A Comparative Seismic Study of Wrap-Faced Retaining Wall Embankment Using Sands of Bangladesh

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Ripon Hore, Md. Zakir Hossain, Shoma Hore, Mosharof Al Alim, Riad Arefin, Mehedi A. Ansary
{"title":"A Comparative Seismic Study of Wrap-Faced Retaining Wall Embankment Using Sands of Bangladesh","authors":"Ripon Hore, Md. Zakir Hossain, Shoma Hore, Mosharof Al Alim, Riad Arefin, Mehedi A. Ansary","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01600-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Wrap-faced Sand Reinforced Retaining Wall (WSRW) Model is a worthwhile method that has been used worldwide for studying the seismic performance and successful implementation to fix the erosion problems in low-lying areas for earthquake resiliency purposes. In this research, a holistic WSRW model was built to compute its response under three different earthquake loading conditions namely˗ Kobe, Loma and Koaecli. The model was implemented using a shake table at the laboratory of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Several parameters were utilized. Such as, base acceleration (0.1 g, 0.15 g, 0.2 g), relative density (For Sylhet sand relative density of 48%, 64% and 80%, and for local sand relative density of 26%, 45% and 57%), surcharge (0.7 kPa, 1.12 kPa and 1.72 kPa). It was observed that, strain, face displacement and acceleration amplifications were decreased at higher relative density and surcharge pressure but were increased with high base accelerations. For instance, for a Sylhet sand sample with 48% relative density under the Kobe earthquake testing, acceleration amplifications for base accelerations of 0.1 g and 0.15 g are, respectively, 6.5% and 2.7% less than base accelerations of 0.2 g at normalized elevation 0.5 using a surcharge pressure of 0.7 kPa. However, at normalized elevation 0.5 for the Local sand sample with 26% relative density under Kobe earthquake testing employing the same surcharge pressure, acceleration amplification of 0.1 g and base acceleration of 0.15 g are respectively 10.6% and 7.7% less than base acceleration test for 0.2 g. Another result from the experiment of the Loma earthquake with a surcharge load of 0.7 kPa and 0.1 g base acceleration of Sylhet sand reveals that sample with 80% face displacements as well as relative density of 64% are respectively 12.9% and 8.2% less than the sample with relative density of 48% at normalized elevation 0.625. For similar base acceleration and similar surcharge load Local sand model experiments, samples with face displacements of 57% and relative density of 45% are respectively 14.2% and 8.5% less than the samples with relative density of 26% which is observed at normalized elevation 0.625. In the case of the local sand model, at normalized elevation 0.5, samples having the similar base acceleration and surcharge load, strains of a relative density of 57% and 45% are respectively 10% and 5.1% less than the sample having a relative density of 26%. Seismic characteristics observed from this research are beneficial for not only the design but also construction of WSRW.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01600-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wrap-faced Sand Reinforced Retaining Wall (WSRW) Model is a worthwhile method that has been used worldwide for studying the seismic performance and successful implementation to fix the erosion problems in low-lying areas for earthquake resiliency purposes. In this research, a holistic WSRW model was built to compute its response under three different earthquake loading conditions namely˗ Kobe, Loma and Koaecli. The model was implemented using a shake table at the laboratory of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET). Several parameters were utilized. Such as, base acceleration (0.1 g, 0.15 g, 0.2 g), relative density (For Sylhet sand relative density of 48%, 64% and 80%, and for local sand relative density of 26%, 45% and 57%), surcharge (0.7 kPa, 1.12 kPa and 1.72 kPa). It was observed that, strain, face displacement and acceleration amplifications were decreased at higher relative density and surcharge pressure but were increased with high base accelerations. For instance, for a Sylhet sand sample with 48% relative density under the Kobe earthquake testing, acceleration amplifications for base accelerations of 0.1 g and 0.15 g are, respectively, 6.5% and 2.7% less than base accelerations of 0.2 g at normalized elevation 0.5 using a surcharge pressure of 0.7 kPa. However, at normalized elevation 0.5 for the Local sand sample with 26% relative density under Kobe earthquake testing employing the same surcharge pressure, acceleration amplification of 0.1 g and base acceleration of 0.15 g are respectively 10.6% and 7.7% less than base acceleration test for 0.2 g. Another result from the experiment of the Loma earthquake with a surcharge load of 0.7 kPa and 0.1 g base acceleration of Sylhet sand reveals that sample with 80% face displacements as well as relative density of 64% are respectively 12.9% and 8.2% less than the sample with relative density of 48% at normalized elevation 0.625. For similar base acceleration and similar surcharge load Local sand model experiments, samples with face displacements of 57% and relative density of 45% are respectively 14.2% and 8.5% less than the samples with relative density of 26% which is observed at normalized elevation 0.625. In the case of the local sand model, at normalized elevation 0.5, samples having the similar base acceleration and surcharge load, strains of a relative density of 57% and 45% are respectively 10% and 5.1% less than the sample having a relative density of 26%. Seismic characteristics observed from this research are beneficial for not only the design but also construction of WSRW.

Abstract Image

使用孟加拉国砂土的包覆式挡土墙堤坝抗震对比研究
包面砂加固挡土墙(WSRW)模型是一种值得采用的方法,已在全球范围内用于研究抗震性能,并成功用于解决低洼地区的侵蚀问题,以达到抗震目的。本研究建立了一个整体 WSRW 模型,以计算其在˗ Kobe、Loma 和 Koaecli 三种不同地震荷载条件下的响应。该模型是在孟加拉国工程技术大学(BUET)实验室的振动台上实现的。使用了几个参数。例如,基础加速度(0.1 克、0.15 克、0.2 克)、相对密度(锡尔赫特砂的相对密度为 48%、64% 和 80%,当地砂的相对密度为 26%、45% 和 57%)、附加荷载(0.7 千帕、1.12 千帕和 1.72 千帕)。结果表明,在相对密度和附加荷载压力较高时,应变、路面位移和加速度放大都有所减小,但在基底加速度较大时,应变、路面位移和加速度放大都有所增大。例如,在神户地震测试中,对于相对密度为 48% 的西尔赫特砂样本,在正常化标高为 0.5、附加压力为 0.7 kPa 的情况下,基底加速度为 0.1 g 和 0.15 g 时的加速度放大率分别比基底加速度为 0.2 g 时小 6.5% 和 2.7%。然而,在神户地震试验中,对于相对密度为 26% 的本地砂样本,采用相同的附加压力,在归一化标高为 0.5 时,0.1 g 的加速度放大率和 0.15 g 的基底加速度分别比 0.2 g 的基底加速度试验小 10.6% 和 7.7%。另一项洛马地震实验结果表明,在规范化标高 0.625 处,表面位移为 80% 和相对密度为 64% 的西尔赫特砂样品比相对密度为 48% 的样品分别少 12.9% 和 8.2%,而附加荷载为 0.7 kPa 和基底加速度为 0.1 g 的西尔赫特砂样品比相对密度为 48% 的样品分别少 12.9% 和 8.2%。在类似基底加速度和类似附加荷载的本地砂模型试验中,在归一化标高为 0.625 时,表面位移为 57% 和相对密度为 45% 的样本分别比相对密度为 26% 的样本少 14.2% 和 8.5%。就当地砂模型而言,在归一化标高为 0.5 时,具有类似基底加速度和附加荷载的样本,相对密度为 57% 和 45% 的应变分别比相对密度为 26% 的样本小 10%和 5.1%。这项研究观察到的抗震特性不仅有利于设计,也有利于建造水利工程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信