Modelling the climate change and cotton yield relationship in Mississippi: Autoregressive distributed lag approach

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Ramandeep Kumar Sharma, Jagmandeep Dhillon, Pushp Kumar, K Raja Reddy, Vaughn Reed, Darrin M. Dodds, Krishna N. Reddy
{"title":"Modelling the climate change and cotton yield relationship in Mississippi: Autoregressive distributed lag approach","authors":"Ramandeep Kumar Sharma, Jagmandeep Dhillon, Pushp Kumar, K Raja Reddy, Vaughn Reed, Darrin M. Dodds, Krishna N. Reddy","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development of mitigation strategies to combat climate change necessitates an advanced analysis of the historical connection between crops and climate. Such an analysis is lacking for the cotton ( L.)-climate research in Mississippi (MS). Hitherto, research has been confined to small-scale experimental settings, leaving an opportunity to explore large-scale inferences. Therefore, the present study aimed to compute MS climatic trends during the cotton growing period (CGP) from 1970 to 2020 using the Mann-Kendall and Sen slope methods. The impact of climate change on MS cotton yield was assessed using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. The climatic variables considered were maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), precipitation (PR), and CO emissions (COE). A required series of statistical tests, including pre- and post-analysis, model robustness, and goodness-of-fit were performed, and data met all criteria. Results revealed that Tmin (79.6 %) contributed more than Tmax (20.4 %) to the MS-climate warming over CGP. From 1970 to 2020, the Tmax, Tmin, DTR, and PR changed by + 0.30 °C, +1.17 °C, −1.07 °C, and + 22.54 mm, respectively, exhibiting change rate per decade of + 0.06 °C, +0.23 °C, −0.21 °C, and + 4.42 mm, respectively. Precipitation had no effect on cotton yield in the long or short-term. However, cotton yield significantly decreased with a rise in Tmax, and increased with a rise in Tmin and COE in the long-term. Conclusively, a 1 °C increase in Tmax reduced cotton yield by 6.1 %, a 1 °C increase in Tmin improved it by 5.5 %, and a unit increase in COE increased it by 0.45 % over the long run. Overall, the crop-climate link in MS cotton marked a varied sensitivity towards short and long-term, indicating the need to reassess current mitigation strategies. Additionally, testing the best agronomic practices in a controlled environment at the actual rates of climate change identified by the current study could provide cotton stakeholders with more precise and valuable insights.","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112573","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Development of mitigation strategies to combat climate change necessitates an advanced analysis of the historical connection between crops and climate. Such an analysis is lacking for the cotton ( L.)-climate research in Mississippi (MS). Hitherto, research has been confined to small-scale experimental settings, leaving an opportunity to explore large-scale inferences. Therefore, the present study aimed to compute MS climatic trends during the cotton growing period (CGP) from 1970 to 2020 using the Mann-Kendall and Sen slope methods. The impact of climate change on MS cotton yield was assessed using the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) model. The climatic variables considered were maximum temperature (Tmax), minimum temperature (Tmin), diurnal temperature range (DTR), precipitation (PR), and CO emissions (COE). A required series of statistical tests, including pre- and post-analysis, model robustness, and goodness-of-fit were performed, and data met all criteria. Results revealed that Tmin (79.6 %) contributed more than Tmax (20.4 %) to the MS-climate warming over CGP. From 1970 to 2020, the Tmax, Tmin, DTR, and PR changed by + 0.30 °C, +1.17 °C, −1.07 °C, and + 22.54 mm, respectively, exhibiting change rate per decade of + 0.06 °C, +0.23 °C, −0.21 °C, and + 4.42 mm, respectively. Precipitation had no effect on cotton yield in the long or short-term. However, cotton yield significantly decreased with a rise in Tmax, and increased with a rise in Tmin and COE in the long-term. Conclusively, a 1 °C increase in Tmax reduced cotton yield by 6.1 %, a 1 °C increase in Tmin improved it by 5.5 %, and a unit increase in COE increased it by 0.45 % over the long run. Overall, the crop-climate link in MS cotton marked a varied sensitivity towards short and long-term, indicating the need to reassess current mitigation strategies. Additionally, testing the best agronomic practices in a controlled environment at the actual rates of climate change identified by the current study could provide cotton stakeholders with more precise and valuable insights.
密西西比州气候变化与棉花产量关系建模:自回归分布式滞后方法
要制定应对气候变化的减缓战略,就必须对作物与气候之间的历史联系进行深入分析。密西西比州(MS)的棉花(L.)-气候研究缺乏这种分析。迄今为止,研究一直局限于小规模的实验环境,没有机会探索大规模的推论。因此,本研究旨在使用 Mann-Kendall 和 Sen 坡度法计算密西西比州 1970 至 2020 年棉花生长期(CGP)的气候趋势。采用自回归分布滞后(ARDL)模型评估了气候变化对棉花产量的影响。考虑的气候变量包括最高气温(Tmax)、最低气温(Tmin)、昼夜温差(DTR)、降水量(PR)和二氧化碳排放量(COE)。进行了一系列必要的统计检验,包括前后分析、模型稳健性和拟合优度,数据符合所有标准。结果显示,Tmin(79.6%)比Tmax(20.4%)对CGP的MS-气候变暖贡献更大。从 1970 年到 2020 年,Tmax、Tmin、DTR 和 PR 分别变化了 + 0.30 ℃、+1.17 ℃、-1.07 ℃ 和 + 22.54 mm,每十年的变化率分别为 + 0.06 ℃、+0.23 ℃、-0.21 ℃ 和 + 4.42 mm。降水对棉花产量没有长期或短期影响。然而,棉花产量随着温度最高值的升高而明显下降,而随着温度最低值和COE的升高而增加。从长期来看,Tmax 升高 1 °C,棉花减产 6.1%;Tmin 升高 1 °C,棉花增产 5.5%;COE 升高一个单位,棉花增产 0.45%。总体而言,棉花作物与气候之间的联系在短期和长期具有不同的敏感性,这表明有必要重新评估当前的减缓战略。此外,在当前研究确定的实际气候变化率下,在受控环境中测试最佳农艺实践,可为棉花利益相关者提供更准确、更有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信