotton yield significantly decreased with a rise in Tmax, and increased with a rise in Tmin and COE in the long-term. Conclusively, a 1 °C increase in Tmax reduced cotton yield by 6.1 %, a 1 °C increase in Tmin improved it by 5.5 %, and a unit increase in COE increased it by 0.45 % over the long run. Overall, the crop-climate link in MS cotton marked a varied sensitivity towards short and long-term, indicating the need to reassess current mitigation strategies. Additionally, testing the best agronomic practices in a controlled environment at the actual rates of climate change identified by the current study could provide cotton stakeholders with more precise and valuable insights.","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Development of mitigation strategies to combat climate change necessitates an advanced analysis of the historical connection between crops and climate. Such an analysis is lacking for the cotton ( L.)-climate research in Mississippi (MS). Hitherto, research has been confined to small-scale experimental settings, leaving an opportunity to explore large-scale inferences. Therefore, the present study aimed to compute MS climatic trends during the cotton growing period (CGP) from 1970 to 2020 using the Mann-Kendall and Sen slope methods. The impact of climate change on MS cotton yield was assessed using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. The climatic variables considered were maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), precipitation (PR), and CO emissions (COE). A required series of statistical tests, including pre- and post-analysis, model robustness, and goodness-of-fit were performed, and data met all criteria. Results revealed that Tmin (79.6 %) contributed more than Tmax (20.4 %) to the MS-climate warming over CGP. From 1970 to 2020, the Tmax, Tmin, DTR, and PR changed by + 0.30 °C, +1.17 °C, −1.07 °C, and + 22.54 mm, respectively, exhibiting change rate per decade of + 0.06 °C, +0.23 °C, −0.21 °C, and + 4.42 mm, respectively. Precipitation had no effect on cotton yield in the long or short-term. However, cotton yield significantly decreased with a rise in Tmax, and increased with a rise in Tmin and COE in the long-term. Conclusively, a 1 °C increase in Tmax reduced cotton yield by 6.1 %, a 1 °C increase in Tmin improved it by 5.5 %, and a unit increase in COE increased it by 0.45 % over the long run. Overall, the crop-climate link in MS cotton marked a varied sensitivity towards short and long-term, indicating the need to reassess current mitigation strategies. Additionally, testing the best agronomic practices in a controlled environment at the actual rates of climate change identified by the current study could provide cotton stakeholders with more precise and valuable insights.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.